• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

5G scare...is this legit???

lukilladog

Member
Interesting document on FCC website


gMYOg8R.jpg

electricsense...

"
Why Did I Create This Website?
I felt compelled to speak out. One day out of the blue my cell phone rang, I pulled it out of my jacket pocket to answer the call and………BAM………that was how it all started. Within seconds of answering the call my ear started to feel warm from the outside in, this burning sensation then spread to the whole side of my face. I was soon feeling dizzy and confused.

And it didn’t just happen once. From that point on it happened every single time I answered my phone.

It soon got that it was too painful for me to use my cell phone. Then it was my office computer, my TV, the radio in my car , I was even reacting to my landline telephone at one point. I got very sick. If you’d like to hear my full story, including how I’ve experienced complete freedom, click here to discover more…

I now know how dangerous cell phone radiation and electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are. I’ve experienced it first hand.

:messenger_tears_of_joy:



"
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores



Web addresses of files taking advantage of the commenting system begin "ecfsapi.fcc.gov."
 

LordPezix

Member
Also this:


radiation.png



(5G isn't even on this chart because it doesn't rise up to the level of ionizing radiation)

This is the greatest scientific proof post I've ever seen.

Says right in the picture "If you're basing radiation safety procedures on an internet PNG image and things go wrong, you have no one to blame but yourself"

Also at the bottom of the source link. I waive all copyright to this chart and place it in the public domain, so you are free to reuse it anywhere with no permission necessary. (However, keep in mind that I am not a radiation expert, and this chart is intended for general public informational use only.)

I love the internet, thank you.
 

lukilladog

Member
This is the greatest scientific proof post I've ever seen.

Says right in the picture "If you're basing radiation safety procedures on an internet PNG image and things go wrong, you have no one to blame but yourself"

Also at the bottom of the source link. I waive all copyright to this chart and place it in the public domain, so you are free to reuse it anywhere with no permission necessary. (However, keep in mind that I am not a radiation expert, and this chart is intended for general public informational use only.)

I love the internet, thank you.

Is it wrong though?.
 

YCoCg

Member
I've studied and worked with many people over the years in electrical engineering, general electronics, communication technologies, broadcast technology, etc and sadly I'm afraid to say, if you're scared of 5G then you're a complete idiot.

PS: Please stop attacking workers setting up GENERAL towers and installing Fibre lines, you fucking numbskulls.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
This is the greatest scientific proof post I've ever seen.

Says right in the picture "If you're basing radiation safety procedures on an internet PNG image and things go wrong, you have no one to blame but yourself"

Also at the bottom of the source link. I waive all copyright to this chart and place it in the public domain, so you are free to reuse it anywhere with no permission necessary. (However, keep in mind that I am not a radiation expert, and this chart is intended for general public informational use only.)

I love the internet, thank you.
I'm unclear on what your point is.
 

MadAnon

Member
I do understand from a security and technology perspective 5g seems pointless. I'd rather have infrastructure to get fiber in more places. Use Airfiber where it can be used and finally use edge routers and wifi.

I don't understand millimeter wave technology but I do know the military has this:


"The ADS works by firing a high-powered (100 kW output power)[13] beam of 95 GHz waves at a target, which corresponds to a wavelength of 3.2 mm.[14] The ADS millimeter wave energy works on a similar principle as a microwave oven, exciting the water and fat molecules in the skin, and instantly heating them via dielectric heating. One significant difference is that a microwave oven uses the much lower frequency (and longer wavelength) of 2.45 GHz. The short millimeter waves used in ADS only penetrate the top layers of skin, with most of the energy being absorbed within 0.4 mm (1⁄64 inch),[15] whereas microwaves will penetrate into human tissue about 17 mm (0.67 inch).[16]"


"High-band 5G uses frequencies of 25 - 39 GHz, near the bottom of the millimeter wave band, to achieve download speeds of 1 - 3 gigabits per second (Gbit/s), comparable to cable internet. However millimeter waves (mmWave or mmW) only have a range of about 1 mile (1.6 km), requiring many small cells, and have trouble passing through some types of building walls."

5G from what I found is running up to 90GHz.
The key here is 100kW output power. Most powerful 5g transmitters have like what, 120w output power? Do the math.
 
Last edited:

darkinstinct

...lacks reading comprehension.
The key here is 100kW output power. Most powerful 5g transmitters have like what, 120w output power? Do the math.
5G signal is less than 200 meters before it's useless (and that is with nothing in the way, even a single tree can block the signal). Your Bluetooth will kill you much faster with a signal range of 500+ meters (Bluetooth 5) through everything. Your Wifi signal will kill you long before 5G.
 
