Two times in the same thread? Just stop already.
Two times in the same thread? Just stop already.
Sure he did, by building his entire philosophical point here on game design/development and gameplay not benefitting from a lack of limitations and ease of development that are indicated by the ease of which resolution and framerate standards are achieved. It shows a complete lack of understanding and vision.
It is nice to dream. At least you are dreaming big.The question is, will it be more or less unreadable in a year when the Xbox One has pulled ahead of the PS4 in sales and GAF angrily tries to figure out why the more powerful console hasn't emerged the clear winner?
.
^ Does he have to pee in that gif?
This FUD train needs to stop! 720p is crap. It is unacceptable for a $500 console!
Y'all should probably stop this. It's wrong.
Oh they do get locked, and many threads on this topic have been.I agree thats why I stay out of these threads like the plague, surprise stuff like this doesn't get locked when it gets out of hand, lol. good post.
Cool, but doesn't change the fact that there was a 500 dollar console available.![]()
Y'all should probably stop this. It's wrong.
Implying that he's on something while on the clock, based on nothing, you don't see a problem?The idea of a minor celebrity in games journalism being strung out on coke at E3 of all places is pretty funny actually. Like he went to a back room with Gerstmann and Keighley and they did a few lines before heading out onto the floor. What's the problem exactly?
The question is, will it be more or less unreadable in a year when the Xbox One has pulled ahead of the PS4 in sales and GAF angrily tries to figure out why the more powerful console hasn't emerged the clear winner?
The idea of a minor celebrity in games journalism being strung out on coke at E3 of all places is pretty funny actually. Like he went to a back room with Gerstmann and Keighley and they did a few lines before heading out onto the floor. What's the problem exactly?
I don't mind that we disagree with the man's opinion and supposed SOP, but we don't need to be fucking rude about it. Dude was sick on top of being exhausted and with hardly a voice after all the interviews and pieces he conducted.
Implying that he's on something while on the clock, based on nothing, you don't see a problem?
Agree.I don't mind that we disagree with the man's opinion and supposed SOP, but we don't need to be fucking rude about it. Dude was sick on top of being exhausted and with hardly a voice after all the interviews and pieces he conducted.
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.All of sudden graphics don't matter now that ms has the the weaker, more expensive console...
I thought this guy was quitting for...reasons.
It's fucking coke, not child sex tourism. Get over yourselves.
I am going to agree a)addiction isn't humorous in the slightest I've been clean 6 yrs and now mentor addicts and b)I feel everyone here ought to be mature enough to rise above "ad hominum" attacksImplying that he's on something while on the clock, based on nothing, you don't see a problem?
Two times in the same thread? Just stop already.
The XBOX ONE costs $100 more than, and is significantly less powerful than, the PS4.
The media is tripping over itself t downplay that simple fact, and it's pathetic.
He said specifically how he's most excited about seeing how game design is impacted by the extra computing power. AI, animations [etc]
Yes because everyone is taking it really serious and it's going to cost this poor man his reputation. This industry doesn't take kindly to drugs, after all.
No, I don't see a problem.
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.
If course it shouldn't be downplayed but it was never that big a issue to now outside of pc gamers.
He never mentions any resolution lower than 1080p on XBO. This resolution terms he used were "1080p" and "uprezed 1080p", meaning the new name for 720p and 900p from a PR standpoint is now "uprezed 1080p" or "upscaled 1080p".
Well of course. In that sense there are many factors and this will be a part.PC master race has to acknowledge PC gaming is a different beast altogether. I love PC gaming for certain things . But sometimes I just like my consoles in my living room. I love playing uncharted surrounded by my friends in the living room. Or fifa 2 on 2 ... so people are concerned with how the consoles compare to each other. And when ive decided I dont want pc to be my primary platform, then the consoles matter. I don't get why people dont realize this.
Yes if I want the best experience of all graphics wise a high end pc is the way to go. But I know i want a console . So im obviously going to compare and contrast to other consoles.
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.
If course it shouldn't be downplayed but it was never that big a issue to now outside of pc gamers.
