Adam Sessler's: On Xbox One and PS4's Resolutiongate, and Day One Patches

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sure he did, by building his entire philosophical point here on game design/development and gameplay not benefitting from a lack of limitations and ease of development that are indicated by the ease of which resolution and framerate standards are achieved. It shows a complete lack of understanding and vision.

He said specifically how he's most excited about seeing how game design is impacted by the extra computing power. AI, animations, the more backbone parts of the game core have a lot more to work with. It was specifically picking a fight with pure resolution number, and saying that even at 720 or 900p there is still much more happening behind the scenes.

This is why it's completely dissimilar to the wii. Games were straight up neutered in comparison there, when it wasn't outright ignored.
 
The question is, will it be more or less unreadable in a year when the Xbox One has pulled ahead of the PS4 in sales and GAF angrily tries to figure out why the more powerful console hasn't emerged the clear winner?
.
It is nice to dream. At least you are dreaming big.
 
Seeing how gaming journalism has become nonchalant all of a sudden regarding resolution and graphics is very endearing
 
iNWADHOdKV1XV.gif

I don't mind that we disagree with the man's opinion and supposed SOP, but we don't need to be fucking rude about it. Dude was sick on top of being exhausted and with hardly a voice after all the interviews and pieces he conducted.
 
I agree thats why I stay out of these threads like the plague, surprise stuff like this doesn't get locked when it gets out of hand, lol. good post.
Oh they do get locked, and many threads on this topic have been.

But the best way to get variety on a topic is to actually bring up your point and support it, not sit off to the side and call this place an echo chamber. This isn't a point I'm making to you in particular btw.
 
Y'all should probably stop this. It's wrong.

The idea of a minor celebrity in games journalism being strung out on coke at E3 of all places is pretty funny actually. Like he went to a back room with Gerstmann and Keighley and they did a few lines before heading out onto the floor. What's the problem exactly?
 
The idea of a minor celebrity in games journalism being strung out on coke at E3 of all places is pretty funny actually. Like he went to a back room with Gerstmann and Keighley and they did a few lines before heading out onto the floor. What's the problem exactly?
Implying that he's on something while on the clock, based on nothing, you don't see a problem?
 
The question is, will it be more or less unreadable in a year when the Xbox One has pulled ahead of the PS4 in sales and GAF angrily tries to figure out why the more powerful console hasn't emerged the clear winner?

Gaf 1: 'Why doth this happen?'

Gaf 2: 'Twas foretold by MK'

Gaf 1: 'But twas the most powerful of them all!'

Gaf 2: 'Sadly we did not realize: graphics don madder :('
 
The idea of a minor celebrity in games journalism being strung out on coke at E3 of all places is pretty funny actually. Like he went to a back room with Gerstmann and Keighley and they did a few lines before heading out onto the floor. What's the problem exactly?

Because you have no proof and it's slanderous.
 
Implying that he's on something while on the clock, based on nothing, you don't see a problem?

Yes because everyone is taking it really serious and it's going to cost this poor man his reputation. This industry doesn't take kindly to drugs, after all.

No, I don't see a problem.
 
I don't mind that we disagree with the man's opinion and supposed SOP, but we don't need to be fucking rude about it. Dude was sick on top of being exhausted and with hardly a voice after all the interviews and pieces he conducted.
Agree.
We should be dissecting his opinions, not making fun of him on an unnecessary level.
 
All of sudden graphics don't matter now that ms has the the weaker, more expensive console...

I thought this guy was quitting for...reasons.
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.

If course it shouldn't be downplayed but it was never that big a issue to now outside of pc gamers.

I just admit I just enjoy the games whether they be on wiiu , pc or in between. That won't change. This is just a factor in multi plats for me.
 
So that episode ends up .... well next we have a lot of xbox one games content and interview with phil spencer ....

I understand his point of saying its the games that matter. but dont gloss over the fact you're getting the same gameplay effects etc its a multiplatform games which clearly shows the ps4's advantage. He says one line about it.

Say ps4 is clearly much stronger ... if thats what you are worried about apart from exclusives, os , kinect, controller etc. then yeah ps4 is greater value for money and the console to choose. Otherwise just have fun with the games. Such a simple statement to make but the games press keeps constantly glossing over it.
 
It's fucking coke, not child sex tourism. Get over yourselves.

The same poster came into the thread saying sessler is a coked up man child and then posted those 2 gifs. It's more that he's contributing nothing aside from drive by shit post insults.
 
Implying that he's on something while on the clock, based on nothing, you don't see a problem?
I am going to agree a)addiction isn't humorous in the slightest I've been clean 6 yrs and now mentor addicts and b)I feel everyone here ought to be mature enough to rise above "ad hominum" attacks
 
The XBOX ONE costs $100 more than, and is significantly less powerful than, the PS4.
The media is tripping over itself t downplay that simple fact, and it's pathetic.

This is pretty much what pisses me off to no end. The games media's job is to inform readers about the newest games and systems. Downplaying noticeable differences in two of the most hotly anticipated multiplatform releases of the year, with one of those releases (BF4) being billed as a graphical showpiece, doesn't serve my interest but serves the interest to another party. The games media is not informing me, they are spreading FUD and the only thing that hasn't been answered is to whose or what purpose.
 
He said specifically how he's most excited about seeing how game design is impacted by the extra computing power. AI, animations [etc]

Yes he did, and unbeknownst to himself, these viewpoints he's presenting are in direct opposition to each other. It's very shortsighted and out of touch with the issue. I see Adam get in over his head and out of his element a lot when he attempts to represent what he sees as the priority and shift the conversation back to his comfort zones, despite being a great personality with an impeccable skillset for presenting video coverage, and this is an instance of that imo. I saw the same thing happen when he was livestreaming with TotalBiscuit and was met with an informed breakdown of how destructive a closed ecosystem and unchallenged monopoly is to PC development and distribution. He's a fish out of water when he's talking about anything other that narrative, intent and emotion.
 
Yes because everyone is taking it really serious and it's going to cost this poor man his reputation. This industry doesn't take kindly to drugs, after all.

No, I don't see a problem.

Eh, it seems a bit mean. Especially because it's kind of making fun of him while he was in a weak state.
 
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.

If course it shouldn't be downplayed but it was never that big a issue to now outside of pc gamers.

PC master race has to acknowledge PC gaming is a different beast altogether. I love PC gaming for certain things . But sometimes I just like my consoles in my living room. I love playing uncharted surrounded by my friends in the living room. Or fifa 2 on 2 ... so people are concerned with how the consoles compare to each other. And when ive decided I dont want pc to be my primary platform, then the consoles matter. I don't get why people dont realize this.

Yes if I want the best experience of all graphics wise a high end pc is the way to go. But I know i want a console . So im obviously going to compare and contrast to other consoles.
 
I really enjoy Adam Sessler's commentary on video games (reviews, previews, etc.), but he comes across as such a shill when it comes to this whole hardware thing. I don't think anyone is questioning that a game's top priority is to be fun/entertaining and that good graphics don't necessarily equal a good game. But I do think it is important for people to know that not only is the PS4 an objectively more powerful piece of hardware, it is also $100 cheaper.

One other thing I keep noticing on other forums is that many people say that the reason that xbone games are running at a lower resolution is because they have more effects and smoother frame rates than the competition. This is what the masses believe, and the so-called video game journalists refuse to clear this up.
 
He never mentions any resolution lower than 1080p on XBO. This resolution terms he used were "1080p" and "uprezed 1080p", meaning the new name for 720p and 900p from a PR standpoint is now "uprezed 1080p" or "upscaled 1080p".

Interesting language choice indeed. Uprezed 1080P > 1080P. It has both more Rez and more Up.

Personally, I don't see 1080P as a lofty goal. It should be standard this gen, and I'd rather developers drop effects to maintain 1:1 pixel mapping than upscaling.

Upscaling is faux resolution. Just like DVD players that advertised "upscaling", "upconverting" to 1080P. Doesn't make DVDs look like Blu-Ray.
 
