Ha ha!! You know what's funny? If people have cancelled their pre-order based on this and they announce tomorrow that those features are incoming. Then people won't be able to get their hands on a console until like March next year. Oh man... ha ha!
Why would I listen to music on my iPhone when I have a full speaker system hooked up to the TV that can do a better job?Do I really need to go grab a statistic about custom soundtracks in the age of the iPhone? You also need me to go fetch a statistic on the number of people riding horses instead of driving cars?
I'm so happy this was never something i used on 360, and never wanted on PS3. I don't understand why anyone would want to play nick kershaw* while an epic space battle is occurring in killzone. It sucks for those who use their console as a jukebox, but thankfully that ain't me.
*or anything other then the ost that is present in the game.
I seriously do not understand what they could possibly gain from taking out DLNA.
Does anyone have any idea ?
Okay, you're just bragging about your soundtrack-to-videogame parings. But point taken.It's not just a matter of cash.
Most music i'd be interested in using during a game just isn't available there.
Do they have the Shenmue soundtrack i used with Virtua Fighter 5? No they don't.
Do they have the Léon: The Professional soundtrack, i used with Rainbow Six Vegas? No they don't.
Because it's a 400 dollar machine that prob cost like 800 dollars to make. There's no reason for it not to play mp3's. What if someone doesnt own anything that cna play mp3's and this is their first "multimedia" device. There's no justification for the removal of this feature, that extra 2 dollars out a multimillion dollar company to provide a common service isnt going to bankrupt them. Why should the consumer have to worry about their costs anyway?
So music is the back breaker? the lack of backwards compatibly was fine and dandy?
Fucking hell, how dare nintendo not include a SNES cartridge port on the Wii U.
Simply denying features because you have the older version, pft!
Am I the only one who doesn't care at all if my game console can play music? If I want to listen to music while I play I just mute the tv and put my iPod on.
This why I don't get the logic behind this. Do they think that anyone will subscribe to musicxxx just to listen to their mp3s? Everyone can do this on the cheapest phone available.This is why they're crazy for going through with this. The hackers will work even harder now there is a cause to be fought for, coupled in with the architecture that is closer to PCs and there will be much drama.
Just like with OtherOS being removed from the PS3...
Anything connected to your speaker system is a right place to play music.It's a feature that I've never used. A home console is not the right place to play your mp3s.
I seriously do not understand what they could possibly gain from taking out DLNA.
Does anyone have any idea ?
I seriously do not understand what they could possibly gain from taking out DLNA.
Does anyone have any idea ?
When the hell did I say that? I wasn't aware the PS4 was a giant bonfire for mp3 capable devices.
Do I really need to go grab a statistic about custom soundtracks in the age of the iPhone? You also need me to go fetch a statistic on the number of people riding horses instead of driving cars?
It costs less than 400 to make, they are trying to squeeze a profit out of there product - how dare they not spend an extra 2 dollars to appease your entitlement! How dare they not spend millions to appease the horse driven chariots of the world!
Are you going to sit there and suggest to me that a person buying this doesn't own a phone? or a tablet? or a PC? The system only works on HDTV's. Everyone that is buying this, owns a multimedia device of one sort or the other.
What consumer listens to music on a videogame system instead of their phone or tablet?
Oh, my bit about naivety wasn't aimed at you. It was a general statement. Sorry for being unclear there ;PI see why you think my comments might be a bit naive. I guess what I should have said was that they need to let us know now if this is something permanent or if it will be patched at some point in the future.
The worst part is he recognizes it's entirely an anti-consumer policy yet he's feverishly defending it.Did I say it was a back breaker? You're welcome to start paying attention to what I, by myself have posted, instead of lumping me in with others at any time.
But yeah, I guess your analogy works if almost every other single piece of technology at the time played SNES cartridges. Or wait, if PS4 added a feature that was more beneficial to the user and experience like a disc drive and DVDs did.
Great analogy. Really nailed it.
Oh, my bit about naivety wasn't aimed at you. It was a general statement.
It costs less than 400 to make, they are trying to squeeze a profit out of there product - how dare they not spend an extra 2 dollars to appease your entitlement! How dare they not spend millions to appease the horse driven chariots of the world!
Are you going to sit there and suggest to me that a person buying this doesn't own a phone? or a tablet? or a PC? The system only works on HDTV's. Everyone that is buying this, owns a multimedia device of one sort or the other.
What consumer listens to music on a videogame system instead of their phone or tablet?
It IS an excuse, but what I said is still true. The popularity of a feature IS a factor, and saying it's the same as producing a car with AC is not accurate.
Also removing Linux was arguably worse, since it was present in a product one already bought and then removed from that. However it was such a barely used feature that it ended being footnote. MP3 playback is not that.
LOL, what is this horseshit? Tons of people do this. It's one of the best features of the OG Xbox and 360, mostly used in-game but I used my OG Xbox as a media hub because you could burn music onto it from a CD, I didn't have my PC hooked up to my main stereo system.
Is that a serious question, or you being sarcastic?
Don't listen to music on the ps3 so I don't care, but it's still stupid since I know that there is a lot of people that do. What's DLNA, is that media server? Because if it is then it really is huge bullshit
It costs less than 400 to make, they are trying to squeeze a profit out of there product - how dare they not spend an extra 2 dollars to appease your entitlement! How dare they not spend millions to appease the horse driven chariots of the world!
Are you going to sit there and suggest to me that a person buying this doesn't own a phone? or a tablet? or a PC? The system only works on HDTV's. Everyone that is buying this, owns a multimedia device of one sort or the other.
What consumer listens to music on a videogame system instead of their phone or tablet?
Don't worry Kagari confirmed it's fine. No panic.
No fun in that.Shouldn't this be added to the OP then?
Passive aggressive paywallThis is pretty baffling, as there been a explanation from Sony why this is the case?
Damn it Nelson/Yosp - post a fix already.
It costs less than 400 to make, they are trying to squeeze a profit out of there product - how dare they not spend an extra 2 dollars to appease your entitlement! How dare they not spend millions to appease the horse driven chariots of the world!
Are you going to sit there and suggest to me that a person buying this doesn't own a phone? or a tablet? or a PC? The system only works on HDTV's. Everyone that is buying this, owns a nmultimedia device of one sort or the other.
What consumer listens to music on a videogame system instead of their phone or tablet?
Oh wow wtf. What's the point in removing that!!! That's a feature I used a lot on my ps3.Ya its media server, and yes it is total bullshit