Nope, not at all. Especially if you read between the lines when the 360 was the "hot" thing compared to the other platforms.Ok, no one find it fucking weird that every major outlet is making apologist responses for Microsoft?
So much tinfoil. I just don't see things like that.Nope, not at all. Especially if you read between the lines when the 360 was the "hot" thing compared to the other platforms.
As a PS3 guy to be fair Sony's exclusives dominated but if it was a multiplat 360 was the definitive version.Nope, not at all. Especially if you read between the lines when the 360 was the "hot" thing compared to the other platforms.
Male voice: "Those yellow and black signs you see everywhere you look are used to indicate a fallout shelter in buildings."I'll be curious to see how things shake out post launch. There's no doubt that a lot of journalists seem to be defending Xbox in a big way but what will this ultimately mean?
The XBOX ONE costs $100 more than, and is significantly less powerful than, the PS4.
The media is tripping over itself t downplay that simple fact, and it's pathetic.
He had a rough E3 with very little sleep. His coverage showed his condition getting progressively worse as the show went on.
I have no idea why so many here are developing a persecution complex in regards to the PS4 and gaming journalism. You're the majority, what reason is there to constantly look for and often imagine ways that you think your stance isn't being expressed enough by people who are free to have their own opinions? It seems every day now that an article or journalist's opinion will be posted here and get mobbed for not praising the PS4 enough. Many times the stance will be wildly misinterpreted and that misinterpretation will be ran with. People are acting like there's a steady stream of journalists saying that the power difference "doesn't matter" when I don't know if I've actually seen that said a single time.
When the power of the consoles is discussed it seems that anything less than unrealistically glowing praise of the PS4 is perceived as "downplaying the power difference". Oftentimes the very reasonable opinion is expressed by a gaming site that the obsession some have with the power difference is a bit overblown in regards to determining how much each console will sell. Yet this stance is never considered and saying anything even close to it is written off as "bias" or apologism. Any attempt to discuss the power difference in a wider context where it's treated as anything less than the most important thing ever is immediately discounted. I'm not sure how anybody could not see how out of control the focus on power on this site is. Sure it's worth discussing and a big issue but it's simply not something worth discussing more than everything else combined.
The accusations of bias are becoming completely out of control. There's simply no reason for such a bias to exist in the vast majority of cases people are claiming there is. It's making discussion of articles very difficult as many members here feel a need for every opinion posted to absolutely line up to their own and any attempt to challenge a narrative that has been established here is shut down immediately. That discourages critical thinking, I'm not sure why so many desire views to be homogenized to align with their own when there are multiple valid ways of thinking in nearly every situation. There is no conspiracy in the media to favor one console-maker and thinking such a thing borders on craziness. I welcome diverse views and it's a real shame that some here don't.
Sessler never said tech doesn't matter.
But BF4 runs at a better frame rate on PS4 and a higher resolution makes it easier to spot enemies, so it has better gameplay because of its hardware advantage. When we start to see games that target the same resolution and graphics level then the difference in performance will be significant, which will have an irrefutable impact on gameplay.
If your argument is "gameplay over graphics" then this performance deficit is hugely important. This isn't about resolution alone.
Ok, no one find it fucking weird that every major outlet is making apologist responses for Microsoft? What the fuck is wrong with these people?
Like do these people not understand that it's the same game, one version just looks better? Everyone of these "resolutiongate" responses always delves into "I want the games artistic design to be more interesting rather than it look better than the competitors," no fucking shit but that's not the point being discussed here.
After re watching the video, I don't think it was as much a defense of the xb1 as much as it was a defense of both next gen systems. As time goes on, resolutions will drop. But game design will improve. And ultimately, that is more important. I would rather play bf4 with 64 players at 900p or even 720p than play with 24 players at 1080p.I was hoping it was this and not "cocain shivers"laughed hard at that though
As for his opinion, gameplay does matter more, but if it's the same game on two different platforms, especially for people looking forward to said game AND a new system to buy it for (if they're not buying due to exclusives), it's good to know these things.
