Julianne Hough (Actress/Singer/Dancer) Blackface Halloween costume

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there really an outrage over this shit tho? I just hope she had at least ONE friend who tapped her on the shoulder and said "Is the skin coloring necessary?"
 
And you can't tell what someone's intent is? This girl doesn't seem like she was trying to offend anyone, nor was she portraying a caricature of someone. She really liked a character and tried to dress up as her to pay tribute. She should have known better, but she made a mistake.

Blackface is different. There is obvious intention make fun of black people as a whole. I'm not saying people can't be offended by this, but when anyone equates THIS to what white folks did before the 1970s regularly I have to wonder if you are just looking for something to be outraged by.
Intent doesn't matter as much as many seem to believe here. Ignorance is one thing - but defense of it, an immediate and clear covering of the ears as well, is an issue as well. Many can and want to forgive good intentions all the time. Its easy. It needs to be acknowledged either way though.

And its really irritating having to explain over and over again to every single person that racism is still racism just because it doesn't end in a lynchmob, slavery, a job being denied, or cops being involved. Casual racism that runs on forgivable ignorance doesn't bother me. Someone checks that person/group at the door and says "Hey, just so you know, that's kinda fucked up. Why? Because X" and the person responds with "Geez - that one is on me. Sorry about that. Won't do it again. Didn't mean to rub you the wrong way" and everything is good.

Things go very differently when that second part is replaced by "Actually, there's nothing wrong with this at all. And you need to stop being so dramatic"
 
Is there really an outrage over this shit tho? I just hope she had at least ONE friend who tapped her on the shoulder and said "Is the skin coloring necessary?"

Well, I don't watch that show. If i saw her at a party, I'd assume she was in Blackface as a Black convict in a prison jumpsuit.

And that would likely make me pretty angry.
 
Intent doesn't matter as much as many seem to believe here. Ignorance is one thing - but defense of it, an immediate and clear covering of the ears as well, is an issue as well. Many can and want to forgive good intentions all the time. Its easy. It needs to be acknowledged either way though.

And its really irritating having to explain over and over again to every single person that racism is still racism just because it doesn't end in a lynchmob, slavery, a job being denied, or cops being involved. Casual racism that runs on forgivable ignorance doesn't bother me. Someone checks that person/group at the door and says "Hey, just so you know, that's kinda fucked up. Why? Because X" and the person responds with "Geez - that one is on me. Sorry about that. Won't do it again. Didn't mean to rub you the wrong way" and everything is good.

Things go very differently when that second part is replaced by "Actually, there's nothing wrong with this at all. And you need to stop being so dramatic"

It bothers me.

"You speak so well" is the most irritating casual racism to me that I experience most.
 
Naw, not really. That's coming from someone that is Black.

I would be waaaaaay less offended by Moris, a Latino guy, dressed as Jules with a black curly wig (as Jules did have a jheri curl) than i would be if he went the extra step and painted his face black.

I'd know who he was supposed to be via his costume.

Julianne Hough prolly STILL had to explain to people who she was supposed to be in a lot of cases.

Blackface used wigs, Jules skin is dark, I can understand the argument you make, but this about the wig seems to contradict what people have been arguing that makes the painted face stuff offensive when it is part of a costume.
 
Well, I don't watch that show. If i saw her at a party, I'd assume she was in Blackface as a Black convict in a prison jumpsuit.

And that would likely make me pretty angry.

I get that, I don't think I'd jump to think she was a racist because I didn't understand what she was going for with this costume; not that you're making that leap.

I would have just thought she was an idiot who had no one to check her because she walked out the door.
 
Blackface used wigs, Jules skin is dark, I can understand the argument you make, but this about the wig seems to contradict what people have been arguing that makes the painted face stuff offensive when it is part of a costume.

Well, in that case of Pulp Fiction, assuming Moris had straight hair, someone could think he was Vincent (as they wore the same outfits) instead of Jules.

