• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

2012 NBA Playoffs |OT| Tanks for the Memories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Damn it, 2 on ebanks.

Why did Sessions push so hard? Barnes in early. Daaaaaamn. Ebanks needed to get more than 2 minutes.

maybe he leaves him in?
 

Shadow780

Member
I can see Denver squeak one out before that Memphis collapse, I don't think so now. Lakers have the mental note not to repeat the same thing.
 

Babalu.

Member
Hky05.jpg

OBz2q.jpg

mJC3y.jpg
 
Lakers need to post up Pau a bit. And stop the transition.

Foul trouble not good for them. Denver pretty good FT shooting team i think.
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
Duncan's teams were better than Boston's on defense.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=7239

Also, 2004 Spurs were under 95ppg. 2008 Celtics were over 98pp100.

Those are both players's best, IIRC.

Well that about ends that...


i agree wholeheartedly, but i'd have to go with the 1st 3peat bulls.
i still remember their perimeter defense. it was insane and a wonder to watch.

I am sorry the 2nd 3peat Bulls were insane on both ends..

they held opponents to 93 ppg in a leauge that had 13 teams that averaged over 100 and the entire west outside of the griz averaged over 97 a game..

never nervous pervis celtics

...the list goes on...

The 93-94 Knicks team that lost to the Rockets..
 
I am sorry the 2nd 3peat Bulls were insane on both ends..

they held opponents to 93 ppg in a leauge that had 13 teams that averaged over 100 and the entire west outside of the griz averaged over 97 a game..
\.

no need to apologize.
i chose the 1st 3peat team solely because michael was a better defender then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom