Amir0x said:Really? That keyboard is going to cost so much that it'll make up the gap of 300 dollars required for the PSP to go from 200 dollars to 500? Man, I didn't know those things would be so expensive!
The larger point is that not everyone's going to buy it, and if the thing is marketed as a gaming device, you can rest assured that people looking for a PDA will look elsewhere. Marketing defines everything, as Nintendo can surely attest to this generation.
Do you honestly think Sony won't have a stellar solution? At worst they'll just require a yearly fee much like a cellphone. This yearly fee will cover most of the big problems with this sort of thing and will allow people to connect much more easily via WiFi. Not to mention people all over the world have already connected online via PSP, so it's not near as difficult as you're making it out to seem.
Unless Sony's going to go ahead and install a global (or national) WiFi hotspot network to rival the coverage of current CDMA or GSM networks, there's no way in hell that the VoIP functionality will replace a cell phone. Ever. You want to talk about this thing being the next convergence device? You've gotta take the whole taco. If it needs to be fit into that definition, it needs to cover all the bases, and as cool, and as much potential as VoIP has, we're not even CLOSE to knocking down those plastic trees that house cellular antennas.
Again, price has ALWAYS been the hinderance of convergance technology. However, your observation fails when PS2, a form of convergance technology, has succeeded. Or when Xbox, another form of convergance technology, has succeeded.
How have the convergence aspects of either succeded in any distinguishable way? Yes, they CAN play DVDs, and people do use them to play DVDs, but the sales numbers pale in comparison to standalone units.
But even if you limit this to handheld products, which is perfectly acceptable, 200 dollar convergance hardware is extremely attractive, not to mention Sony is first and foremost marketing this as a gaming device.
i think your definition is way too broad, to be quite honest.
We'll see, of course, but I'll register my disagreement at the highest possible level.
So noted.