In this unique case, he could be mistaken for another character without the wig.

Now, I wouldn't be cool if someone just threw on a curly wig where it didn't fit at all.

I hope that makes sense.
 
It bothers me.

"You speak so well" is the most irritating casual racism to me that I experience most.

I'd rather deal with someone who wears a confederate flag for a shirt than have a conversation with someone who is happy to go through mental gymnastics to tell me how I'm not aware of what is and what isn't blackface and how I and others should or should not be offended by something. Its why I stood clear of the Tiny Tina bullshit and why I dodge a majority of the threads here on GAF regarding race these days.

Its easier to deal with a far right wing, "all minorities just want handouts", hardliner. Far easier.

"She wasn't trying to be racist. She's a good person." Gonna be plenty of it. Okay, sure. I like her too. You can do racist shit and not have any pronounced dislike, hate, or contempt for another race. Its more common and likely to happen actually. But to many its not a big deal until we get to dumb shit like this.
 
I'd rather deal with someone who wears a confederate flag for a shirt than have a conversation with someone who is happy to go through mental gymnastics to tell me how I'm not aware of what is and what isn't blackface and how I and others should or should not be offended by something. Its why I stood clear of the Tiny Tina bullshit and why I dodge a majority of the threads here on GAF regarding race these days.

Its easier to deal with a far right wing, "all minorities just want handouts", hardliner. Far easier.

"She wasn't trying to be racist. She's a good person." Gonna be plenty of it. Okay, sure. I like her too. You can do racist shit and not have any pronounced dislike, hate, or contempt for another race. Its more common and likely to happen actually. But to many its not a big deal until we get to dumb shit like this.

Yeah man. Totally agree.
 
Many asians (and some women generally) make their skin lighter with makeup, many caucasians tan their skin to make it darker (often quite dark) - both times with the desire to be more attractive (to varying success). Is this somehow inherently different because it's only for a one-off costume?

Also if we actually look at the end result, the appearance of a person, doesn't this discussion bring into it other aspects such as men taking on feminine appearances, etc?

Just throwing my thoughts around.
 
you would not rather deal with the confederate flag idiots. they're stupid and no one is telling you how to think or what you're aware of.
 
Many asians (and some women generally) make their skin lighter with makeup, many caucasians tan their skin to make it darker (often quite dark) - both times with the desire to be more attractive (to varying success). Is this somehow inherently different because it's only for a one-off costume?

Also if we actually look at the end result, the appearance of a person, doesn't this discussion bring into it other aspects such as men taking on feminine appearances, etc?

Just throwing my thoughts around.

She didn't get a tan, she painted her skin to make herself look like a black person. I don't think she meant anything malicious by it, but for someone in her position, who has a team of publicists, agents and managers who you would think could tell her "Hey this might not be a great idea...", it's pretty stupid.
 
you would not rather deal with the confederate flag idiots. they're stupid and no one is telling you how to think or what you're aware of.

You know EXACTLY where those people are coming from and they aren't shy about it. Casual racism is worse because in a lot of cases, people are unwilling to even see how it is bad and/or offensive.
 
and because someone isn't shy about something that makes it better? make no mistake, both cases of racism are casual, one is just much more likely to see how bad or golly gee offensive it might be.

and it isn't the one flying the confederate flag.
 
She didn't get a tan, she painted her skin to make herself look like a black person. I don't think she meant anything malicious by it, but for someone in her position, who has a team of publicists, agents and managers who you would think could tell her "Hey this might not be a great idea...", it's pretty stupid.

I understand. I know of people who've tanned excessively and are as dark as she painted herself to be, so my post was actually more about appearances in general, and whether there is an inherent difference between someone deciding to look a certain way and a one-off appearance.
 
I think youve mistaken all of bs' posts as something they're not

I don't wanna derail this thread but I'm talking about real life experience, man.

I have tried to explain to people in the past that telling me "I speak so well" isn't a compliment.

They don't understand it.

I have had Asian friends get the same shit, in a different way. "Wow, you speak with no accent!"
 
]and because someone isn't shy about something that makes it better? [/B]make no mistake, both cases of racism are casual, one is just much more likely to see how bad or golly gee offensive it might be.

and it isn't the one flying the confederate flag.

Some (many here) think that labeling someone or something as racist is a lifelong, inescapable scarlet letter when that isn't the case at all. But that's the kind of talk you can expect to have when such a large number of people did the majority of their thinking about racism in elementary or middle school classrooms.

There's a very distinct difference. Its not about being shy either. Its about the thought that they've put into it.
 
I hope I live to see the day when the American public can get past the knee jerk reaction of calling any light skin person who darkens their skin for a costume or artistic performance "blackface." There's no denying that darkening the skin of white people was just one part of blackface and minstrel shows used to demean and ridicule African-Americans, but to say that doing so is eternally off limits for all but satire is beyond asinine. Intent matters.

If you're costuming, altering your skin color should be considered no different than temporarily changing any part of your physical appearance whether that be a wig, contacts, hair cuts, shaving, false beards, prosthetics, falsies, fat suits, corsets, or anything else. It's what you use those tools to create that matters.

As an aside, that Donut ad from Thailand that was deemed racist? I thought it was striking in its beauty, despite possibly actually being blackface. I'm still somewhat conflicted by it.

And I shouldn't have to say this, but bc people will make assumptions if I don't: I say all of this as an African-American (edit: and of course, I should've expected the other snarky response "well you don't speak for all African-Americans!" No, I obviously don't and am not intending to try. See below." This is just my perspective, and a little bit of my background.)
 
I hope I live to see the day when the American public can get past the knee jerk reaction of calling any light skin person who darkens their skin for a costume or artistic performance "blackface." There's no denying that darkening the skin of white people was just one part of blackface and minstrel shows used to demean and ridicule African-Americans, but to say that doing so is eternally off limits for all but satire is beyond asinine. Intent matters.

If you're costuming, altering your skin color should be considered no different than temporarily changing any part of your physical appearance whether that be a wig, contacts, hair cuts, shaving, false beards, prosthetics, falsies, fat suits, corsets, or anything else. It's what you use those tools to create that matters.

As an aside, that Donut ad from Thailand that was deemed racist? I thought it was striking in its beauty, despite possibly actually being blackface. I'm still somewhat conflicted by it.

And I shouldn't have to say this, but bc people will make assumptions if I don't: I say all of this as an African-American.
And I shouldn't have to say this either, but you don't speak for all African-Americans
 
And I shouldn't have to say this either, but you don't speak for all African-Americans

And nowhere did I say I did. It's just if I didn't, somebody's gonna hop in assuming, probably even posting, "oh look another white guy with no problem." It's just my sincere hope that at some point in time, people can get beyond just a kneekjerk reaction of "THIS IS BAAAAD!" to a simple cosmetic action. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
The term, "African-American" has always irked me. It feels like it qualifies (and separates) my Americanism.

Just my opinion.

I've long been conflicted on that too. I remember thinking about it as early as elementary school. I've still come to no great conclusion.
 
And nowhere did I say I did. It's just if I didn't, somebody's gonna hop in assuming, probably even posting, "oh look another white guy with no problem." It's just my sincere hope that at some point in time, people can get beyond just a kneekjerk reaction of "THIS IS BAAAAD!" to a simple cosmetic action. Nothing more, nothing less.

Honestly, the ignorance of someone throwing on blackface (the 'okay' kind) doesn't surprise that much. Even in 2013. What does bother me, and clearly bothers others who've said as much, is that people will casually dismiss it completely and absolutely to the point where they'd even try and dissuade others into believing that its not an issue at all - and that people are wrong to call it for what it is.

I don't think anyone wants the woman's head on a platter or even a public apology. I think many are just irked to the point of fatigue of having to explain this shit over and over as if its our job to do so. Its not like this is the first time a blackface thread has shown up or the first time people have voiced a clear 'dislike' for it and nearly all of its variances. The argument remains the same. A lot of people don't like it for very clear reasons. Many more people basically just don't give a fuck and either cannot or refuse to see those very clear reasons.

There's nothing kneejerk about it.
 
Does everything have to be so blown up? Idk it's not like she was trying to be some random incarcerated black inmate. It's a character from a tv show...

I think that's different than if she were trying to something else, no?

Idk I had a friend (white) who dressed up as Kanye for Halloween. Around the time he interrupted Taylor Swift. He darkened his skin a bit, put on a ridiculous suede shirt but also shaved his head funky like Kanye. I laughed but whatever.

I'm Asian btw. And I wouldn't be offended if someone slanted their eyes to dress up as an Asian person. But whatever. Maybe my tolerance to racism is just different.
 
It's generally thought to be tacky and insensitive. The value of dressing up as that minority character must be weighed against the connotations such an act inherently carries. People are going to be offended.

Didn't some government official recently got fired because he said that both white people and black people are being lazy(hes white, and I forgot the context)). He pretty much got backlash only because of the black comment.


I think society is way too sensitive.
 
That costume was not blackface and obviously she wasn't trying to demean black people, so the uproar about its offensiveness is just PC wank. Some people get their lulz by offense trolling. It's pretty pathetic to stir up a controversy over nothing. These false alarms, for lack of a better term, indirectly harm marginalized groups by making it easier to dismiss real bigotry.
 
That costume was not blackface and obviously she wasn't trying to demean black people, so the uproar about its offensiveness is just PC wank. Some people get their lulz by offense trolling. It's pretty pathetic, and it indirectly causes harm by making it easier to dismiss real bigotry.

Amazing.
 
Edited to clarify what I mean.

While I wasn't equating what she did to traditional, malicious blackface, I do feel what she did was in poor taste and like Ninja Scooter said, her handlers should have been in her ear.

I would hardly think that being somewhat offended by what she did is pathetic or offensive PC trolling.

I get what you are trying to say (there are more serious themes of bigotry and injustice) but it feels like you saying anyone that was offended by this, shouldn't be and if they are, they are pathetic and trolling.

People don't all think the same way and there are different levels of being offended.
 
I'm conflicted here. On the one hand, I think pretty much anyone should know this is offensive, but on the other hand, I want Julianne Hough to have all my babies.
 
"Real bigotry" being used in a statement like that is just...

Goddamnit lol

There is more to racism than massive, can't-miss policies, protests, and nationally televised injustices.
 
"Real bigotry" being used in a statement like that is just...

Goddamnit lol

There is more to racism than massive, can't-miss policies, protests, and nationally televised injustices.

I feel like a lot of people look at the most extreme cases of racism and use that to point out injustices and that is the stuff that matters/counts. Everything else should just be ignored and treated as whatevers. "You being too PC or too sensitive..."

This is the same stuff I hear when people of Native American descent complain about the Redskins or the Braves or that racist as fuck (imo) grinning Indian for the Cleveland Indians. People say all the time that people are too PC...stop being so sensitive...I mean, fuck, that group of people isn't allowed to be offended without being shamed for it? Fans do a gotdamn "Tomahawk Chop" and chant. But no, they should suck it up...stop whining.

Again, if people can still tell me that "I speak so well" and honestly have no idea why that isn't a compliment, then it's easy to see why there are those that can't see why someone might be genuinely offended by Ms. Hough's choices.
 
While I wasn't equating what she did to traditional, malicious blackface, I do feel what she did was in poor taste and like Ninja Scooter said, her handlers should have been in her ear.

I would hardly think that being somewhat offended by what she did is pathetic or offensive PC trolling.

