What's good about that? The kid is only 10 years old. He shouldn't have to spend the rest of his life behind bars because of something he did when he was 10.
Murder is never forgivable. That said, I want to know if this child was being abused.
What's good about that? The kid is only 10 years old. He shouldn't have to spend the rest of his life behind bars because of something he did when he was 10.
Murder is never forgivable.
It most definitely is in some cases, where mental illness is concerned and where circumstances forced the situation to happen. What if the kid was being molested or beaten? Or what if he has severe autism? Should he still go to a federal prison? Sadly, some think he should.
Nah lock him up he's 10 whole years old that's old enough to know better apparently.
Those aren't murder. This was. He beat an old woman to death. How can you forgive that?
Pretty sure I knew not to murder people at 10.
Murder is never forgivable. That said, I want to know if this child was being abused.
Pretty sure I knew not to murder people at 10.
Pretty sure I knew not to murder people at 10.
Those aren't murder. This was. He beat an old woman to death. How can you forgive that?
I understand he did a terrible thing and his actions directly contributed to his grandmother's death, but how on earth do you then go on to justify charging a 10 year old as a adult?
Madness. I can't understand how anyone can think that's a good idea.
People here are actually OK with a 10-year-old being tried as an adult? You guys are more disturbing than the story itself...
He killed an innocent person. How is ANYTHING more disturbing than that?
He killed an innocent person. How is ANYTHING more disturbing than that?
You should probably read my posts above.
I get that you didn't understand your actions as a 10 year old, but that sure as hell doesn't excuse them.
I get that you didn't understand your actions as a 10 year old, but that sure as hell doesn't excuse them.
He killed an innocent person. How is ANYTHING more disturbing than that?
OP's Article said:[The attorney for the child] also can petition a judge to transfer the case to juvenile court.
Janine Edwards, Wayne County district attorney, said Pennsylvania law made it mandatory "that a criminal homicide charge be first directly filed in adult court by the prosecutor regardless of the age of the perpetrator," WBRE reported.
"It is not a choice I made," she told the station, adding that a juvenile detention center will not accept a child charged with homicide. "It's not a choice the warden made. It's not a choice Pennsylvania State Police made."
Why can you charge someone who isn't an adult as if they were an adult? It seems like we built an entire system around the idea that children are not able to be held to the same standard as adults, but we frequently make exceptions because we don't actually think that's true.
I honestly don't understand how the system works. It seems really weird to me.
Because you are supposedly the normal one.He killed an innocent person. How is ANYTHING more disturbing than that?
.[URL="https://localtvwnep.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141013224535480.pdf" said:Affidavit[/URL]]Your affiant is Trooper John D. DECKER of the Pa State Police Troop R Honesdale. I have been a trooper for the last 16 years, f am currently assisgned to the criminal investigations unit. I have had this assignment for the last eight years. Part of that assignement is to investigate and make arrests for crimes such as Criminal Homicide.
On 10/11/14 at approximately 1116 hrs myself and Wayne County Deputy Coroner, Carol LEINERT arrived at PSP Honesdale. We had just finished another call. Upon our arrival, PCO Dave AULISIO received a call from the Wayne County Communications Center advising that there was a deceased 94 year old woman at a personal care home on Skylake Rd. Tyler Hill, PA. LEINERT advised that she would go to the location and would advise PSP Honesdale should she need any assistance. LEINERT responded to the scene. The female, Helen NOVAK (90 years old), was located by LEINERT at the home (349 Skylake Rd. Tyler Hill, PA / Damascus Twp / Wayne County). NOVAK was subsequently transported to Wayne Memorial Hospital Morgue.
On 10/11/14 at approx. 1520hrs I was notified that there was a female in the lobby of PSP Honesdale that advised that she had information relative lo the death of NOVAK. I went to the lobby and identified myself. The female identified herself as Martha VIRBITSKY . Martha advised that her son, Tristen KURILLA (DOB 7/14/04 /10 years old) had told her that he had killed NOVAK. I then asked her what he said. Martha advised that her son had gone to his grandfather's house (Anthony ViRBITSKY) on the morning of 10/11/14. She advised that Anthony takes care of NOVAK because he used to run a personal care home there. Martha continued that her son had said that he had went into NOVAK's room and asked her a question and then she yelled at him to get out. Her son then advised that he got mad and lost his temper and grabbed a cane and put it around NOVAK's throat. He then pulled NOVAK down on the bed and held the cane on her throat. He then punched her repeatedly.
Martha advised that she has had a lot of trouble with Tristen and that he has had some mental difficulties. She advised that Tristen has been violent in the past and tells lies all the time. Martha then asked me to talk with Tristen. I informed her that Tristen could get into a lot of trouble for something like this and that he could face criminal charges. Martha advised that she understood and still wanted me to speak with him. Martha then advised that she did not want to be in the room and that she wanted me to talk with Tristen alone. I advised her that I typically do not do that when the individual is 10 years old. She advised that she understood that but felt that Tristen would be more honest if she was not there. I then advised Martha that she was allowed to have an attorney in with Tristen or to be in the room herself. She advised that she understood that and still wanted me to talk to Tristen without an attorney present or her in the room.
I then walked back out to the lobby with Martha and identified myself to Tristen. Martha then told Tristen that she wanted him to go into the barracks and speak with me. I then asked Tristen if he wanted his mother in the room with us and he advised that he did not. As we walked to the interview room I told Tristen that he did not have to talk with me and that he was welcomed to have his mother in the room with us if he wanted. Tristen advised that he wanted to speak with me and did not want his mother in the room. I then told him if at any time he wanted to leave the room and or have his mother in the room that I would go get her or take him back to the lobby. Tristen advised that he understood and would let me know if he changed his mind. I made sure that Tristen understood what the truth meant and he confirmed that he understood the concept. I then asked Tristen if he had ever lied before. Tristen responded, "Yes, a lot." I then asked him if he was going to lie to me, and he responded that he was not going to tell me any lies.
