HerbertFish
Member
Girls with a little meat and hips should be the most ideal too. Though 50 pound models are what is generally considered the hottest today. Seems like it's just media shaping perceptions.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Girls with body hair are disgusting
- Thread starter Scofield94941
- Start date
- Status
Panthalassic
Member
Sorry that hair naturally grows on people's bodies. I'm not too fond of leg or underarm hair but I am quite fond of my arm hair. Sorry I'm not to your tastes OP 
terrisus
Member
Seriously, this.
radios shipping overview
Member
I'm glad a thread like this can backfire in the current era of GAF. Times have changed.
The whole concept of hairless bodies has really only cropped up in the last generation or so. Anyone who believes in such things is merely following what everyone else says is "acceptable". I believe in accepting people for what they are, rather than what society "says" they should be.
My ex gf naturally had no leg/arm hair though, so she didn't have to shave them. Her brother didn't have any leg hair either(noticed when he was wearing shorts in summer), so guess it was something genetic.
Accepting != attracted.
I don't care if people don't shave. I can accept that, but it's still disgusting to me.
Accepting != attracted.
I don't care if people don't shave. I can accept that, but it's still disgusting to me.
Cow Mengde
Banned
Drunk thread? Drunk thread.
freenudemacusers
Member
totally with you op
Can someone provide evidence to this?
Pubic hair signifies you've gone through puberty and your sexuality has been 'awakened'.
As for modern humans - I don't remember the last Greek or Roman statue (over 2000 years old) that had pubic hair or any hair at all (besides head) - male or female - do you?
AyaisMUsikWhore
Member
Yes it is. At the end of the day. Women can shave and call it a day. Men don't want to shave hairy bellys, backs or ass. However some women will accept them the way they are. For some guys, women have to be perfect before they can even accept a little bit of leg hair. There's a big difference. Kind of like women who date fat guys but it's not completely accepting the other way.
Tesseract
Banned
yeah but that's just because hair is a pain in thy ash to sculpt.
Mercury Land-Snake
Member
Landing strips are damn sexy.
I love me some old school jenny. I gladly would bring some floss with her. Well more floss.
goldenpp72
Member
This topic blows me away, literally every male I have ever met would agree body hair on women is unappealing, and every girl I know shaves most of their body. This topic would have you think most women have hairy legs and and arm pits when going out. In America at least, you will almost never see a pretty girl with hair visible aside maybe their arms in my experience. Though I'd not say disgusting, just it looks off putting. Then again I don't think hairy men look good either, just depends on volume and their general look.
rooflapimp
Banned
What a load of shit.
Because all women are 100% excepting of men whatever they look like, and all men demand women to shave.
fuzzyreactor
Banned
yea, it's a turn off but pretty much every girl has hair down there. Luckily my girl keeps both of her holes nice and smooth so i can give them good lickings.
Next time you want to make an observation like this one, try couching it in a less judgemental way. "I am disgusted by body hair on women" would still generate discussion and dissent with your opinion but probably less people would be offended with you and calling you a jerk.
It's not some sort of terrible crime to have preferences about the grooming and dress of a potential boyfriend/girlfriend, but there's no reason to act like not shaving is an odious personal habit unless you work for Procter & Gamble.
Your friends are going to set you up with the hairiest girl they can find, by the way.
It's not some sort of terrible crime to have preferences about the grooming and dress of a potential boyfriend/girlfriend, but there's no reason to act like not shaving is an odious personal habit unless you work for Procter & Gamble.
Your friends are going to set you up with the hairiest girl they can find, by the way.
Too easy.
Doesn't bother me unless it's excessive.
This reminded me of a funny story though.
Back at this job I worked at years ago, there was this pretty hot girl that worked there.
Anyways, she was wearing a sorta short shirt one day, and you could see her lower back (which lo and behold, she had some hair there; not much though).
I told this guy I worked with about it and he kinda freaked out saying how nasty that was, and I'm just kinda standing there telling him, "You can't be serious. Really?".
This reminded me of a funny story though.
Back at this job I worked at years ago, there was this pretty hot girl that worked there.
Anyways, she was wearing a sorta short shirt one day, and you could see her lower back (which lo and behold, she had some hair there; not much though).
I told this guy I worked with about it and he kinda freaked out saying how nasty that was, and I'm just kinda standing there telling him, "You can't be serious. Really?".
Not really: it was a Greek and Roman ideal to be as smooth as an Olympic swimmer. At the baths you'd have a slave pluck the hair from your armpits. It was also an ideal to have a smaller penis: the idea being that a man's seed would be fresher as it had travelled less. Large penises were objects to make fun of. The more you know!...
Oh - ladies shouldn't shave their underarms, according to the classic The Joy of Sex: lessens their scent, the pheromones and all that.
To be honest, I've no problem with hair on a lady. Just keep everything in check, like one does with the hair on one's head. A tuft under the arms and, er, down below is sexy! As for hairy legs I've no problem with them: I've shaved mine a few times (for science!) and it's a total pain in the arse - and, of course, there are such things as opaque tights. (Not that you notice hairy legs unless you're close enough to be intimate.) If you prefer your partner clean-shaven then do the work for them, I say.
PhoenixDark
Banned
Guessing the OP hasn't had sex with a hairy woman. The friction and tingling>penetration.
I never get used to it, so it always feels like a new experience. Cowgirl with your hands under her arm pits, make sure to rub them...good lord.
I never get used to it, so it always feels like a new experience. Cowgirl with your hands under her arm pits, make sure to rub them...good lord.
AyaisMUsikWhore
Member
In the back of everyone's mind, yes. No one wants to admit it but it's true. It's just society and how sexual appeal works. It's popular or extremely normal for women to shave. It's not for men to shave. It's manly for men to not shave. On the other hand, it is not attractive if a women doesn't. She can't go wolfing around town and some guys would still want her. This thread is the exact definition of that. So in that case, yes women are more accepting. We do take the hair and everything because we understand it's what makes men, men even if we don't 100% like it. It doesn't work the other way around. If It did, this thread wouldn't exist. I do also believe that us women are more driven to personalities more than looks. Just because, you guys all see that hot ass girl with the ugliest dude and still ask yourself Why?". Even assholes too.
Frankly, its ridiculouus imho. I mean, i spend a good portion of my day making sure my body is acceptable to women, be it gym time, tan time, or educational and career pursuits so that women can feel that theyve made the right decision in hooking their anchor to me. At the very least, then, get rid of the body hair. Wear some Louboutin's. Dont dismiss sexual fantasies out of hand. Seems only fair and reciprocal. I dunno, thats just me and its been a formula thats worked.
rooflapimp
Banned
It's a lot easier for less attractive women to be picked up by guys than the other way around.
cubicle47b
Member
It certainly wasn't the most tactful thing to say, but it's not like most people wouldn't find a woman with chest hair off-putting. Few people want to see a guy with a lot of neck/shoulder/back hair either. Luckily, these things are easily dealt with unlike, say, going bald.
Yeah pretty much. The amount of people in this thread jumping on people that find arm/leg hair on women unattractive is kinda freaking me out. I can't honestly say I've ever met a guy who liked it. Disgusting is certainly not the best way to word it, but, I can't say I find chest hair on a woman attractive either, so I guess feel free to lash out at me for having a preference.
What's more interesting though is the amount of people this late into the thread that apparently didn't bother to read the first post and think this is a thread about pubic hair. I mean the OP clearly mentioned arm and chest hair on women.
Hrmmm...I don't mind hairy arms but a hairy butt/back/chest/face? Yeah that does get noticed in a negative fashion. But more in a pity fashion. Like I knew a girl that had amazing tits. They were just huge for her small frame but she was modest and kept them covered. Then one day she for a shirt that was slightly more low cut and while her chest hair was way shorter than mine it was more plentiful and I thought to myself "Man, poor girl."
Or a friend posted a pick of his graduating daughter and she had nearly as thick a mustache as me if I don't shave for a day and again the same thought.
But let's not pretend that this is something that only men do. While some women like a hairy chest, most of the male chests you see in the movies are totally smooth. Women don't like a hairy butt anymore than a guy does. Legs is 50/50, I find. Some of my female friends like a guy's legs to be hairless but others find it too feminine.
Or a friend posted a pick of his graduating daughter and she had nearly as thick a mustache as me if I don't shave for a day and again the same thought.
But let's not pretend that this is something that only men do. While some women like a hairy chest, most of the male chests you see in the movies are totally smooth. Women don't like a hairy butt anymore than a guy does. Legs is 50/50, I find. Some of my female friends like a guy's legs to be hairless but others find it too feminine.
Not attractive != disgusting
I'm not attracted to certain body features myself, but I certainly don't consider them "disgusting", they just don't do anything for me.
And I sure as hell wouldn't be such a dick as to go around advertising it, either. You, sir, are an asshole.
SquiddyCracker
Banned
Jesus, PD.
Kitsunebaby
Member
No one's saying that you have to be attracted to everything, and it's fine to express your preferences, but to imply that a person is disgusting and that there's something wrong with them when it's a perfectly natural and common trait is just stupidly insensitive.
It'd be like me saying, "Blond hair and blue eyes are disgusting! Get that shit fixed, people!" just because I have a preference for darker features. Making people feel bad about themselves because they don't line up with your ideals is just plain mean.
This, basically
It's okay to have a preference, but you don't need to call people disgusting.
You can think something is disgusting or extremely off-putting, but its best to keep it to yourself. No use hurting people's feelings over it.
ryutaro's mama
Member
Speak on it.
OP is entitled to his opinions, but his opinion was incredibly insensitive and poorly worded.
Jesus, you still don't get it huh
LaserBuddha
Member
Body hair really does live in the spectrum of "physical features it's okay to be discerning about", dude.
ScreenSplitter
Member
So she turned you down huh? It's okay OP. It's okay.
- Status