Giving a BJ...anyone else feel like it's the greatest feeling in the world?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because apparently it's rude to claim that people who like doing things with people from their same gender aren't straight.

I'm going to claim I'm a firefighter, and if people have an issue with that, then well, that's offensive.

Nothing rustles my jimmies like counterfeit firefighters, offence be damned.
 
I wouldn't say it's rude. More like dreadfully simple-minded and overly fixated on labels that don't even begin to scratch the surface of how complex people can be.

Considering that bisexuals can cover a huge range of different people with different sexual habits/behaviors, I don't really think calling someone a bisexual suggests that people are not complex
 
I said I was a cinephile.

Yo but you saw the last transformers. You don't actually care about film as art. You say.

Am I real cinephile?

The correct answer is who gives a shit. People can just do and say whatever.

Labels are silly.
Ok so you are saying labels have no use whatsoever? Just so we're clear.
 
Ok so you are saying labels have no use whatsoever? Just so we're clear.
When it comes to sex and incredibly personal life decisions? Sure why not?

It's his life and his business. He'll describe himself however he wants. Whether that translates into the same words with the same definitions it has no consequence to you unless you're looking to be his partner, at which point I'm sure he'd be happy to explain it all very fully to you.
 
Straight is a label too though. Let's be honest, it doesn't matter when it doesn't apply to you. The second you need to describe your sexual orientation to someone you're glad labels exist.

and when he's looking for a partner he'll describe himself however he sees fit but the folks in here insisting he's one thing or the other have no reason to do so. forcing a label on him benefits no one unless you feel like you're helping him discover his latent homosexuality or something, which is moronic.
 
Ok so you are saying labels have no use whatsoever? Just so we're clear.

on a dating site profile? sure. forcing a label on someone else? no, it serves no purpose and comes off as slightly homophobic to insist that people who don't identify as gay have to gay because of one experience or another. if someone were actually gay and claimed to be straight then so what? it's their loss if it gets in the way of their life. let them identify how they want.
 
Because apparently it's rude to claim that people who like doing things with people from their same gender aren't straight.

I'm going to claim I'm a firefighter, and if people have an issue with that, then well, that's offensive.

That's a daft comparison.
 
Because sexual labels provide info about that person's sexual habits, and that can be useful to a person?
It's not really useful here though is it? Especially because OP has labelled himself as straight. The fixation with telling him otherwise comes off as pretty strange.
 
It's not really useful here though is it? Especially because OP has labelled himself as straight. The fixation with telling him otherwise comes off as pretty strange.


The reason everyone is fixated is because op starts a thread about giving a bj, loving it and said he wasn't gay. I know we're supposed be super enlightened about this stuff can't you see why this worthy of discussion?
 
It's not really useful here though is it? Especially because OP has labelled himself as straight. The fixation with telling him otherwise comes off as pretty strange.
No but he seemed to be saying labels about sexuality in general. And I think the anger about labeling the guy when it's none of the labelers business is strange, when the OP doesn't even seem to be bothered by it. OP even admitted that they could be right.
And from, what I have read, I don't think he has a total understanding of what falls under being considered bisexual. It doesn't matter if he wasn't sexually aroused by the BJ, and it doesn't matter if he is sexually attracted to women, He can still be considered a bisexual
 
on a dating site profile? sure. forcing a label on someone else? no, it serves no purpose and comes off as slightly homophobic to insist that people who don't identify as gay have to gay because of one experience or another. if someone were actually gay and claimed to be straight then so what? it's their loss if it gets in the way of their life. let them identify how they want.
Homophobic? I'd wager it's more homophobic to not want to identify as bisexual despite enjoying things that lend credence to the notion that they are.
 
The reason everyone is fixated is because op starts a thread about giving a bj, loving it and said he wasn't gay. I know we're supposed be super enlightened about this stuff can't you see why this worthy of discussion?
I can see why people brought it up, sure. It's the refusal of some posters to accept it as possible that he's straight despite him saying so that seems weird to me. The way people have gone on about it is a bit much too and I doubt it'd be helpful if he was going through issues with his sexuality.
 
OP were you going to town on this guy's meat missile? I'm talking about using both hands, heavy panting, sucking the soul outta that tip. SLURP SLURP SLUUUUUURP!

Stroke the shaft, cradle the balls, and swallow the gravy!



Anyways, I never gave a BJ but I have received my fair share of them. Holy moly are they the best feeling ever. Even better when they swallow your load.
 
ibxTNkc8el9zxf.gif

my reaction as soon as I read the OP in regards to anticipation for this thread's conversation direction.
 
Yes, thank you. It's sadly common for people to impose labels on other people's sexuality based on their misunderstanding of sexual identity. Your orientation is a matter of what you're attracted to and how you see yourself rather than who you have sex with and how. I've seen men accused of being gay for preferring anal sex with women and women only, and others for saying they enjoy giving themselves a prostate massage. It's disheartening to see so much confusion about such an integral part of the human personality.

There seems to be this weird idea that for straight men one same sex encounter makes them gay, yet for gay men, even after several opposite sex encounters they're still gay. Apparently it's not like being a vegetarian or a Christian, where you can eat a piece of bacon or covet your neighbor's ass and still be considered part of the club.

Well said. We should be frank and admit that the double standard has its root in misogyny. In a patriarchal society, any sex acts associated with women or femininity are thought to 'taint' a man. Being "topped" in anyway, performing oral sex - these are viewed as submissive and therefore femine acts. This line of thinking has been taken to such a bizarre extreme that even cunnilingus was viewed as "gay" in some cultures (remember that episode of the Sopranos?).

On the other hand, in a patriarchal society, a homosexual man can not reclaim his heterosexuality by sleeping with women because he has already feminized himself through sexual submission.
 
You are just realizing the bisexual potential that human beings were born to fulfill.

Maybe I'm weird, but I would have zero interest in being on the receiving end (and vice versa).
 
If you give yourself a handjob is that masturbation or homosexual?

If you give yourself a blow job is that masturbation or homosexual?

If you clone yourself and have sex with the clone is that masturbation or homosexual?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom