• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Xboxone Resolutiongate (Eurogamer)

Sure. Still costs more and isn't as powerful. If it cost the same and wasn't as powerful, I'd still expect the press to acknowledge this, rather than simply downplay it as meaningless to anyone outside of Gaf.

The press should aknowledge the power gap regardless of price. It's so hypocritical for the ones who prefer to play on PC yet they say resolution doesn't matter.
 
OK. But I thought that some soft of technological breakthrough was required, and it wasn't really set in stone that that was going to happen, no matter what.

Regardless, I can be happy with Mark Cerny just being a modern day Leonardo Da Vinci.

I doubt it. It's not really luck that Intel has gone from 45nm, 32nm, 22nm and soon to be on 14nm. It's not luck that we went from DDR to DDR3 and soon DDR4. These are more technological refinements then breakthroughs.

Manufactures know where they are going to go with technology. There can be delays and hiccups in the process. But Sony likely knew that 8gb GDDR5 was going to be possible by PS4 was to launch. That said, I expect quantities they would be able to supply at launch to be a little more up in the air. Just because you can use a new process doesn't always mean it's not without it's early problems.
 
So then, when are we going to hear about the other 3rd party games, NFS, AC etc.

In fact, what are the other launch window multiplats where people think there maybe a difference?
 
GopherD confirmed that 8 GB of GDDR5 wasnt really luck. Sony was working with vendors and giving them everything they needed to make it a reality.

Search his post history and you'll find it.

That's interesting and it makes a lot of sense. It always gets to me when people say Sony got lucky. It's not really luck. They were smart and they are being rewarded for it.
 
I personally am pretty shocked none of the podcasts I listen to made anything of this issue really. Keep hearing the same shit - it's early, it's not a huge difference, the majority of gamers won't care. Really disappointing to hear. IT COSTS MORE AND DELIVERS LESS FOLKS.

I guess. Unless you count the cool Kinect 2.0 tech, the dedicated servers, and the brand new snap/multimedia capabilities, and a year of free XBOX Fitness. Also it has a better launch lineup.

If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.
 
I guess. Unless you count the cool Kinect 2.0 tech, the dedicated servers, and the brand new snap/multimedia capabilities, and a year of free XBOX Fitness. Also it has a better launch lineup.

If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.

Meh, dedicated servers can be found on any console as long as developers are willing to give them to us.

As far as launch line ups, I'm more excited to play Resogun, Warframe, Contrast, and Killzone. So ya know, opinions and all that.
 
I guess. Unless you count the cool Kinect 2.0 tech, the dedicated servers, and the brand new snap/multimedia capabilities, and a year of free XBOX Fitness. Also it has a better launch lineup.

If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.

name one game that uses that cool kinect 2.0 tech, dedicated servers are not exclusive to MS, snap is ok(just not my cup of tea), as for fitness who will really use it, and the launch line up is totally subjective.
 
If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.

Sure. Resolution is the only advantage for PS4.

0279_0mnav0kyr.gif


Nevermind that it's $100 cheaper, has more and better first party development, has cheaper online with tons of free games, looks better, hasn't tried to screw consumers over this year and doesn't come with Kinect.
 
Xbox APU is huge. 363 square mm, 5 billion transistors. For context, an intel haswell i7-4770k is only 177 square mm, the PS4 APU should be around 3.2bn transistors (assuming 7870 as the GPU baseline at 2.8bn, 20CUs with two disabled for yield, and the 8 core jaguar around 400m transistors)

One third of that is down to the ESRAM - 1.6bn transistors.

The Xbox APU will be expensive to make, that's for sure. PS4 chip will drop to smaller process nodes at the same speed as the Xbox, and will always be significantly cheaper to produce.
 
I guess. Unless you count the cool Kinect 2.0 tech, the dedicated servers, and the brand new snap/multimedia capabilities, and a year of free XBOX Fitness. Also it has a better launch lineup.

If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.

Resolution is one manifestation of the power differential. Later on in the generation, if PC engines start to stress PS4, it could drop to 900p or 720p. Where does Xbox go then? Either sub 720p or drop detail levels.
 
Sure. Still costs more and isn't as powerful. If it cost the same and wasn't as powerful, I'd still expect the press to acknowledge this, rather than simply downplay it as meaningless to anyone outside of Gaf.

