MidGenRefresh
*Refreshes biennially
For me it's San Francisco in Watch Dogs 2.
I don't really play Mafia III for the story or the scripted events. I just plug away at conquest and cruise.Mafia III had so much potential to be something really awesome, but it was repetitive unfortunately with no varied missions at all.
I enjoyed that the 6 star NPC's didn't auto kill you in 2 seconds in IV. Made rampages actually fun.Yes, the city map in GTA4 is cool. But you can't do much of anything in it, apart from doing linear missions or going on violent rampages on the extremely basic NPC AI, it's pretty much a dead backdrop with nothing in it.
Name a game where you can hop on a motorcycle and have fun in a skatepark (with actual working life like physics) and then bully some random passerby until it escalates into a full blown shoot out, escape a 4 star wanted level with skillful driving and then go play freaking darts . All this in the most atmospheric recreation of NY and blasting some seriously good music.Yes, the city map in GTA4 is cool. But you can't do much of anything in it, apart from doing linear missions or going on violent rampages on the extremely basic NPC AI, it's pretty much a dead backdrop with no substance.
People treating GTA like it's some amazing simulation are weird to me, did we even play the same game?!
You really want them to butcher it like they did the GTA Trilogy?GTA IV was amazing. If it doesn't get a remaster release in the next 4 years R* should be imprisoned.
A lazy remaster of gta IV would sell 10M over a few years. Keep it mechanically the same and keep the textures. Render it in 60fps and 4k with better draw distance. That's all it needs. I'm surprised they don't let people stream it through PS Premium.You really want them to butcher it like they did the GTA Trilogy?
If it can't be done cheaply and quickly they won't bother, so it's not worth it.
That being said, it's insane to think that GTA IV can't be played on a PS4 or PS5.
I found it awful as a game. Good graphics but everything else was terrible (yes, including the story and voice acting)Surprised (but not really) to see no mention of the Mafia 1 remake . One of the most underrated non discussed remakes of recent years. And one of the prettiest cities. Really good countryside middle of nowhere areas too.
For me it's San Francisco in Watch Dogs 2.
I found it awful as a game. Good graphics but everything else was terrible (yes, including the story and voice acting)
I think the world and setting are great. But outside the main missions I did not find much to enjoy.Complete opposite for me. And I played through the original on PC (and original Xbox) many times. Love the entire trilogy. Comfort food gaming.
I think the world and setting are great. But outside the main missions I did not find much to enjoy.
That's because canonically Cyberpunk is a continuation of Renegade.So you are the only individual riding a bike in the whole city despite having bikes everywhere.
I want to know the name of the genius dev who thought "im not gonna program my npc to do anything and pass it as social commentary"There is an unemployed man who lies to his family every day about going to work and just sits on a bench.
maybe he was tired after the first 199 residentsI want to know the name of the genius dev who thought "im not gonna program my npc to do anything and pass it as social commentary"
Necessity is the mother of invention !maybe he was tired after the first 199 residents
Remove the ubisoft filler in Mafia III and it's a pretty amazing game. It's really a shame because it's not even like the filler is optional, you HAVE to do a lot of it to progress through the story, and it's always the same thing, over and over, absolutely awful. It's too bad because the world, story and characters were great.Mafia III had so much potential to be something really awesome, but it was repetitive unfortunately with no varied missions at all.
I forgot this looks like a PS3 game. One of the biggest graphical downgrades in gaming history.Watch_Dogs’ Chicago is much better imo
I forgot this looks like a PS3 game. One of the biggest graphical downgrades in gaming history.
Interesting, forgot about that. Still looks terrible.Because it was a PS3 game?
Also, your mom is one of the biggest downgrades of all time.
Right….going inside a building in a mini town required a loading screen.No, because it never was.
I vastly prefer exploration and immersion from Skyrim with the all gorgeous atmospheric musics from Jeremy Soule.
Does GTA not have loading screens if you enter a building?Right….going inside a building in a mini town required a loading screen.
Skyrim and GTA are so philosophically far apart, in the approach to their world building, that comparisons almost fell like a waste of time. I'm not saying this is the case completely, but I doubt the conversing would lead to anything productive.Does GTA not have loading screens if you enter a building?
Elder Scrolls also has far more going on inside each building than GTA does. Items can be left all over the place and remain there forever to start with.
Yea was waiting to see this as an answer. I absolutely fucking love Night City and the amount of detail and accessible areas within it was staggering.City specific is Night City. It was the main character of Cyberpunk.
Where’s all the people? Just that one thi by anlone already makes it much less convincing than the GTA cities.Watch_Dogs’ Chicago is much better imo
It looks good from a distance but it's all so wooden and solid that interacting with the world is boring as hell, if you poke around you just get janky shit when in GTA 4 you'll see a cool random moment of physics working as they should. Even in the latest version you'll see pedestrians teleporting, walking over benches, running into the walls, they're not even at Rockstar's PS2 level.For me, Night City it is.
The map is so packed with details and when I'm walking around there I'm constantly discovering new alleys, new paths, new levels, new POI's, the city feels like a real big city to me.
For me, night City is the most immersive and believable open world at the moment.
After that would be the map and inhabitantsof GTAIV
The style that RDR2 was created in, feels like an iteration on the GTA IV formula. Specifically, in the way the game "feels" to play (if that makes any sense). Problem for us, that appreciate the feeling of weight in our actions, is GTA V (with it's more gamey feeling mechanics) was vastly more successful than both of the games previously mentioned.RDR2 is much better. You don't need huge cities to have the best open world game in any way.
But this comes from me. GTAIV was always overrated since day one for me. (i know...not a popular opinion)
For those of you playing GTA4 on PC, how is the PC port?
I haven’t played since ps3 and had kinda been thinking about it
I've read that GTA IV Vulkan API called DXVK makes the game much smoother with better framerate so it's to be enjoyed properly, but i haven't tried it myselfFor those of you playing GTA4 on PC, how is the PC port?
I haven’t played since ps3 and had kinda been thinking about it
I played it on Steam Deck and it was solid. I had to limit frames to 30 fps to pass the final qte for some reason.For those of you playing GTA4 on PC, how is the PC port?
I haven’t played since ps3 and had kinda been thinking about it