LordKasual
Banned
I think we mostly agree in that we both recognize that there is the existence of a double standard in this country in the way society responds to the actions of white people versus black people. I think where we're disagreeing is that you believe simplifying the nuance, reasoning, and terms for why that is somehow gives black people a longer leash to commit heinous acts when that isn't the case at all, just like differentiating between different degrees of murder doesn't mean someone isn't dead. You bring up BLM vs. ALM which I think is actually a more pertinent example to the discussion than you think. Everyone agrees that all lives have some inherent value, but the reality is the black lives mattering needs to be stated and reinforced because American society does not fully value them regardless of the former ideal. Just like there is a need for a movement that specifies that black lives matter, there is a need to have discussions and conversations about the etymology and inner workings of racism and how individuals must navigate these systems due to the way they look and their subsequent experiences without angrily defaulting to "No; all hatred is equal!" when people are having these discussions.
This is kind of complicated to respond to, because i actually agree with everything you're saying...the only thing i disagree with is the method in which we choose to convey what we're talking about right here to those whom the concept isn't obvious.
I feel like the fact that All Lives Matter is even a thing that's taken seriously shows just how bad the issue really is. We're in a situation where people are literally being murdered on camera and people have been conditioned to look the other way and doubt the victim, while attempting to omit racial factors entirely. And if racial factors ARE brought into the conversation, you have one half of people arguing that it's bullshit, some tiny portion arguing that he/she probably did something to deserve it, and the system is slanted so hard that it doesn't even take much to cause this to snowball into something that nobody can agree or compromise on, and still ends in the victim's family basically having to just deal with it. It's ammo for one side, another grievance to the another, and nothing moves anywhere. As a minority, when people talk about racism and the balance of power, the only thing I can really think about is how fucked the situation is. Sociological definitions of words like "racism" are worthless to me if people are adverse to understanding that concept in the first place....not because I believe the definition is worthless, but because I know it's ineffective where it should matter the most.
Thats why I said it's a losing strategy. Calling all white people racist is coming from some truth, but that truth will never cause any penetration where it's needed. Saying all hate isn't equal is a true statement, but that truth will never cause any penetration where it's needed. The atmosphere in which we have racial debates in this country is defensive as fuck, the media is just too good at deflecting and manipulating.
And since we're talking about a difference in power here....I'd just like to point out that that "truth bombs" just do....not....fucking work. Systemic racism has like a 50Lv head start, America is like +255 TruthDef, we immune to that shit now and that counter rate is way too good.
So yeah, my only real problem has to do with how we go about approaching the message. I don't really have any answers of course....but I can see that what we're doing isn't enough. Saying something like "all white people are racist", or "Black people can't commit truly racist crimes"...even if you back it up with logic...it's just going to bounce off most people. It's assuming that all people who hear the message are the type to seek out the truth about something they don't really have to care about. And that assumption is wrong.