PC master race has to acknowledge PC gaming is a different beast altogether. I love PC gaming for certain things . But sometimes I just like my consoles in my living room. I love playing uncharted surrounded by my friends in the living room. Or fifa 2 on 2 ... so people are concerned with how the consoles compare to each other. And when ive decided I dont want pc to be my primary platform, then the consoles matter. I don't get why people dont realize this.

Yes if I want the best experience of all graphics wise a high end pc is the way to go. But I know i want a console . So im obviously going to compare and contrast to other consoles.
Well of course. In that sense there are many factors and this will be a part.

I just end up with all in the end, can't help myself.
 
I'll be curious to see how things shake out post launch. There's no doubt that a lot of journalists seem to be defending Xbox in a big way but what will this ultimately mean?
 
But BF4 runs at a better frame rate on PS4 and a higher resolution makes it easier to spot enemies, so it has better gameplay because of its hardware advantage. When we start to see games that target the same resolution and graphics level then the difference in performance will be significant, which will have an irrefutable impact on gameplay.

If your argument is "gameplay over graphics" then this performance deficit is hugely important. This isn't about resolution alone.
 
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.

If course it shouldn't be downplayed but it was never that big a issue to now outside of pc gamers.

A weaker console costs $100 more.
THAT is the big issue.
Resolution speaks to that difference in power.
 
I'll be curious to see how things shake out post launch. There's no doubt that a lot of journalists seem to be defending Xbox in a big way but what will this ultimately mean?
Male voice: "Those yellow and black signs you see everywhere you look are used to indicate a fallout shelter in buildings."

Female voice: "So you see these signs too, Dr. Black?"

Male voice: "Why sure, Ms. Eh-Rectangular."

Female voice: "Oh I feel better already."

GAF gonna 'splode!
Not really.
Maybe...
 
The XBOX ONE costs $100 more than, and is significantly less powerful than, the PS4.
The media is tripping over itself t downplay that simple fact, and it's pathetic.

Personally I get more value buying the Xbox one cause I don't hate the Kinect and I like having it included from the get go and I get 2 games included for free, one of which I highly intend to play throughout the year. I agree that 1080P is great and who wouldn't want more power? But even with all that, PS4 launch lineup is still lackluster imo, hence me not buying it at launch.
 
He had a rough E3 with very little sleep. His coverage showed his condition getting progressively worse as the show went on.

I was hoping it was this and not "cocain shivers"
laughed hard at that though

As for his opinion, gameplay does matter more, but if it's the same game on two different platforms, especially for people looking forward to said game AND a new system to buy it for (if they're not buying due to exclusives), it's good to know these things.

The video from 4 months ago with his expectation of both new consoles being 1080p/60fps does raise an eyebrow, and with that out there I hope he at least explains what or why he changed his tune if he truly did.

I might not go as far as to say people are being paid off by MS for better imaging, but I do believe MS does need damage control. I've never seen a gaming company need PR damage control like MS has this year. I'd be more likely to theorize that those that help out their imaging get special considerations, possibly things that make their jobs easier, whatever those might be.

All I can ask of the gaming press is they do their jobs and keep us informed for us to allow smart decisions be made based on as much factual info as possible. I'm not going to rely on them, but lots of people will.
 
I have no idea why so many here are developing a persecution complex in regards to the PS4 and gaming journalism. You're the majority, what reason is there to constantly look for and often imagine ways that you think your stance isn't being expressed enough by people who are free to have their own opinions? It seems every day now that an article or journalist's opinion will be posted here and get mobbed for not praising the PS4 enough. Many times the stance will be wildly misinterpreted and that misinterpretation will be ran with. People are acting like there's a steady stream of journalists saying that the power difference "doesn't matter" when I don't know if I've actually seen that said a single time.