The video from 4 months ago with his expectation of both new consoles being 1080p/60fps does raise an eyebrow, and with that out there I hope he at least explains what or why he changed his tune if he truly did.
I might not go as far as to say people are being paid off by MS for better imaging, but I do believe MS does need damage control. I've never seen a gaming company need PR damage control like MS has this year. I'd be more likely to theorize that those that help out their imaging get special considerations, possibly things that make their jobs easier, whatever those might be.
All I can ask of the gaming press is they do their jobs and keep us informed for us to allow smart decisions be made based on as much factual info as possible. I'm not going to rely on them, but lots of people will.
Conversely it's amazing how many people who've people happy to stick with the lesser versions, never worried, never touched pc, now consider resolution to be the holy grail of gaming.
If course it shouldn't be downplayed but it was never that big a issue to now outside of pc gamers.
I just admit I just enjoy the games whether they be on wiiu , pc or in between. That won't change. This is just a factor in multi plats for me.
I can't wait to see scores this gen. will they uphold the same standard or will they make excuses..it doesn't. it's the gaming press who are saying, "they don't matter". they do. a game is the sum of its parts. both versions are the exact same experience so that's out of the gate in terms of comparison. now, there are graphical differences (bf4 having lower resolution and lacking global illumination system, plus running at a lower average framerate). that's where comparisons come in because that's where comparisons can be made. and why are comparisons being made? because these are both valued at $60 no matter what console.
it's the constant and massive downplaying of these differences that is such a copout. remember when all these "journalists" pointed out every damn difference the ps3 version of a multiplat had in their reviews? "the ps3 version looks washed out. the ps3 version had some hiccups. the ps3 version had less vibrant colours. you are better off playing the xbox 360 version if you want the best version out there outside the pc.
this takes the icing on the cake:
http://www.g4tv.com/videos/43049/mx-vs-atv-reflex-playstation-3-review/
"Get the lowdown on the PlayStation 3 version of MX vs. ATV Reflex in this review. Adam Sessler and Morgan Webb discuss the drawbacks of the PS3 version of MX vs. ATV Reflex and reveal the game's lower score."
360 version = 3/5 stars
ps3 version = 2/5 stars for being graphically inferior
or this:
http://www.giantbomb.com/reviews/bayonetta-review/1900-249/?review_id=249
Much of the potential of Bayonetta--potential that's realized on the Xbox 360--is lost to technical issues on the PS3.
(yes, that's the subtext of the review).
or what about this?
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/247305/red-dead-redemptions-sub-hd-ps3-display-analysis/
"Its resolution is 640 by 1152, compared to the Xbox 360's 720 by 1280 pixels. At first glance you might say that this is only a difference of "80 pixels," but in reality, when the missing area is calculated, the PS3 suffers an 184,320 pixel deficit - or 20 per cent lower than the Xbox 360 version. This rendering resolution is then upscaled by the PS3 to be displayed on your screen."
or how about this, arstechnica?
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2010/05/read-dead-redemption-360-vs-ps3-our-thoughts/
"This is non-scientific, but after playing an hour of both games, and switching back and forth between the two systems on our display, it's clear that the 360 version has quite the graphical advantage. It's sharper, with much less aliasing. The faces of the characters were clearer in the opening section. Gameplay sections likewise looked better, with smoother graphics across the board. The PlayStation 3 version looked impressive, but there was a noticeable jump in quality while playing on the 360.
Keep in mind that the game doesn't look bad on the PS3not by any stretchbut based on our time with the game and direct comparisons, the 360 version looks better. If you purchase the PS3 version of the game you're not going to be let down, but if you have the choice, pick up a copy for the 360.
Here's another reason to buy the game for the Xbox 360: if you dislike playing with strangers, there are 16 Ars Technica members in the game's thread playing online with the 360 version, compared to three on the PS3. If you're going to be playing, sign up!"
hypocrites.
I'll be curious to see how things shake out post launch. There's no doubt that a lot of journalists seem to be defending Xbox in a big way but what will this ultimately mean?