Post something of worth or get out.
Nah, we just don't shut down a new platform for the sole purpose of "but this is how it is now". That's not how technology works, and especially not video games.
Name 3 things Valve have done in the past 5 years that have been a flash in the pan.
This graph is hilarious. 0%, then 1%, then 10%, then 100%, all equally divided so it looks like there are actual significant gains being made in linux when in actuality it's 1.2%
![]()
This is just... the best bad graph of all time.
Nah, we just don't shut down a new platform for the sole purpose of "but this is how it is now". That's not how technology works, and especially not video games.
Name 3 things Valve have done in the past 5 years that have been a flash in the pan.
Do we know what distro this is based off of?
Wait, PS3's OS is built on a Linux core? Really?
I trust them more than Canonical's recent bullshit.
i don't need to name 3 things I will name one: Releasing Half-Life as episodes. That being said there is no way Windows will be going anywhere as a gaming platform.
How is this? Stop with the false equivalence or get out. Your statement was ridiculous as the two are not even remotely comparable.
Do we know what distro this is based off of?
Not true. If you can't play Windows only games Steam O/S will never get off the ground. No dev is gonna start developing to a limited O/S like Linux unless they can get the sales they currently get on Windows.
"We've been told that"
Oh, okay. (Not to mention how little I trust OMGUbuntu for information like this, seriously.)
sales on windows pc's are not anything to write home about. it
Another thing as a Linux user if Valve hopes to have any success and any hope to rival its Windows user base the SteamOS better be all gui based.
This has widespread implications a generation from now, but the pure legacy support of Windows will be tough to beat for a long time. PC gamers will have to have some sort of dual boot to make it a complete gaming system for a while.
Isn't part of the appeal of PC gaming in the fact that you can just upgrade to beefier parts on the computer you would already normally have in your regular life for Internet, email, office, iTunes, etc? And saying "just get a Mac for that other stuff" once again brings it back to requiring the ownership of two sets of hardware where Microsoft's decades long advantage has been hosting THE OS for productivity as well as gaming which only necessitates one monetary hardware purchase to accomplish both tasks.
I guess there are Linux workarounds for all that stuff for people in the know, but I like that my PC I would have already owned for my life can also be a gaming box.
They would have to prove that it can totally replace your regular home PC for those types of PC gamers.
Steam Linux right now recommends that version of Unbuntu and there are records of that version in the registry under 'home test' depot.
That is the only evidence to go by right now.
Another thing as a Linux user if Valve hopes to have any success and any hope to rival its Windows user base the SteamOS better be all gui based.
This graph is hilarious. 0%, then 1%, then 10%, then 100%, all equally divided so it looks like there are actual significant gains being made in linux when in actuality it's 1.2%
Hum, what the hell are you babbling about?For PC master race, this stuff is guaranteed to suck when playing FPS game, too. I really don't see the point.
Not enough information to go off to make any conclusion at all.
I mean, I would probably say an old version of Ubuntu is the most likely (Ubuntu version numbers are year.month) but similarities in distros could mean they've moved over to Debian or Mint since the launch of Steam on Linux.
windows isnt all gui based either
They didn't modify the OS, but since it's open, you have much better insight what happens behind the scenes and can therefore optimize better. Also, Linux simply performs better than Windows in many cases thanks to its superior memory management and file systems, as well as its ability to use different schedulers designed for different workloads. It's not a monolithic "one size fits all" product. It's extremely modular and can be tailored to and optimized for almost any need.So hold on, you are saying the modified the Linux stack to run a source engine game? So that is what they are doing? Hmm what happens to non source engine games? If you are actually inferring that they have some Secret sauce that makes all OPENGL games run better, that they have a better coder than John Carmack over there, I have an bridge to sell you.
It's very likely Ubuntu, forking to cover its own needs and fixing some of the dumb crap Ubuntu has done, ala Mint. Mint is based on Ubuntu which is based on Debian, after all, so it would be package compatible either way.
Or they could have lost their minds (or become more sane, if you ask me...) and gone with something more stable, performing and secure like Slackware, CentOS or Arch, which are all helpfully, (fairly) package compatible as well.
They didn't modify the OS, but since it's open, you have much better insight what happens behind the scenes and can therefore optimize better. Also, Linux simply performs better than Windows in many cases thanks to its superior memory management and file systems, as well as its ability to use different schedulers designed for different workloads. It's not a monolithic "one size fits all" product. It's extremely modular and can be tailored to and optimized for almost any need.
Hum, what the hell are you babbling about?
Sure if you strip down components and tailor it to a specific task/hardware you will see a performance gain. However to compete with Windows you need it to also perform general computing tasks, which are not simply tailored to a GameOS, as well as widen your support for hardware, etc etc.. There comes the problems and quirks of running a Linux based OS.
This doesn't seem to be competing with Windows. Certainly not as a Desktop OS like Windows is. It's just for games and media. So, no, it does not need to do general computing tasks.
And the problems and quirks of running a Linux based OS are no more problematic as Windows' problems and quirks are. But if you make it just for games, you can make the system smooth and essentially "console-like."
Agreed. I'm just saying it's potentially possible and that those particular pieces of information do not confirm OMGUbuntu's shoddy reporting in any way.
I wonder if Valve's looking at Canonical going insane and saying, "hmmm, maybe a better base would suit us," which is why Debian stands out to be as a candidate. But they could have a lot of different priorities depending on what else they announce this week, so who knows.
Arch would be insane. I can't see them on a rolling distro; but then that makes me wonder how they'll roll out updates. Slackware would be funny (the Church of the Subgenius would have a field day) but I don't see much benefit over Debian. CentOS would actually be a really sane and good choice.
You can play all your Windows and Mac games on your SteamOS machine, too. Just turn on your existing computer and run Steam as you always have - then your SteamOS machine can stream those games over your home network straight to your TV!
I'm not talking about stripping things down. Also, gaming and those "general tasks" you're probably talking about are generally the same workload and well served by the same or a very similar configuration. Running a server for example would be a different workload.Sure if you strip down components and tailor it to a specific task/hardware you will see a performance gain. However to compete with Windows you need it to also perform general computing tasks, which are not simply tailored to a GameOS, as well as widen your support for hardware, etc etc.. There comes the problems and quirks of running a Linux based OS.
So if I have a PC running an intel 4000 setup I can stream games to it from my main PC and it won't look like shit?
Ok I understand this point. But it will be extremely hard to get any sort of install base which means lack of 3rd Party support on the PC side. If it wont be able to replace Windows as an Operating system, then it is limited to a niche market which is willing to dualboot just cause they can, or willing to cut the cord entirely with Windows.
So after that you are left with steamboxes. Depending on the price they may be worth it, however they will be competing with consoles and their own offerings.
Is it possible for them to start from the base Linux instead of working off another distro?
I don't get it? I can do that by bringing down my laptop and doing the same thing but without worry about environment interference(I roll with gaming laptop). Hell, any TV with a wireless card built-in can stream from the PC without buying a Steambox. Valve, you have to give me more than just that. I see the potential, but I don't see why I should buy another device, when my PC can do that for me.
There are x86 builds of ARM. There are quite a few higher end tablet models that are x86 based and use either windows RT or Android.
Show what exactly? Start Steam, enable Big Picture -> that's what SteamOS looks like. I would imagine they don't even run a desktop environment in the background, just Steam for Linux directly on X or Wayland or something.Would have been nice to actually show the OS in some form.
I guess this will be like BPM. Announced but its going dark for the next 18+ months.
isnt it targeted to the people who use BPM?Personally I am unsure who they are targeting this feature towards. PC Gamers are not ones to take performance hits lightly, and non pc gamers don't really have machines that could run games well enough to stream over a network.
Can anyone see Sony bringing Vita TV functionality to SteamOS, since they are not (for now) bringing out Vita TV outside Japan?