How much more powerful is the Wii U compared to the PS3 and XBox 360? It's not always about more power. The PS3 cost $200 more than the XBox 360 when it came out, was it 1/3rd more powerful? I didn't see it. Instead people absorbed the cost at the time because it offered bluray playback. The Wii U was $100 more than a PS3 when it debut, was it also almost 1/3 more powerful? Microsoft has already stated they will not sell the system without it. I think they will ride it out as long as they can and when they start falling behind on sales to that of the PS4 they will reduce the price and/or offer incentives like free game pack-ins. It's kind of ironic how so many say the PS3 sold better on average than the XBox 360 but look what it took on Sony's part to do so. They dropped the price faster and more often than the Wii or the XBox 360. Sony also lost a lot of money on the PS3 as well.

They stand a chance if they release a $349 version without Kinect. Right now they are kind of screwed. Pre-order number are tilting heavily towards the PS4 -- and that's in the US. Without FIFA in the EU they would be doomed.

And if anyone is having a hard time believing a product as strong as the Xbox could be botched and that it's not going to hurt the brand just remember Vista. Before it launched Microsoft fanboys were giving the same smug arguments as to why it would not be a failure (strong brand name, loyalty, ecosystem).

You're talking about loyalty from the fanboys that buy game consoles to Vista? That's a real stretch. Windows 7 is a huge success and Windows 8 fell flat. This pattern has happened many times over. Windows XP was before Vista. Why are you talking about Windows in the first place, it serves no purpose to the argument you're trying to make. Two things have gone against the XBox One so far. Actually make that three. One is the price and maybe those smug people didn't think it would be $500. Two is the policies MS wanted to do that had people fuming they later retracted on and are still trying to build trust back. Thirdly is the PS4. How many of those smug Xbros thought that PS4 would be $100 cheaper, more powerful and not have the PR totally favoring Sony this time around?

Anything can be botched. Look at the Wii U, look at the PS Vita, even the PS3 (which Sony managed to turn around, meanwhile some think MS can't with the XBox One?). Maybe the 3rd time rule will apply to the XBox One. The thing is we haven't even started yet and preorders have been solid for the XBox One as well. It has a lot more games than the Vita and Wii U had lined up for the first year too. Anything can happen but what I see is this swarm mentality that still persists trying to make damn sure the XBox One will never get its due. Like as if if it does become a success they won't be able to sleep at night.
 
The PS4 launch lineup is terrible. Killzone does look amazing, as pretty much all of them have, but I don't find them fun to play. I'll probably pick one up later when there are more games out.

Couldn't care less about COD or BF. My problem is that COD looks current gen. If they can't even get 1080p out of a game that ugly, I feel like they shouldn't get my money. This small of a performance jump after 8 years feels like a slap in the face.

I guess. Unless you count the cool Kinect 2.0 tech, the dedicated servers, and the brand new snap/multimedia capabilities, and a year of free XBOX Fitness. Also it has a better launch lineup.

If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.

The strength of either line up is subjective. It depends heavily on what you like to play.

I think it's a pretty sound statement that they both have typical launch line ups. Nothing on either would normally move consoles on it's own. Waiting for more software would be a safe move for anyone who isn't in it for just the new and shininess of it all.
 
Other media outlets are running with it - conveniently taking what DF says as truth.

For example - The Guardian newspaper

http://www.theguardian.com/technolo...tion-4-xbox-one-consoles-call-of-duty-ghostss

BTW, good luck finding the article since it's been buried deep, especially compared to the usual pro xbox articles and the 'sony doesnt have mp3' article.

The funny thing is that most people only read headlines and maybe the first paragraph. How many people on GAF see the title form an opinion and post. The articles shouldn't do much damage at all, if anything probably help.
 
So she was saying number 2 looked better than number 3? If she's a casual observer, did she really drop the word "significant"?

My non-gamer wife couldn't tell the difference.

good questions

she chose #3, the 1080p version, and that quote was verbatim. she is about as casual as you get, and gives no fucks about the current discussion on gaf. so about as objective as you can get.
 
I guess. Unless you count the cool Kinect 2.0 tech, the dedicated servers, and the brand new snap/multimedia capabilities, and a year of free XBOX Fitness. Also it has a better launch lineup.

If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.

Sorry, but this comment is laughable.
 
just tested this image on my girlfriend and she said:

"there is a significant difference in the walls and particles, the rain and explosion. definitely noticeable"

i was up close to the screen and she was about 5 ft away. once i stood where she was the difference immediately became obvious.
I did the same with my gf and she called me a nerd.
 
I really don't care if next-gen is sub-HD, 720p, 1080p, 30fps or 60fps.

Long as they put out games i enjoy i will buy them.
 
I guess. Unless you count the cool Kinect 2.0 tech, the dedicated servers, and the brand new snap/multimedia capabilities, and a year of free XBOX Fitness. Also it has a better launch lineup.

If you're only in it for the hard resolution of the games, then you're right. PS4 is absolutely the better value.

1) Launch lineups don't matter in the grand scheme of things.
2) Kinect won't really matter either - MS themselves have largely been ignoring it lately.
3) Anyone can do dedicated servers.
4) PS4 is pushing more than just a resolution advantage from what we've seen so far. Effects, etc need to be considered as well.
 
What's the point in showing upscaled games using a high quality AA solution when the games so far have barely had any AA. The resolution difference becomes more noticeable when you don't use AA.
 
I really don't care if next-gen is sub-HD, 720p, 1080p, 30fps or 60fps.

Long as they put out games i enjoy i will buy them.

I would rather they develop on a 8 year old machine that already produces sub-hd and 720p games instead of charging $500 in 2013 for a new one.
 
What's the point in showing upscaled games using a high quality AA solution when the games so far have barely had any AA. The resolution difference becomes more noticeable when you don't use AA.

AA option (SSAA) in my screens is off, but Metro Last Light uses some kinda proprietary post processing AA solution similar to FXAA called Analytical Anti-Aliasing. It's not a high quality AA solution.
 
just tested this image on my girlfriend and she said:

"there is a significant difference in the walls and particles, the rain and explosion. definitely noticeable"

i was up close to the screen and she was about 5 ft away. once i stood where she was the difference immediately became obvious.

Chopper also looks blurry in the 720p upscaled
 
I would rather they develop on a 8 year old machine that already produces sub-hd and 720p games instead of charging $500 in 2013 for a new one.

Yes, let's ignore games like Forza 5 that are 1080p and 60fps and how other games like Battlefield 4 will support 64 players online running @60fps and instead focus entirely on the 720p resolution. It's 2005 all over again!
 
Yes, let's ignore games like Forza 5 that are 1080p and 60fps and how other games like Battlefield 4 will support 64 players online running @60fps and instead focus entirely on the 720p resolution. It's 2005 all over again!

You do realize that Microsoft (or Turn 10) had to make a lot of sacrifices in order to get Forza 5 running in Native 1080p w/60 FPS, right?
 
I am not sure if this was posted before (since it is 2 weeks old) but from what I get by this statement is that the PS4 version of Kingdom Hearts 3 will add extra effects, etc...
due to its extra ram....

Tetsuya Nomura
mentioned that the PS4′s sizable RAM “helps a lot” because thanks to it the world can be made as seamless as possible and more data can be permanently resident in the memory. The number of actions, animations and effects can be increased.
The power of the PS4 also increases the ability to make full use of a considerable variety of actions in wide areas, and to fight a large number of enemies.
http://www.dualshockers.com/2013/10...-much-praises-high-ram-and-talks-dualshock-4/

I wonder how big the difference of multi-platforms on the X1 and the PS4 versions would be as the years go on since a lot of devs have decided not to undermined the PS4 versions of their games
 
You do realize that Microsoft (or Turn 10) had to make a lot of sacrifices in order to get Forza 5 running in Native 1080p w/60 FPS, right?

The car models have improved, the physics have as well. Why are you leaving a question without going into details? You also ignored how BF 4 is running at 60fps and can now handle 64 players.
 
Meh, dedicated servers can be found on any console as long as developers are willing to give them to us.

As far as launch line ups, I'm more excited to play Resogun, Warframe, Contrast, and Killzone. So ya know, opinions and all that.

The games are subjective, you're right. I guess I'm not that big into SHMUPs, but Resogun does look cool.

name one game that uses that cool kinect 2.0 tech, dedicated servers are not exclusive to MS, snap is ok(just not my cup of tea), as for fitness who will really use it, and the launch line up is totally subjective.

It's not just for games. It's for the overall experience. Voice commands. Visual profile recognition, XBOX Fitness, Kinect Sport, Just Dance, Zumba. Not for everyone, but like we said above, these things are subjective.

Sure. Resolution is the only advantage for PS4.

0279_0mnav0kyr.gif


Nevermind that it's $100 cheaper, has more and better first party development, has cheaper online with tons of free games, looks better, hasn't tried to screw consumers over this year and doesn't come with Kinect.

It is absolutely cheaper, you're right. As far as development and all of that, for my tastes I'll take a Halo, Forza and Titanfall over Killzone and Infamous. Thanks for including "this year" by the way. Got a chuckle out of that.