F

Foamy

Unconfirmed Member
I too was worried about the potential dangers of 5G but after reading numerous articles I do feel comfortable with the technology. To answer why we need such high speeds, well mostly for autonomous vehicles, drones, A.I. and everything and anything electronic being linked.

top_10_5g_use_cases_video_cv_960.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MadAnon

Member
5G signal is less than 200 meters before it's useless (and that is with nothing in the way, even a single tree can block the signal). Your Bluetooth will kill you much faster with a signal range of 500+ meters (Bluetooth 5) through everything. Your Wifi signal will kill you long before 5G.
And this relates to my post how exactly?

The person I replied was trying to point out a connection between the frequency used in a weapons system and the 5G frequency. I simply explained that this weapons system has like x830 higher power output than the strongest 5G transmitter.
 
Last edited:

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
The person I replied was trying to point out a connection between the frequency used in a weapons system and the 5G frequency. I simply explained that this weapons system has like x830 higher power output than the strongest 5G transmitter.
The range of ADS is 1,000 meters. Have you experienced the effects of an ADS within 1,000 meters of a 5G transmitter before?
 

MadAnon

Member
The range of ADS is 1,000 meters. Have you experienced the effects of an ADS within 1,000 meters of a 5G transmitter before?
qU1I6dJQQxtaWFEC3teSVeVcsVMgNRG8hwqTvvGgaEPP42NV36vKEKaj8pX4lIbY2igOthIMPrQ4GJ5pJ38

I'm literally telling that 5G has extremely tiny power output in comparison to this ADS. Basically it doesn't have anywhere near the power density to heat anything unlike ADS.
 
Last edited:

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
qU1I6dJQQxtaWFEC3teSVeVcsVMgNRG8hwqTvvGgaEPP42NV36vKEKaj8pX4lIbY2igOthIMPrQ4GJ5pJ38

I'm literally telling that 5G has extremely tiny power output in comparison to this ADS. Basically it doesn't have anywhere near the power density to heat anything unlike ADS.
Ah, right. I guess I read something wrong because it sounded like you were arguing the opposite in my head. When I go back further up the reply chain it makes sense.
 

V4skunk

Banned
So , let me get this straight, does anyone in this thread actually knows how mobile networks work and what actually is 5G?
Because i only read people talking about the frequencies when in reality that it's not even the best part of the technology and could easily be readjusted if found dangerous.

Edit: also, to anyone worried, if you don't live next to a cell tower, your biggest worry should be where you keep your router and your cellphone instead of the frecuency of the towers. Don't hold your phone next to your head after dialing if you fear radio signals and turn off the wifi of your router.
I do.
5g uses dielectric lens which is the main technology that makes military grade weapons like phased array radars and active denial systems work.

Here is a hardware breakdown that shows the tech and exactly what voltage the system runs at etc...
Edited because wrong link.
 
Last edited:

Keihart

Member
I do.
5g uses dielectric lens which is the main technology that makes military grade weapons like phased array radars and active denial systems work.

Here is a hardware breakdown that shows the tech and exactly what voltage the system runs at etc...
Edited because wrong link.

Ok then, then please explain why do you think that the frecuency it's so important for the standard? i have read all the documentation from 3gpp about the progress of the standard recently, and frecuency it's hardly a focus of the standard push. In fact it is intended to use 4G frecuencies in some countries in phase 1.

Edit: I'm asking because i only read here comments about the radio component of 5G, when that it's hardly where the innovation is at.
 
Last edited:

#Phonepunk#

Banned
is there a map of 5G towers? like how many are in each state, or the geographical locations? feel like you could compare concentration of towers to Covid-19 infections, if that truly was a link.

have been done this? tho i suppose it would be tough, since there is a lot of desire to underreport and misrepresent facts for politicians all over the world, real numbers would be hard to get. but i think a general comparison survey wouldn't be hard to do.
 
Last edited:

YCoCg

Member
is there a map of 5G towers? like how many are in each state, or the geographical locations? feel like you could compare concentration of towers to Covid-19 infections, if that truly was a link.

have been done this? tho i suppose it would be tough, since there is a lot of desire to underreport and misrepresent facts for politicians all over the world, real numbers would be hard to get. but i think a general comparison survey wouldn't be hard to do.
You seriously think that would convince the nut jobs? Over here they've been torching normal phone/4g towers because they "thought" it was 5g and "could feel the radiation".
 

V4skunk

Banned
Ok then, then please explain why do you think that the frecuency it's so important for the standard? i have read all the documentation from 3gpp about the progress of the standard recently, and frecuency it's hardly a focus of the standard push. In fact it is intended to use 4G frecuencies in some countries in phase 1.

