Devolution
Member
Surprised Distribution of Child Porn isn't up there. There are forums and sites where people "trade" or contact those so that they can trade their "stash."
no they're just annoying. they're not actually militant.
Correct. Militant means using or inciting the use of violence to further your cause.
And how does any of this hurt anyone?
If it doesn't anyone, why didn't The Oatmeal describe them in like fashion? Why describe them as polite people who keep to themselves?
i've seen more than a few drunk driving defense force members here on gaf.
Same. It's always "oh you've done it too don't lie" line of shit from them too.
"I have a right to enjoy a beer with my meal!"
Just an excerpt taken from men going there own way forums
![]()
I can't say that most of that I don't agree with logically
it's eloquent as hell though
![]()
It's a dumb fucking thing to do and all, but probably half of the people I know are total scum and need their license revoked going by some GAF reactions.i've seen more than a few drunk driving defense force members here on gaf.
It's a dumb fucking thing to do and all, but probably half of the people I know are total scum and need their license revoked going by some GAF reactions.
militant atheists
my personal favourite:"I drive perfectly fine, even better, while intoxicated."
My suggestion would be to find better friends then.It's a dumb fucking thing to do and all, but probably half of the people I know are total scum and need their license revoked going by some GAF reactions.
Understood, but I don't think most people are trying to defend it. To speak for myself, I don't condone it at all. I don't even drink. But i'm just being realistic about even good people taking huge risks and making stupid mistakes without realizing it sometimes.In the defense of those people when you know friends or family members who have been killed by drunk drivers to hear some people boast about it or defend it is frankly insulting.
That's not a real thing. Outspoken is not the same thing as militant.
Understood, but I don't think most people are trying to defend it. To speak for myself, I don't condone it at all. I don't even drink. But i'm just being realistic about even good people taking huge risks and making stupid mistakes without realizing it sometimes.
"I have a right to enjoy a beer with my meal!"
The "Drunk Drivers Should Have Their License Revoked FOREVER THEY ARE UTTER HUMAN GARBAGE" crowd often just strikes me as basement dwellers or teetotalers who have never gone out and had fun, and are just looking for a way to harshly judge those that do.
Go to a bar. Look around. Almost all of these people are going to drive home after a couple drinks. Probably all of them will be utterly fine, causing no injury to themselves or others. I just hate the attitude that drunk driving is some activity only for the utterly irresponsible scumbags of the world, when practically everyone does it sooner or later. If you haven't done it, then chances are your mom or dad or friends have. Nobody wants to call a cab because they had a couple margaritas at the mexican place after work.
And how does any of this hurt anyone?
The "Drunk Drivers Should Have Their License Revoked FOREVER THEY ARE UTTER HUMAN GARBAGE" crowd often just strikes me as basement dwellers or teetotalers who have never gone out and had fun, and are just looking for a way to harshly judge those that do.
Go to a bar. Look around. Almost all of these people are going to drive home after a couple drinks. Probably all of them will be utterly fine, causing no injury to themselves or others. I just hate the attitude that drunk driving is some activity only for the utterly irresponsible scumbags of the world, when practically everyone does it sooner or later. If you haven't done it, then chances are your mom or dad or friends have. Nobody wants to call a cab because they had a couple margaritas at the mexican place after work.
Nobody wants to call a cab because they had a couple margaritas at the mexican place after work.
awww this topic is gonna turn into a drunk driving debate isn't it?
I was hoping for more info about gang stalking. Has anyone here ever been a victim?
depending where you live it wouldn't, its something you say to appear reasonable in order to then justify having multiple beers with your meal.Not at all a drunk driving apologist, but since when does having a beer over the course a meal actually lead to significant BAC when the time comes to leave?
The "Drunk Drivers Should Have Their License Revoked FOREVER THEY ARE UTTER HUMAN GARBAGE" crowd often just strikes me as basement dwellers or teetotalers who have never gone out and had fun, and are just looking for a way to harshly judge those that do.
Go to a bar. Look around. Almost all of these people are going to drive home after a couple drinks. Probably all of them will be utterly fine, causing no injury to themselves or others. I just hate the attitude that drunk driving is some activity only for the utterly irresponsible scumbags of the world, when practically everyone does it sooner or later. If you haven't done it, then chances are your mom or dad or friends have. Nobody wants to call a cab because they had a couple margaritas at the mexican place after work.
Texting or talking while driving has been show to be as dangerous or more dangerous than drinking.....yet you see none of the same indignation there, and people have pretty violently fought legislation to prevent it.
I'm still foggy on the exact nature of 'gang stalking'. Are these people legitimately ill? Are they paranoid that everyone's out for them?
You can have fun without drunk driving. It's called a DD, staying over at someone's house or a cab.
True, they'd rather call their therapist in 6 months after having a mental breakdown to learn how to cope with murdering innocent people.
What about a funeral?I can think of nothing more tortuous than sitting around in a bar sober.....except maybe having to drive all over town having to drop off the drunks who were actually having fun.
What about a funeral?
What about a funeral?
As far as I understand it, they think that an "organization", often the government, pays a large number of actors/spies to just hang around a victim and do more or less annoying things, in order to let the victim slowly be aware that they're there. This will cause the victim to be inconvenienced and perhaps irritated, which might escalate into the victim becoming angry and doing something criminal. And then the victim will be arrested. Or, the reason behind the stalking might be the opposite: to make the victim live in fear, so that they won't dare to do anything. In other words, control the victim.
Or a jail cell.
Sadly I think this is scarier to most people than the funeral.