Resolution is one manifestation of the power differential. Later on in the generation, if PC engines start to stress PS4, it could drop to 900p or 720p. Where does Xbox go then? Either sub 720p or drop detail levels.

I hear you. We will have to see. Maybe we get the XBOX 32X? LOL. Who knows.

The strength of either line up is subjective. It depends heavily on what you like to play.

I think it's a pretty sound statement that they both have typical launch line ups. Nothing on either would normally move consoles on it's own. Waiting for more software would be a safe move for anyone who isn't in it for just the new and shininess of it all.

I agree with you. Although I think this launch lineup is actually much stronger than what we normally get for launches.

Sorry, but this comment is laughable.

Thanks for your feedback. Next time take the time to elaborate. It's an opinion.

1) Launch lineups don't matter in the grand scheme of things.
2) Kinect won't really matter either - MS themselves have largely been ignoring it lately.
3) Anyone can do dedicated servers.
4) PS4 is pushing more than just a resolution advantage from what we've seen so far. Effects, etc need to be considered as well.

I agree Kagari that launch lineups don't matter in the grand scheme of things. Though I would like to counter that in the grand scheme of things many here will own both consoles.

We'll see about the future growth potential for these consoles. I do agree that the PS4 is more powerful. But it's not like XBOX360 vs. Wii out there.

I didn't mean to ruffle everyone's feathers. It was an observation of the XBOX One value proposition. Nothing more. I'm sure the PS4 will be a great machine.
 
Yes, let's ignore games like Forza 5 that are 1080p and 60fps and how other games like Battlefield 4 will support 64 players online running @60fps and instead focus entirely on the 720p resolution. It's 2005 all over again!

The poster was hypothetically stating he/she didn't care if next gen sub hd or 720p, and said I would rather play those games on current gen instead.

I wasn't speaking to the reality of the current lineup since no games are running sub hd.
 
The poster was hypothetically stating he/she didn't care if next gen sub hd or 720p, and said I would rather play those games on current gen instead.

I wasn't speaking to the reality of the current lineup since no games are running sub hd.

Good news, they can. BF4, COD Ghosts and Titanfall will all be available on current gen system. Even better news, right now you can buy the X360 holiday bundle with a 250gb hard drive for $200.
 
I am not sure if this was posted before (since it is 2 weeks old) but from what I get by this statement is that the PS4 version of Kingdom Hearts 3 will add extra effects, etc...
due to its extra ram....

Tetsuya Nomura
http://www.dualshockers.com/2013/10...-much-praises-high-ram-and-talks-dualshock-4/

I wonder how big the difference of multi-platforms on the X1 and the PS4 versions would be as the years go on since a lot of devs have decided not to undermined the PS4 versions of their games

The same was said about the PS4 version of Final Fantasy XV, too:

Link.

Q: The realistic graphics that remind you of a European town are also impressive.

A: Because Final Fantasy XV's theme is 'fantasy based on reality,' the concept for the art is to look like real-world spaces. That a fantasy is happening within this is a major point for Final Fantasy XV. Realizing this power of expression was difficult before PlayStation 4.

Q: As you continue with development, have you noticed anything about the performance of PlayStation 4?

A: From a developer's point of view, the most interesting point about the hardware is its memory. This is because the more memory you have, the more you can do the impossible.

Q: What kind of "impossible" things do you want to do?

A: The more data you can permanently keep in memory, the more you can decrease loading frequency, and the bigger the scale you can develop. Like we were talking about before, the reason we can produce a lot in real-time is thanks to the amount of memory we have. Because the amount of movements characters make during battle and the amount of weapon types in the game are both numerous, I think the amount of data that needs to be stored works well with PlayStation 4.
 
Good news, they can. BF4, COD Ghosts and Titanfall will all be available on current gen system. Even better news, right now you can buy the X360 holiday bundle with a 250gb hard drive for $200.

I really didn't think it would be this hard, but I'll put here the post I was responding too.

I really don't care if next-gen is sub-HD, 720p, 1080p, 30fps or 60fps.

Long as they put out games i enjoy i will buy them.

OR and IF is the key words.

OR meaning any of those options would do. so IF next gen was just sub hd(suggesting this was the only option) that poster wouldn't care. I disagreed. Since IF (keyword there pay attention) next gen was just sub-hd and 720p there would obviously be games exclusive to that system alone and wouldn't be available elsewhere. The current lineup means nothing since that post was speaking in hypothetical terms.
 
The car models have improved, the physics have as well. Why are you leaving a question without going into details? You also ignored how BF 4 is running at 60fps and can now handle 64 players.

You are not wrong trying to bring some balance to the arguments here but I hear Forza 5 being bandied about like it is some killer-app, technical tour-de-force for XB1.

Yes, the initial reveal trailer of the game looked very impressive, but it has now become clear that that was all smoke and mirrors again by MS as the final game (at least from the several recent videos I have seen) does not look anywhere close to the graphical fidelity offered in that 'gameplay' trailer shown off at the reveal and E3.

Granted, this is quite an unflattering track, but you can't tell me with a straight face this looks as good as the reveal trailer, and therefore it is looking increasingly likely the game isn't the silver bullet some are looking for that somehow demonstrates XB1's hidden processing power. It wouldn't be an overstatement to say the latest videos look like a cleaner, smoother Forza 4.

Judge for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maYgydivvSw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1wylArdU5o
 
The Xbox APU will be expensive to make, that's for sure. PS4 chip will drop to smaller process nodes at the same speed as the Xbox, and will always be significantly cheaper to produce.

This is actually pretty exciting for the lifetime cost of the PS4. The Cell is really holding back the ability of Sony to price drop the PS3 after so many years, but with such a 'basic' architecture we should see the PS4 drop in price much faster.

I wonder how much of a problem the 360's eDRAM has been for dropping the manufacturing cost of the 360 over time.
 
It is the killer app for me. If I could only get one console I would get an XB1 for Forza.

Yeah, absolutely. But for the wider gamer, sales suggest otherwise.

My biggest issue is not the game, it is the way a lot of people appear to have been deceived that it is a graphical tour de force by dishonest MS PR.
 
Yeah, absolutely. But for the wider gamer, sales suggest otherwise.

My biggest issue is not the game, it is the way a lot of people appear to have been deceived that it is a graphical tour de force by dishonest MS PR.

Well the Sebring video is very impressive indeed. Watch it next to the same track on FM4. There is a lot more detail. There is a lot more going on in FM5.

Sure you can't sell it purely on graphics. But this isn't a game that's just about graphics.

But perhaps the differences are much more apparent to those of us still playing FM4 rather than having a passing experience to the game. To me it looks gorgeous - despite most of my gaming (away from Forza) being on PC. Given what the game is doing under the hood I'm amazed it has such good visuals.

I also think it's great T10 has been releasing so much gameplay this week rather than replay videos.

I'm really looking forward to playing this game. If it didn't exist I doubt I'd be buying either console this year.
 
Forza 5 is the Xbox One's killer app imo. Especially with the tent pole multiplatform games looking considerably worse on the platform. However, I would say that in terms of ambition and next gen show casing, F5 is a far cry from Killzone Shadow Fall. In all honesty F5 is not much of a step up technically, gameplay or features wise. Shadow Fall in comparison seems like a much more ambitious and content rich endeavour. Open ended gameplay with huge levels, new OWL gameplay, massive step up technically/graphically, multiple ways to approach missions and levels, 10+ hour single player campaign (I'd be surprised if any of the other shooters come even close to that length), comprehensive multiplayer, free DLC maps etc etc.
 
Wow. Watched the 1080p feed and it really didn't look any better than, say, GT6. I think with racing games, a lot of people get dazzled by the reflections and car models which I don't think are nearly as computationally as expense as your average FPS.
...seriously?
 
I agree Kagari that launch lineups don't matter in the grand scheme of things. Though I would like to counter that in the grand scheme of things many here will own both consoles.

We'll see about the future growth potential for these consoles. I do agree that the PS4 is more powerful. But it's not like XBOX360 vs. Wii out there.

I didn't mean to ruffle everyone's feathers. It was an observation of the XBOX One value proposition. Nothing more. I'm sure the PS4 will be a great machine.

Do we have list of games that are console exclusives for each at launch? I want to see what games that would be available at launch on xb1 and not on ps4 and vise versa?
 
Do we have list of games that are console exclusives for each at launch? I want to see what games that would be available at launch on xb1 and not on ps4 and vise versa?

I'm pretty sure there is one out there I recall seeing that listed every title available for both consoles at launch.

Here it is:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=706393&highlight=xbox+one+launch+lineup

I've found this to be a more exhaustive list. Filter by the continent to group all launch games together.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Xbox_One_games

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PS4_games

It's generally free of errors (except NFS, which is coming a few days after launch for NA).
 
To me the resolution difference is most noticeable with lots of foliage.

Here's a quick Far Cry 3 comparison with no AA. 720p looks a lot worse in motion though, that's for sure.

I suggest opening the images in a new browser tab and switching between them there.

 
Top Bottom