I can't wait for 11/15.
This has been an epic, one-sided obliteration of an American Tech Titan.
Now, it's time to play games... in 1080P/60FPS!
Adios Microsoft. I'll send flowers to the funeral.
This is pretty sad.
I can't wait for 11/15.
This has been an epic, one-sided obliteration of an American Tech Titan.
Now, it's time to play games... in 1080P/60FPS!
Adios Microsoft. I'll send flowers to the funeral.
The answers to those questions have been out since E3:
1) Why is a $399 system outperforming a $499 system? Because of an architectural misstep on Microsoft's part and their inclusion of Kinect as a mandatory device.
2) Will it be fixed? No. It's simply to late in the game to do anything about it now.
People are out looking for blood. People want the gaming press to bash Microsoft for their mistakes. As soon as a gaming journalist doesn't jump on the issue or doesn't consider the issue to be as important as they do (and surprise, surprise, not everyone will care about the visual disparity to the extent that some of us do), they are labelled a corporate shill and dismissed entirely. I expect better from GAFers.
PS4 is about 440 with tax tbh
Same way xbone is 550 with tax and wii u is 330
Who gave you those answers?The answers to those questions have been out since E3:
1) Why is a $399 system outperforming a $499 system? Because of an architectural misstep on Microsoft's part and their inclusion of Kinect as a mandatory device.
2) Will it be fixed? No. It's simply to late in the game to do anything about it now.
People are out looking for blood. People want the gaming press to bash Microsoft for their mistakes. As soon as a gaming journalist doesn't jump on the issue or doesn't consider the issue to be as important as they do (and surprise, surprise, not everyone will care about the visual disparity to the extent that some of us do), they are labelled a corporate shill and dismissed entirely. I expect better from GAFers.
Lots of people seem to suffer from a persecution complex and a lack of introspection. Much has been made recently of the gaming media and their failings to report issues a certain way. Much has been made of commenters on other sites and their seeming disdain for neogaf. Notwithstanding the only conclusion many seem to draw is that everyone else is wrong and only the people on neogaf see the 'truth'.
I've seen a repeated trend where people have accused the gaming media of a double standard - claiming they made a big deal of the differences between PS3 and 360 versions of games, and are now downplaying the differences between the Xbox One and PS4 versions of games. I think this exists more in their memory then in reality. The gaming media did not make a big deal of the the platform differences - people on internet forums did. Some games received slightly higher review scores - something we may well see in this generation.
The other issue I've referred to is the near universal rejection of any outside criticism of neogaf. Like any other site neogaf has it's strengths and weaknesses. However there's a glaring lack of introspection when outside criticisms and suggestions of bias are dismissed without any examination. Personally it's a bit disconcerting to see nearly every thread loaded with dismissive gifs and jabs at the coming consoles. There's also a disturbing trend of some people who barely seem to hide their hope that one console fail.
Having been around for the last several console launches this is little different then most - some actual differences and lots of buzz words. One of the biggest mistakes a person who participates in enthusiast forums can make is assuming that everyone is (or should be) the same issues they are. Some people dismissing the differences as unimportant obviously are doing so based on a personal bias - however this is clearly not true for everyone doing so.
Because the xbox version of cod is so much more creative than the ps4 version..?
Call me crazy but I think there's a vast expanse of ground on the spectrum between "we all declare this generation belongs to Sony" and "Resolution and performance are not a big deal".So much hate and vitriol in this thread. It seems like some people will not be happy until everyone declares this gen belongs to Sony.
The answers to those questions have been out since E3:
1) Why is a $399 system outperforming a $499 system? Because of an architectural misstep on Microsoft's part and their inclusion of Kinect as a mandatory device.
2) Will it be fixed? No. It's simply to late in the game to do anything about it now.
People are out looking for blood. People want the gaming press to bash Microsoft for their mistakes. As soon as a gaming journalist doesn't jump on the issue or doesn't consider the issue to be as important as they do (and surprise, surprise, not everyone will care about the visual disparity to the extent that some of us do), they are labelled a corporate shill and dismissed entirely. I expect better from GAFers.
Gotta Lmao at the mantra being that every outlet that doesn't blow this up to the degree that "we" feel it needs to be are being paid off by MS. Maybe, just maybe, it really ain't as big a deal as "we" think it is.
Lots of people seem to suffer from a persecution complex and a lack of introspection. Much has been made recently of the gaming media and their failings to report issues a certain way. Much has been made of commenters on other sites and their seeming disdain for neogaf. Notwithstanding the only conclusion many seem to draw is that everyone else is wrong and only the people on neogaf see the 'truth'.