I get what you are trying to say (there are more serious themes of bigotry and injustice) but it feels like you saying anyone that was offended by this, shouldn't be and if they are, they are pathetic and trolling.

People don't all think the same way and there are different levels of being offended.
That's reasonable. If it matters, I clicked this thread expecting some obscene caricature, like a traditional blackface costume. What I saw was mediocre cosplay.

That said, I concede that this isn't a clear cut matter of offensive vs inoffensive.
 
She supposed to be Crazy Eyes? But her hair isn't black and nappy, nor are there spaces between her teeth. Doesn't seem she's really going for authenticity here; makes me really question why she wanted to paint herself brown.

Didn't some government official recently got fired because he said that both white people and black people are being lazy(hes white, and I forgot the context)). He pretty much got backlash only because of the black comment.


I think society is way too sensitive.

This guy? The context is that he is a proponent of the Voter ID law, which makes it harder for many black people to vote. He admits that much of the motivating factor of the law was to "hurt Democrats." When he says whites, he adds no adjective. They're just white. But he describes college kids and blacks as lazy. So, it wasn't a good look for him.

Also, I dunno. Society is still pretty hardcore from my perspective. Now people can hear you when you say something stupid - and it is immortalized! It's like playing public relations with the difficulty modifiers on.
 
White people are privileged enough to inhabit a space where it's a lot more difficult to do things that are racially offensive because they've been and continue to be the dominant culture. It doesn't matter if YOU don't think it's offensive or racist for a white person to paint their face black, it is insensitive at the least considering the history of race relations in this country and even worldwide. Did she mean to be racist? I'm sure she didn't. But that's how it comes across. A lack of ill-will doesn't excuse it. The best way you could spin it is that it's displaying extreme ignorance and insensitivity.

Race isn't part of a costume. You know why you recognize a black guy cosplaying as superman? Because he's wearing the outfit. If you truly can't separate the race of the character from the costume, then maybe you should consider only dressing up as someone that wouldn't force you to do something like blackface.

For the record, I think it would look similarly idiotic for a non-white person to cover themselves in light foundation to look like a character.
Great post.

Also, the folks in this thread who don't know what black face means, here you go

Merriam-Webster dictionary said:
Black Face
:  makeup applied to a performer playing a black person especially in a minstrel show; also :  a performer wearing such makeup

IT'S BLACK FACE

Her intent may not have been racist (I dont personally know her) but the deep rooted nature in our country of white people painting their face is. Shame on her for being insensitive to that.
 
I don't think it's the least bit noteworthy because her intent doesn't seem the least bit derogatory. But then again I have more important things to do with my time than do debate whether or not a b list celebrity is in the wrong or the right.

I'm also humored that a certain someone got infinitely salty in this thread and bid farewell by signing off with a "retards" barb.
 
It doesn't even look like she painted her skin, just looks like bronzer/really dark tan.

Still I think she didn't need it, anyone who'd seen the show would have immediately known who she was.
 
Didn't some government official recently got fired because he said that both white people and black people are being lazy(hes white, and I forgot the context)). He pretty much got backlash only because of the black comment.


I think society is way too sensitive.

If you're talking about the guy from the daily show, the same dude later came out and said (direct quote), "When a nigger can use the word nigger and it not be considered racist, that’s the utmost racism in the world, and it’s hypocrisy," so you may want to rethink your PC conspiracy backlash theory on this one.
 
And its really irritating having to explain over and over again to every single person that racism is still racism just because it doesn't end in a lynchmob, slavery, a job being denied, or cops being involved.
Still doesn't make her making-up like that racist to me, except if the definition of racism is now "considering that skin color is part of a person appearence".
 
uh, yall realize you can be unintentionally insensitive, right? but no.

"people are always so sensitive. pc police, stephen fry, race card. etc. why cant i trivialize an entire race with centuries of history of being oppressed and demeaned with the exact same actions as i'm doing now?? i mean, my neighbour is black and he's okay with it."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom