wsoxfan1214
Banned
Didn't even need to read past the title to see the stereotyping of all cops based of a couple. Then come into the topic and see everyone doing it. So edgy.
Impressive.
Impressive.
Video makes me sick.
My friends brother was a white cop and saw almost exactly this shit going down, pulled the dickhead officer aside and apologised to the black guy being unfairly harassed. For doing this he went from being one of the most popular guys in the station to being sidelined from promotions and constantly bullied. He quit within a year and is currently a shelf stacker at Walmart, says he wouldn't do anything differently because he knows what was going down wasn't right. I have so much respect for him.
Got it in one. He didn't even report the offending officer, just gave him a 'WTF are you doing' 10 second chat. Sucks.Fucking Blue Code of Silence.
The most recent episode of This American Life (it's ep 414), has a story about a cop who didn't like the way that his department was being run. So he carried a recorder with him to expose what was happening (illegal stop and searches, arrest quotas that had to be met, etc.). To say that all cops are bad, or cowards is just wrong. Here is a link to a news story about him, as well as a link to the "This American Life" episode with his story.
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/414/right-to-remain-silent
http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-05-04/news/the-nypd-tapes-inside-bed-stuy-s-81st-precinct/
Didn't even need to read past the title to see the stereotyping of all cops based of a couple. Then come into the topic and see everyone doing it. So edgy.
Impressive.
ITT: people generalizing cops to the max
Unless cops are complete assholes in the US, I think this is a rotten apple, nothing more
There are blatantly obvious, statistically quantifiable, systemic problems with the police in the US.
I often hear people say stuff like, "How does racism still exist these days?"Also i never said all cops are bad or cowards, just the majority of them.
The problem is that those few bad apples are constantly shielded and protected by the "good" cops.ITT: people generalizing cops to the max
Unless cops are complete assholes in the US, I think this is a rotten apple, nothing more
Where's the racist part though?
Calling him a freeloader. He was seething with racial overtones.
The problem is that those few bad apples are constantly shielded and protected by the "good" cops.
thanks for the link, restored some faith in humanity. They really should make cameras on cops standard issued.
Still, you can't deny that this kind of case is waaaay more uncommon than the opposite (blue shield). Also i never said all cops are bad or cowards, just the majority of them.
it seems you agree on calling cops who behave according to omertá cowards and complicit in their colleagues crimes, or did i get that wrong?
I'm glad that not all cops are like that.
I think you have a point but I also think there's a huge difference between how someone is born, and a career that a person chooses. When you say "black people are bad" you are saying that black people are inherently bad. When you say "cops are bad" it is understood as a systemic problem within a group of people who choose their circumstances.I often hear people say stuff like, "How does racism still exist these days?"
And your post is exactly why. Because people generalize like this. Your rationale is no better than somebody who has a few bad experiences with some black people and finds themselves thinking that the majority of black people are bad people afterwards.
I've said it quite a few times before on this board, but we really need to attack prejudicial thinking as a whole. Its difficult because our brains are basically wired to generalize like this, but that can be overcome. The problem is that prejudicial attitudes are treated as ok in some cases and not in others. So people get the idea that 'racism' is the type of prejudicial attitude they should avoid, while saying that the majority of cops are scum is something perfectly fine to think and say. Its not right and its not fair, but worst of all, it lends credence to prejudicial thinking in general.
How can anyone make assumptions off this? The cops sounded like idiots, but who knows the full story?
And there it is.
I often hear people say stuff like, "How does racism still exist these days?"
And your post is exactly why. Because people generalize like this. Your rationale is no better than somebody who has a few bad experiences with some black people and finds themselves thinking that the majority of black people are bad people afterwards.
I've said it quite a few times before on this board, but we really need to attack prejudicial thinking as a whole. Its difficult because our brains are basically wired to generalize like this, but that can be overcome. The problem is that prejudicial attitudes are treated as ok in some cases and not in others. So people get the idea that 'racism' is the type of prejudicial attitude they should avoid, while saying that the majority of cops are scum is something perfectly fine to think and say. Its not right and its not fair, but worst of all, it lends credence to prejudicial thinking in general.
I think it goes beyond just pedantry, though. People here are outright saying that a majority of cops are bad people. That's pretty awful to me. Being a police officer is generally an honourable sort of job to have and to aspire to and I don't think its fair to generalize the entire group of people within the profession to be 'bad people'.I think you have a point but I also think there's a huge difference between how someone is born, and a career that a person chooses. When you say "black people are bad" you are saying that black people are inherently bad. When you say "cops are bad" it is understood as a systemic problem within a group of people who choose their circumstances.
As an example that I think lies somewhere between your race and your chosen profession: when people say something like "GAF'ers have too many girl issues" or whatever, it is understood by most people that they are not referring to every single GAF'er ever. You could be more technical and say "it appears to me from the threads that I've personally read during the time that I've been on GAF, that some, perhaps even an appreciable amount of GAF'ers have shown that they have had problems at one point or another in their lives with women, or with a particular woman", but I don't think that's necessary, I think everyone pretty much gets that you're not saying it is every single person who has ever posted on GAF, and that you're talking about a trend. Most people have at least enough social awareness for that.
Now when it comes to cops, some people seem to forget that social awareness when it doesn't happen in other threads. I'm guessing it's just because of how very frequently the GAF hivemind expresses it's distaste for the American police system, which breeds in many people a need for contrarianism.
I did say you have a point, and I do think that for people that are not as, let's say, "mentally astute" as GAF'ers (I just stereotyped GAF as being smart!), I think it's easier for that demographic to miss obvious implication or subtext. I also think there's a demographic of REALLY smart people who don't have a great social awareness or a great understanding of how people communicate, and might take statements like that too literally. Most people though, understand that when someone makes a generalization, that they mean to express a trend.
I think you're kind of missing the point, which is that the same root line of reasoning is the same. I don't disagree that there's a problem within the police force on the issue. But condemning all or most of police officers for it is not the right response. There's a problem with violent gangs in the black community, but the appropriate response isn't to vilify black people in general, right? Generalizing like this accomplishes nothing but spreading ill will.what exact claim do you oppose:
-Is it not true that police brutality and misconduct in general are widespread and a significant problem for large sections of the population?
-Is it not true that police brutality and misconduct in general are punished only in a minority of all cases?
-is it not true that in order for crimes that only ever occur in the presence of police officers to be ignored a majority of times, a majority of police officers must be either ignoring, condoning, covering up or committing the crimes?
-is the ignoring, condoning, covering up or committing of crimes not something that should be considered "bad behavior"?
please, tell me if there's a lapse in my logic.
also shame on you for comparing this to racism. by the same reasoning you could equate hating on bankers, lobbyists or mercenaries to racial discrimination.
I think you're kind of missing the point, which is that the same root line of reasoning is the same. I don't disagree that there's a problem within the police force on the issue. But condemning all or most of police officers for it is not the right response. There's a problem with violent gangs in the black community, but the appropriate response isn't to vilify black people in general, right? Generalizing like this accomplishes nothing but spreading ill will.
what the hell is with the pavement and road?
it looks like some 3rd world country
How can anyone make assumptions off this? The cops sounded like idiots, but who knows the full story?
Also, to anyone who likes to take a cop's side of a story at face value over anyone else's, consider how easily this happened:
The guy with the phone is walking down the street with the guy who said hi to the alleged drug drealer, "hi" guy gets detained and phone guy starts walking away without saying a word.
The cop then says "You get back here, and put your phone away."
9 minutes later:
Cop: "You kept mouthing off instead of just leaving."
Phone guy: How did I keep mouthing off?! I tried to leave!"
Cop: "No you didn't."
Phone guy: "You said come back."
Cop: "Come back because you kept talking."
Phone: "I wasn't even talking!"
Cop: "You should've just left."
How easily the facts are distorted when reality isn't favorable. It's not like he even killed an innocent person or something, he was just losing a little argument and brought out the lies. Police need to be taped at all times when on duty for accountability considering how much potential for abuse of authority they have.
The problem is that those few bad apples are constantly shielded and protected by the "good" cops.
Cops are institutionally racist. Who knew.