Edit: I'm asking because i only read here comments about the radio component of 5G, when that it's hardly where the innovation is at.
You need to know the difference between a dielectric lens and a normal antenna.
I'm no expert but phased array radars work at 60-300ghz and are millimetre wave length like 5g.
5g tech (dielectric lens) is what makes modern radars (phased array) be able to track objects and 3d map battlefields, including 3d mapping of buildings.
It is common knowledge that the telecom companies want 5g to control autonomous vehicles....
The problem is pointing this shit at people is dangerous and zero research has been done on none ionising radiation above 30ghz.
 

MadAnon

Member
I do.
5g uses dielectric lens which is the main technology that makes military grade weapons like phased array radars and active denial systems work.

Here is a hardware breakdown that shows the tech and exactly what voltage the system runs at etc...
Edited because wrong link.

When you get your info from buffoons like the guy in this video...

I stopped watching when he didn't even understood what those "Optical radiation risk groups" mean. I literally choked on my laugh when he said these LEDs are extremely toxic because of those risk group warnings.

Risk group 2 for optical radiation basically means that it might be harmful to eyes if you look at the light source for a prolonged period of time. You obviously stare at the Sun without any protection, right? Or if you are stupid enough, just stare at the light bulb in your room for an hour and tell me how it went for your eyes.

At least he saved me time by demonstrating his idocy during the first 2 minutes.
 
Last edited:

Keihart

Member
You need to know the difference between a dielectric lens and a normal antenna.
I'm no expert but phased array radars work at 60-300ghz and are millimetre wave length like 5g.
5g tech (dielectric lens) is what makes modern radars (phased array) be able to track objects and 3d map battlefields, including 3d mapping of buildings.
It is common knowledge that the telecom companies want 5g to control autonomous vehicles....
The problem is pointing this shit at people is dangerous and zero research has been done on none ionising radiation above 30ghz.
WTF, aren't dielectric lens what you call the fucking bucket in front of MMOO links? Those are used to focus the signal it has nothing to do with what frecuency you want to irradiate at i think.
BTW, the control of autonomous vehicles will be made possible by lowering the latency , which has nothing to do with the radio component but the control plane and the backhaul.

I can give the benefit of the doubt to some band having harmful long term effect not yet studied, but i have no idea what are you talking about here as proof and relating it somehow with low latency applications?
 
Last edited:

MetalAlien

Banned
Ok but, do you sit under the sun 24/7?
No but but you are exposed to the sun through out your life. You can't avoid it. Exsposer is dosage vs time. The sun is exposing you to massively higher doses and for much longer than anything 5 g will ever do.

Ultraviolet light coming from the sun for example is in the petahertz range.
 
Last edited:

#Phonepunk#

Banned
You seriously think that would convince the nut jobs? Over here they've been torching normal phone/4g towers because they "thought" it was 5g and "could feel the radiation".
fyi the US government has a long history of using dangerous materials that are harmful to the public and covering them up. you know about the Flint water issue? this is just one result of malfescance that directly harms the public. then there are instances like the Rocky Flats nuclear accident that sent a cloud of radioactive gas towards the city of Denver, Colorado.

800px-Worker_holding_a_plutonium_button.jpg

On September 11, 1957, a plutonium fire occurred in one of the gloveboxes used to handle radioactive materials, igniting the combustible rubber gloves and plexiglas windows of the box. Metallic plutonium is a fire hazard and pyrophoric; under the right conditions it may ignite in air at room temperature. The accident resulted in the contamination of Building 771, the release of plutonium into the atmosphere, and caused $818,600 in damage. An incinerator for plutonium-contaminated waste was installed in Building 771 in 1958.

Barrels of radioactive waste were found to be leaking into an open field in 1959. This was not made publicly known until 1970 when wind-borne particles were detected in Denver.

Throughout the 1960s, the plant continued to enlarge and add buildings. The 1960s also brought more contamination to the site. In 1967, 3,500 barrels (560 m3) of plutonium-contaminated lubricants and solvents were stored on Pad 903. A large number of them were found to be leaking, and low-level contaminated soil was becoming wind-borne from this area. This pad was covered with gravel and paved over with asphalt in 1969.

May 11, 1969 saw a major fire in a glovebox in Building 776/777.[18] This was the costliest industrial accident ever to occur in the United States up to that time. Cleanup from the accident took two years and led to safety upgrades on the site, including fire sprinkler systems and firewalls.

this was in fact the real life inspiration behind the villains of the Simpsons. the public would remain unaware of the incident until someone tested radiation in the soil a decade later. eventually the EPA stepped in and there was in fact a dramatic FBI raid at the plant dubbed Operation Desert Glow in the 1980s.
In 1987, plant insiders started to covertly inform the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about the unsafe conditions. In December 1988, the FBI commenced clandestine flights of light aircraft over the area and confirmed via infrared video recordings that the "outdated and unpermitted" Building 771 incinerator was apparently being used late into the night.[29] After several months of collecting evidence both from workers and via direct measurement, the FBI informed the DOE on June 6, 1989 that they wanted to meet to discuss a potential terrorist threat.