When the power of the consoles is discussed it seems that anything less than unrealistically glowing praise of the PS4 is perceived as "downplaying the power difference". Oftentimes the very reasonable opinion is expressed by a gaming site that the obsession some have with the power difference is a bit overblown in regards to determining how much each console will sell. Yet this stance is never considered and saying anything even close to it is written off as "bias" or apologism. Any attempt to discuss the power difference in a wider context where it's treated as anything less than the most important thing ever is immediately discounted. I'm not sure how anybody could not see how out of control the focus on power on this site is. Sure it's worth discussing and a big issue but it's simply not something worth discussing more than everything else combined.

The accusations of bias are becoming completely out of control. There's simply no reason for such a bias to exist in the vast majority of cases people are claiming there is. It's making discussion of articles very difficult as many members here feel a need for every opinion posted to absolutely line up to their own and any attempt to challenge a narrative that has been established here is shut down immediately. That discourages critical thinking, I'm not sure why so many desire views to be homogenized to align with their own when there are multiple valid ways of thinking in nearly every situation. There is no conspiracy in the media to favor one console-maker and thinking such a thing borders on craziness. I welcome diverse views and it's a real shame that some here don't.

This can't be quoted enough. As mentioned by others, big parts of GAF have become unreadable because of this.
 
Sessler never said tech doesn't matter.

You can't downplay the news about resolution and then argue that technology doesn't matter, it's an oxymoron. The difference in resolution is simply the quantifiable difference in technology between the two consoles. Throughout this generation that technological advantage will be used in a variety of different ways. The fact that both COD and BF have decided to use that extra performance to increase resolution is simply a smokescreen for the real issue at hand.
 
But BF4 runs at a better frame rate on PS4 and a higher resolution makes it easier to spot enemies, so it has better gameplay because of its hardware advantage. When we start to see games that target the same resolution and graphics level then the difference in performance will be significant, which will have an irrefutable impact on gameplay.

If your argument is "gameplay over graphics" then this performance deficit is hugely important. This isn't about resolution alone.

Even if you disregard the enemy spotting, we are talking about the same game. Why would the game with worse resolution and less graphical effects play better than the game with more effects and higher resolution? The argument makes no sense at all. We are comparing apples to apples, not apples to oranges. Would you rather have the nice beautiful apple or would you rather eat the bruised one?
 
Ok, no one find it fucking weird that every major outlet is making apologist responses for Microsoft? What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Like do these people not understand that it's the same game, one version just looks better? Everyone of these "resolutiongate" responses always delves into "I want the games artistic design to be more interesting rather than it look better than the competitors," no fucking shit but that's not the point being discussed here.

It IS odd. I don't remember them doing the same with the early PS3 multi-plats. In fact, they were pretty friggin' HARSH. Oh well. Now, if the XB1 versions also suffer noticeably in PERFORMANCE (apart from designed frame rate differences) I definitely expect the journalists to buck up and report on the subject fairly. We will see.
 
I was hoping it was this and not "cocain shivers"
laughed hard at that though

As for his opinion, gameplay does matter more, but if it's the same game on two different platforms, especially for people looking forward to said game AND a new system to buy it for (if they're not buying due to exclusives), it's good to know these things.

The video from 4 months ago with his expectation of both new consoles being 1080p/60fps does raise an eyebrow, and with that out there I hope he at least explains what or why he changed his tune if he truly did.

I might not go as far as to say people are being paid off by MS for better imaging, but I do believe MS does need damage control. I've never seen a gaming company need PR damage control like MS has this year. I'd be more likely to theorize that those that help out their imaging get special considerations, possibly things that make their jobs easier, whatever those might be.

All I can ask of the gaming press is they do their jobs and keep us informed for us to allow smart decisions be made based on as much factual info as possible. I'm not going to rely on them, but lots of people will.
After re watching the video, I don't think it was as much a defense of the xb1 as much as it was a defense of both next gen systems. As time goes on, resolutions will drop. But game design will improve. And ultimately, that is more important. I would rather play bf4 with 64 players at 900p or even 720p than play with 24 players at 1080p.
 
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.

If course it shouldn't be downplayed but it was never that big a issue to now outside of pc gamers.

I just admit I just enjoy the games whether they be on wiiu , pc or in between. That won't change. This is just a factor in multi plats for me.

