![]()
![]()
Think that about covers it.
Definition of failure:
20% behind the most successful product in the history of your industry.
Definition of failure:
20% behind the most successful product in the history of your industry.
I won't deny that Wii U sales are abysmal and I think they're past the point of being able to really turn it around, however as far as I'm concerned Wii U has had a great first year:
ZombiU
New Super Mario Bros U
New Super Luigi U
Pikmin 3
Lego City Undercover
The Wonderful 101
Rayman Legends
Wind Waker HD
Donkey Kong: Tropical Freeze
Super Mario 3D World
Rayman Legends
If I have played as many great exclusives as that (Rayman being the only 3rd party title) on my PS4 as that in the first year I'll be extremely happy. Nintendo has delivered with the games, just not the sales.
Nintendo needs to make a case for why stand-alone gaming should still exist. Im not sure this is possible, mind you. But I think this is the only way they exit our current era as a leader, rather than a has-been. The Wii seemed close, but ultimately turned out to be pretty much the definition of a fad. Still, that thinking-outside-the-box allowed them to albeit briefly surpass both Sony and Microsoft.
That's not a great year, you listed Rayman twice, you listed a reskin DLC, and HD re release, some of those games are not even out yet, and look at the metacritic scores of those that are.
At this point I would be perfectly fine with Nintendo giving up consoles and being a handheld only company, more 3DS games the better
He should right a article about vita if he wants to talk about failure.
From the same article, this will get discussion going
Nintendo needs to make a case for why stand-alone gaming should still exist.
I see you've actually played it then. Oh wait.
That's not a great year, you listed Rayman twice, you listed a reskin DLC, and HD re release, some of those games are not even out yet, and look at the metacritic scores of those that are.
At this point I would be perfectly fine with Nintendo giving up consoles and being a handheld only company, more 3DS games the better
Nintendo definitely don't have as rosy a future as many would have you believe, but I think 'on the path to failure' is an exaggeration. They do need to step their game up though.
I can agree with that, challenging times but they'll still be around for a while yet.Nintendo definitely don't have as rosy a future as many would have you believe, but I think 'on the path to failure' is an exaggeration. They do need to step their game up though.
Heh.I totally can't jive with this bit. The 2DS is a sign that Nintendo still 'get it'. It's a really good move and will go some way to getting their handhelds back on track.
I would like to hear this guy's definition of Vita if 3DS is a failure.
Groan.He should right a article about vita if he wants to talk about failure.
So selling worse than best selling handheld ever makes company doomed.They realize the metrics that really matter: that the 3DS is tracking roughly 20 percent behind its predecessor in terms of sales. Thats not only not a good trend, its a devastating one (after a few early price cuts, to boot). A couple more of those and we have a company on the brink.
They realize the metrics that really matter: that the 3DS is tracking roughly 20 percent behind its predecessor in terms of sales. Thats not only not a good trend, its a devastating one (after a few early price cuts, to boot). A couple more of those and we have a company on the brink.
Mostly the same, couple new levels and bosses, still a reskin
He should right a article about vita if he wants to talk about failure.
I hate the "tracking below the DS" argument because the DS was one of highest selling products in the history of video games. Everything is tracking below the DS. Why didnt this argument pop up with the PS3 which has not and will never reach the PS2. Heck the Vita isn't even tracking with the PSP. Yet no "Sony is dooooooomed"
Mostly the same, couple new levels and bosses, still a reskin
They have failed to make great products for a number of years now.
I think the headline is the most inflammatory part, as usual, but there are some salient points in the body of the article.
MG Siegler is usually worth reading, and pretty well placed to comment.
Replying to the article with a funny picture or "Horrible Article" isn't exactly a great counter point.