I then asked him to tell me what had happened. Tristen then said, "I killed that lady." I then said, "How did that happen?".
Tristen advised that he was at his grandfather's house. He advised that 10 am he went into NOVAK's room and she yelled at him to get out of her room. Tristen advised that this made him very mad and he lost his temper. He continued that he ran out of the room and grabbed a wooden cane and came back into the room. He advised that NOVAK was seated upright at the end of ner bed He advised that he came up behind her and put the cane around her throat and pulled back. Tristen advised that he pulled NOVAK down on the bed and pushed the cane into her throat for four to five seconds. He advised that he then look it off her and she sat up. He advised that when she sat up he punched her in the throat five limes and then in the stomach five limes. Tnsten advised that he was standing in front of NOVAK when he did this. I then said, Where you trying to kill her?". To which Tristen replied, "No, I was only trying to hurt her." I then asked Tristen where he got the cane from and what it looked like. I then asked Tnsten if he had told me the truth He advised that he had told me that whole truth. I then asked him to come to the lobby with me lo be with his mother.
I spoke with Anthony VIRBITSKY (grandfather of Tristen KURILLA). I asked Anthony to tell me what had happened. Anthony advised that Tristen had come to his house earlier in the morning so that he could watch him because his mother had to work. Anthony advised that at approx. 1030hrs Tristen came to him and told him that Helen (Novak) was bleeding from her mouth. Anthony advised that he went into her room to check on her. but found no blood. He advised that NOVAK was breathing heavy and looked scared.
Anthony advised that he asked NOVAK if she was OK and she said, "Yes". He advised that he then asked her if she wanted to go to the hospital, and she replied that she did not. Anthony advised that he asked Tristen what had happened to NOVAK and had he done anything to her and Tristen denied having done anything to her. Anthony then advised that he told Tristen to go into another room and he did not go back near NOVAK after that.
Anthony advised that at approx. 1100hrs he went back in to check on NOVAK and she was not responsive. Anthony advised that he did speak with Tristen further at which time Tristen advised him that he had punched the victim and put a cane around her neck. I then spoke with Martha VIRBITSKY atid advised her that I would like to get a statement from her son. She advised that Tristen does not write that well. I then advised Martha that I could audio record the statement. She advised that she would like to have the statement done that way. I then brought Martha VIRBITSKY and her son, Tristen KURILLA into the interview room. I immediately informed both Tristen and Martha that the conversation was being recorded. They both advised that they understood. I then asked Martha if she understood the rights I read. She replied, "Yes". I then asked Martha if having these rights in mind now she wanted the juvenile to talk with me now without an attorney present, she replied, Yes . I then. asked Tristen if he had opportunity to privately discuss this matter with his mother. Tristen appeared to be having trouble answering the questions so I asked him if he would like more time to discuss the matter with him mother and he advised that he did. I then advised him that I would stop recording and step out of the room so he could talk with his mother. I then stopped recording and stepped out of the room. Shortly thereafter Martha VIRBITSKY came out of the interview room and advised me that Tristen was ready to continue with the interview. I then went back into the room. Tristen subsequently provided very similar information to what he provided earlier. Except he now advised that after he had assaulted NOVAK she screamed that she could not eat when she was trying to eat a cracker that he had given to her earlier. Tristen also advised that NOVAK was having trouble breathing after he had assaulted her. Tristen insisted that he. was telling the truth about having assaulted NOVAK even after I told him repeatedly that he could get into trouble for what he was saying and that he could get arrested.
Your affiant subsequently obtained consent to search the residence of Anthony VIRBITSKY located at 349 Skylake Rd. Tyler Hill, PA. At that search a wooden cane (walking stick) was located in the room next to the victim's room. Tristen looked at the cane and identified that as being the cane that he had used to assault the victim.
On 10/13/14 at approx. 1230hrs an autopsy was performed by Dr. ROSS.. Also present at the autopsy were Al HUGHES , Wayne County Coroner. Edward HOWELL, Tpr. Gerald GUSTAS. and myself. Dr. ROSS reported that his findings for the autopsy were the following: The victim died from blunt force trauma to her neck. His ruling on the death was Homicide. Dr. ROSS also advised that th account provided by Tristen KURILLA was consistent with the injuries that he observed on the vicitm. He also advised that one of the blows to the victim's neck was definitely the cause of her death.
Fucked up. This whole thing about children not being adults - unless some prosecutor decides differently - is so much bullshit.
It's like ISIS levels of barbarism.
are people hoping he gets the death penalty or something?
Well, I suppose that's positive, though a bit weird.Just so everyone's on the same page:
So, the bit about the kid being tried as an adult may not be a permanent feature of this prosecution, assuming CNN is right about the law (which is, admittedly, a pretty big assumption).
Yeah, it is, actually.10 years old is no excuse. I knew the difference between life and death, and right and wrong when I was 10. Lock this little fucker up. He's obviously a danger to society.
10 is old enough to know you're seriously injuring and can possibly kill another person.
Try him as an adult, don't really see much of a future for him anyways.
Maitiú;134420690 said:This comment represents the problem of America for me. Angry, pessimistic quitters who have no patience to do anything more than punish, not realizing this very attitude is the cause of the country's darkness.
10 year olds barely even have a sense of self, let alone the true magnitude of ending a life or even believing they are capable of it in a scenario such as this one.