I've seen a repeated trend where people have accused the gaming media of a double standard - claiming they made a big deal of the differences between PS3 and 360 versions of games, and are now downplaying the differences between the Xbox One and PS4 versions of games. I think this exists more in their memory then in reality. The gaming media did not make a big deal of the the platform differences - people on internet forums did. Some games received slightly higher review scores - something we may well see in this generation.
The other issue I've referred to is the near universal rejection of any outside criticism of neogaf. Like any other site neogaf has it's strengths and weaknesses. However there's a glaring lack of introspection when outside criticisms and suggestions of bias are dismissed without any examination. Personally it's a bit disconcerting to see nearly every thread loaded with dismissive gifs and jabs at the coming consoles. There's also a disturbing trend of some people who barely seem to hide their hope that one console fail.
Having been around for the last several console launches this is little different then most - some actual differences and lots of buzz words. One of the biggest mistakes a person who participates in enthusiast forums can make is assuming that everyone is (or should be) the same issues they are. Some people dismissing the differences as unimportant obviously are doing so based on a personal bias - however this is clearly not true for everyone doing so.
please, everyone, stop trying to analyze anyone's opinions of anything related to the next gen consoles at this point.
Literally, EVERYONE IS PAID OFF TO PROMOTE ONE OR THE OTHER.
If they weren't paid off, they wouldn't have an opinion (see: giantbomb).
No, I don't have any proof. Just common sense/tinfoil hat.
Anything Sessler says with regards to 'which console is better?' is going to be laced with something injected by his wallet.
Here is what people want:
Gaming journalists to admit that 1080p looks better than 720p, and that as a result of the PS4 being more powerful is more capable of providing those experiences and it has no fucking impact on the quality of gameplay so this isn't an either or problem.
I don't think anyone even cares about the press acknowledging that Sony has better first party studios, just stop trying to downplay the power differences between the consoles. The PS4 is more powerful, FACT. Spit it out and be done with the fence sitting.
I don't really see the contradiction that your talking about.So his point back then was "If games can't be innovative and new, they better be pretty at 1080p/60FPS"
Now he's saying "Resolution and performance don't matter. Innovation and gameplay design is what counts"
There's no reason why we shouldn't have both innovative games AND 1080p though. That's the big flaw in his argument.
Just curious, but why can we get all up in arms about everything above our dairy holes, but no one in the industry or the media can say a lick?
I don't agree with his...tact, for lack of a better word, but we're no better.
I can't wait for 11/15.
This has been an epic, one-sided obliteration of an American Tech Titan.
Now, it's time to play games... in 1080P/60FPS!
Adios Microsoft. I'll send flowers to the funeral.
I think he's all over the place in this video, and he's neither incorrect nor insightful with any particular comment. Agreed, gameplay is important. Agreed, I want games to look interesting from an art perspective as well. No, IQ is not marketing and I don't want great IQ because that has been marketed to me-- it is important as this is a visual medium and graphics are a key part of the user experience. No, discussing resolution and how games look does not take away from people discussing the games and the gameplay itself (those games are not out yet so please let us know what you would like to discuss and we will do so).
This is really so perplexing to me. A very simple discussion was happening in the enthusiast community and the reaction to it has just been to treat it like an anathema; like technology is not or has not been something critical to our hobby for 30 years.
Just deal with it.
He didnt directly compare the prices first of all and secondly he certainly did not include camera (that would be much more)Sessler wasn't talking about tax when he talked about the price difference not being as large, he was adding on the cost of PS+ and the camera to the $400 price tag and ignored that XBL Gold costs money
NotsureifAnd tax doesn't apply to Xbox One? Come on.
BTW, he was referring to when Sessler did PS4 + PSPlus vs. Xbox One comparison, and ignored the price of Gold which is more expensive than PS+.
I find the whole thing amusing and since it is some of this discourse has a purpose, so not a waste of time for me. But I do think some on gaf expect way too much from the press when there is no structure there to ensure they act how people want.
Getting outraged and doing nothing is silly as well. (Be it the Arab Spring or Occupy Wallstreet) This all being mad and lambasting things on the internet is all fine and dandy. But you have to act too.
If enough games don't sell for being 1080p and 60 fps guess what these guys will change their tune. Too much of the samey shit being made? Stop buying the samey looking shit then.
Lots of people seem to suffer from a persecution complex and a lack of introspection. Much has been made recently of the gaming media and their failings to report issues a certain way. Much has been made of commenters on other sites and their seeming disdain for neogaf. Notwithstanding the only conclusion many seem to draw is that everyone else is wrong and only the people on neogaf see the 'truth'.
I've seen a repeated trend where people have accused the gaming media of a double standard - claiming they made a big deal of the differences between PS3 and 360 versions of games, and are now downplaying the differences between the Xbox One and PS4 versions of games. I think this exists more in their memory then in reality. The gaming media did not make a big deal of the the platform differences - people on internet forums did. Some games received slightly higher review scores - something we may well see in this generation.
The other issue I've referred to is the near universal rejection of any outside criticism of neogaf. Like any other site neogaf has it's strengths and weaknesses. However there's a glaring lack of introspection when outside criticisms and suggestions of bias are dismissed without any examination. Personally it's a bit disconcerting to see nearly every thread loaded with dismissive gifs and jabs at the coming consoles. There's also a disturbing trend of some people who barely seem to hide their hope that one console fail.
Having been around for the last several console launches this is little different then most - some actual differences and lots of buzz words. One of the biggest mistakes a person who participates in enthusiast forums can make is assuming that everyone is (or should be) the same issues they are. Some people dismissing the differences as unimportant obviously are doing so based on a personal bias - however this is clearly not true for everyone doing so.
It has nothing to do with console wars dude, at least not for me. If I own both systems and I hear "both versions look excellent and completely on par with each other, barely any differences" and I get the XB1 version at 720p and find out the other's at a much better resolution, I'll be pissed. It's just informational, that's all. I'd personally like to know these things and not have them completely ignored. They're worth mentioning.
Here is what people want:
Gaming journalists to admit that 1080p looks better than 720p, and that as a result of the PS4 being more powerful is more capable of providing those experiences and it has no fucking impact on the quality of gameplay so this isn't an either or problem.
I don't think anyone even cares about the press acknowledging that Sony has better first party studios, just stop trying to downplay the power differences between the consoles. The PS4 is more powerful, FACT. Spit it out and be done with the fence sitting.
Does everyone realise that Watergate was the location of the event and calling each and every minor scandal _______gate makes you sound like an idiot?
A very simple discussion was happening in the enthusiast community and the reaction to it has just been to treat it like an anathema; like technology is not or has not been something critical to our hobby for 30 years.
This is pretty hilarious.
I wonder how you guys would react if they suddenly changed CoD and BF4 to run in 1080p at 60fps by ticking down the graphic settings.
I don't see Adam as a journalist. I don't think he would refer to himself as a journalist either.
I cringed that that too. Native 1080p vs "upresed 1080p"
He didnt directly compare the prices first of all and secondly he certainly did not include camera (that would be much more)
Notsureif
Does everyone realise that Watergate was the location of the event and calling each and every minor scandal _______gate makes you sound like an idiot?
False dichotomy:
Wanting to get the system that is more powerful AND cheaper=you only care about graphics and are a fanboy.
Lots of people seem to suffer from a persecution complex and a lack of introspection. Much has been made recently of the gaming media and their failings to report issues a certain way. Much has been made of commenters on other sites and their seeming disdain for neogaf. Notwithstanding the only conclusion many seem to draw is that everyone else is wrong and only the people on neogaf see the 'truth'.
I've seen a repeated trend where people have accused the gaming media of a double standard - claiming they made a big deal of the differences between PS3 and 360 versions of games, and are now downplaying the differences between the Xbox One and PS4 versions of games. I think this exists more in their memory then in reality. The gaming media did not make a big deal of the the platform differences - people on internet forums did. Some games received slightly higher review scores - something we may well see in this generation.
The other issue I've referred to is the near universal rejection of any outside criticism of neogaf. Like any other site neogaf has it's strengths and weaknesses. However there's a glaring lack of introspection when outside criticisms and suggestions of bias are dismissed without any examination. Personally it's a bit disconcerting to see nearly every thread loaded with dismissive gifs and jabs at the coming consoles. There's also a disturbing trend of some people who barely seem to hide their hope that one console fail.
Having been around for the last several console launches this is little different then most - some actual differences and lots of buzz words. One of the biggest mistakes a person who participates in enthusiast forums can make is assuming that everyone is (or should be) the same issues they are. Some people dismissing the differences as unimportant obviously are doing so based on a personal bias - however this is clearly not true for everyone doing so.
I think it's been pretty obvious that Sessler has been trying to keep things artificially 50/50. Kind of like when there is a Superbowl where one team is clearly better than the other. The media has an invested interest to try and make the game more evenly-matched than it really is.
The color scheme of the channel logo told me all I needed to know.
Watergate is a reference to the scandal, the name has taken on a whole new meaning thanks to dick nixon, but yea i think the resolution gate thing is a tad too dramaticDoes everyone realise that Watergate was the location of the event and calling each and every minor scandal _______gate makes you sound like an idiot?
Did you purposely ignore the part where i added tax to wii u and xbone?Notsureif what?
It's a play on words. The fact you seem to care so much says more about you than it does about the people you're complaining about.