People stuck with lesser versions because cost is an issue. The PS4 is basically a mid-tier gaming pc with some customized bits. You can't build a mid-level gaming PC with an OS, graphics card, motherboard, bluray drive, 8gb DDR5, etc for $400. You *might* be able to build one for $500, but the OS might be the sticking point.

People's problem is paying $100 more for the inferior hardware, not the resolution itself. If the XB1 was only $350 I doubt the outcry would be nearly as vehement.
 
it doesn't. it's the gaming press who are saying, "they don't matter". they do. a game is the sum of its parts. both versions are the exact same experience so that's out of the gate in terms of comparison. now, there are graphical differences (bf4 having lower resolution and lacking global illumination system, plus running at a lower average framerate). that's where comparisons come in because that's where comparisons can be made. and why are comparisons being made? because these are both valued at $60 no matter what console.

it's the constant and massive downplaying of these differences that is such a copout. remember when all these "journalists" pointed out every damn difference the ps3 version of a multiplat had in their reviews? "the ps3 version looks washed out. the ps3 version had some hiccups. the ps3 version had less vibrant colours. you are better off playing the xbox 360 version if you want the best version out there outside the pc.


this takes the icing on the cake:
http://www.g4tv.com/videos/43049/mx-vs-atv-reflex-playstation-3-review/
"Get the lowdown on the PlayStation 3 version of MX vs. ATV Reflex in this review. Adam Sessler and Morgan Webb discuss the drawbacks of the PS3 version of MX vs. ATV Reflex and reveal the game's lower score."

360 version = 3/5 stars
ps3 version = 2/5 stars for being graphically inferior

or this:
http://www.giantbomb.com/reviews/bayonetta-review/1900-249/?review_id=249
Much of the potential of Bayonetta--potential that's realized on the Xbox 360--is lost to technical issues on the PS3.
(yes, that's the subtext of the review).

or what about this?
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/247305/red-dead-redemptions-sub-hd-ps3-display-analysis/
"Its resolution is 640 by 1152, compared to the Xbox 360's 720 by 1280 pixels. At first glance you might say that this is only a difference of "80 pixels," but in reality, when the missing area is calculated, the PS3 suffers an 184,320 pixel deficit - or 20 per cent lower than the Xbox 360 version. This rendering resolution is then upscaled by the PS3 to be displayed on your screen."

or how about this, arstechnica?
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2010/05/read-dead-redemption-360-vs-ps3-our-thoughts/
"This is non-scientific, but after playing an hour of both games, and switching back and forth between the two systems on our display, it's clear that the 360 version has quite the graphical advantage. It's sharper, with much less aliasing. The faces of the characters were clearer in the opening section. Gameplay sections likewise looked better, with smoother graphics across the board. The PlayStation 3 version looked impressive, but there was a noticeable jump in quality while playing on the 360.

Keep in mind that the game doesn't look bad on the PS3—not by any stretch—but based on our time with the game and direct comparisons, the 360 version looks better. If you purchase the PS3 version of the game you're not going to be let down, but if you have the choice, pick up a copy for the 360.

Here's another reason to buy the game for the Xbox 360: if you dislike playing with strangers, there are 16 Ars Technica members in the game's thread playing online with the 360 version, compared to three on the PS3. If you're going to be playing, sign up!"


hypocrites.
I can't wait to see scores this gen. will they uphold the same standard or will they make excuses..
 
I'll be curious to see how things shake out post launch. There's no doubt that a lot of journalists seem to be defending Xbox in a big way but what will this ultimately mean?

I will say that the "Not a big difference" sentiment isn't the worst thing for sony. I mean it's not a negative against them per say. But it isn't really being presented as a plus by alot of the press, so it seems it'll be pretty neutral effect, with some benefit to ms in terms of not getting a big negative mark.

At the worst least people might think "The ps4 is slightly better than the one, plus it's 100$ less. Though you have to factor in the kinect."

The ps4 seems to be getting a pretty good push in terms of preorders though, so it seems to be a bit in the lead at the moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom