i Would like to see some XBox One MGS V Screens
I'll do a few here in a bit.
i Would like to see some XBox One MGS V Screens
Call me crazy, but I think your Driveclub screen looks better as a jpeg. The JPEG hides/fixes a lot of the aliasing/shimmering.*Comparisons*
Still one of the best looking games available (on any platform) and this was a launch window title. Great work by Sucker Punch, can't wait to see what else they have in store.
Call me crazy, but I think your Driveclub screen looks better as a jpeg. The JPEG hides/fixes a lot of the aliasing/shimmering.
PNG:
![]()
JPEG:
![]()
[Call-Me-G];177327758 said:In fact, a lot of the best looking games available were released during the launch window: Ryse, Killzone and inFamous. Since 14/02, we only had The Order, Batman, and maybe one or two games I've forgotten the name...
Witcher 3 is the only other looker I can think of. Everything else has been average in comparison.[Call-Me-G];177327758 said:In fact, a lot of the best looking games available were released during the launch window: Ryse, Killzone and inFamous. Since 14/02, we only had The Order, Batman, and maybe one or two games I've forgotten the name...
PNG is a lossless compression format meaning it should represent the game much more accurately than even the highest quality jpeg. It's even possible to make animated PNGs (like gifs) but it's pretty uncommon.Is it a cloud or the PNG has ore contrast and colours than JPEG?
I don't see how when the JPG has more compression/bit blurrier.Call me crazy, but I think your Driveclub screen looks better as a jpeg. The JPEG hides/fixes a lot of the aliasing/shimmering.
PNG:
![]()
JPEG:
![]()
Yep, I noticed that as PNG looks much more clear.The Infamous PNG/JPEG comparison shows JPEG is blurrier than PNG. Can see it looking at the left tree leaves
The Infamous PNG/JPEG comparison shows JPEG is blurrier than PNG. Can see it looking at the left tree leaves
OMG it's so nice to see these without the shitty artefacts. Darker screenshots usually look like ass because of it but now they look so clean.
OMG it's so nice to see these without the shitty artefacts. Darker screenshots usually look like ass because of it but now they look so clean.
When is the 3.0 coming out for real? Can I join the beta somehow? I WANT IT
Cool, thanks.
I used inFAMOUS FL for this because photo mode let you get a perfectly matched still-frame.
This is where you realise (if you didn't already know) most capture cards can't capture perfect lossless 4:4:4 frames.<< animated PNG, not supported on all browsers![]()
![]()
![]()
Some mine screenshots comparison :
Hehe saves you couple hundred bucks. Still it must be said that capture cards like that one are in a whole different league. You get all the benefits of having a perfect lossless capture together with frame by frame control instead of guessing and hoping you had the right timing.I used inFAMOUS FL for this because photo mode let you get a perfectly matched still-frame.
This is where you realise (if you didn't already know) most capture cards can't capture perfect lossless 4:4:4 frames.
So happy I'm no longer tempted to get an Intensity Pro 4K. Cheaper cards/boxes are fine if you're mostly uploading lossy video.
Three screens per postSome mine screenshots comparison :
Very nice shot, love the colour against the darkness of the night.
Three screens per post![]()
![]()
![]()
Can you see these?
Nope.
Err, I can see them.Damn. Guess I'll find a new host.
Don't they appear even after pressing CTRL+F5?Hmm, must be me then. I've noticed that same broken image symbol a few times on GAF over the past few days. You guys have any idea how I can fix it? I'm using Chrome.