On June 6, 1989, the United States District Court for the District Court of Colorado issued a search warrant to the FBI, based in part on information collected by Colorado Department of Health (now CDPHE) inspectors during the 1980s.

Dubbed "Operation Desert Glow", the raid, sponsored by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), began at 9 a.m. on June 6, 1989. After arriving in the meeting room, the FBI agents revealed the true reason for the meeting to stunned DOE and Rockwell officials, including Dominic Sanchini, Rockwell International's manager of Rocky Flats. (Coincidentally, Sanchini died the next year in Boulder of cancer.). The FBI discovered numerous violations of federal anti-pollution laws, including limited contamination of water and soil. In 1992, Rockwell International was charged with environmental crimes including violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Clean Water Act. Rockwell pleaded guilty and paid an $18.5 million fine. This was the largest fine for an environmental crime to that date.
eventually the Cold War ended and the need to produce plutonium buttons, products that are used only to make nuclear bombs, declined. the plant was eventually shut down in W's first term, as congress passed a "National Wildlife Refuge Act" which dictated the top 3 feet of soil be measure to a certain level of radiation. they ended up dumping trucks of dirt on top of the site to satisfy that pitiful requirement.
In 2001, Congress passed the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge Act. In July 2007, the U.S. Department of Energy transferred nearly 4,000 acres (6 sq mi; 16 km2) of land on the Rocky Flats site to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to establish the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge. Surveys of the site reveal 630 species of vascular plants, 76% of which are native. Herds of elk are commonly seen on the site. However, the DOE retained the central area of the site, the Central Operable Unit.

The last contaminated building was removed and the last weapons-grade plutonium was shipped out in 2003, ending the cleanup based on a modified cleanup agreement. The modified agreement required a higher level of cleanup in the first 3 feet (0.9 m) of soil in exchange for not having to remove any contamination below that point unless it posed a chance of migrating to the surface or contaminating the groundwater. About half of the 800 buildings previously existing on the site had been dismantled by early December 2004. By 2006, over 800 buildings had been decommissioned and demolished, with no buildings remaining. Today, the plant and all buildings are gone.
so this place was a hazard for 50 years, which included 10+ following the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War. it is not beyond imagination that the US government would ever cover up something damaging to the public yet very profitable.
 
Last edited:

YCoCg

Member
fyi the US government has a long history of using dangerous materials that are harmful to the public and covering them up.
And what's that got to do with idiots in the UK destroying things that arn't even the things they claim them to be? And then making up lies about said things to justify their dumb borderline special actions.
 

Jayjayhd34

Gold Member
The one hole in this conspiracy is how fuck do the people implementing 5g are protecting themselves.

I get kicked out of all 5g groups without hesitation for stating this with no answer....
 

V4skunk

Banned
When you get your info from buffoons like the guy in this video...

I stopped watching when he didn't even understood what those "Optical radiation risk groups" mean. I literally choked on my laugh when he said these LEDs are extremely toxic because of those risk group warnings.

Risk group 2 for optical radiation basically means that it might be harmful to eyes if you look at the light source for a prolonged period of time. You obviously stare at the Sun without any protection, right? Or if you are stupid enough, just stare at the light bulb in your room for an hour and tell me how it went for your eyes.

At least he saved me time by demonstrating his idocy during the first 2 minutes.
You'll find that he is a ex British Army electronic warfare specialist that is fighting a huge legal battle with the British government and his local council, and just recently was taken to court for a gagging order by his local council of which the judge refused.
Also you are correct about the class 2 optical radiation and the point that was made is that blue led light radiation with out a shroud is class 3 and damaging to your eyes.
You need to try harder.
WTF, aren't dielectric lens what you call the fucking bucket in front of MMOO links? Those are used to focus the signal it has nothing to do with what frecuency you want to irradiate at i think.
BTW, the control of autonomous vehicles will be made possible by lowering the latency , which has nothing to do with the radio component but the control plane and the backhaul.

I can give the benefit of the doubt to some band having harmful long term effect not yet studied, but i have no idea what are you talking about here as proof and relating it somehow with low latency applications?
Yes wtf!
Dielectric lens focuses a beam at you like a laser! Many hundreds are used together in a phased array radar!
It's how the radars are able to detect and track multiple targets at the same time, then because the radar is millimetre wave it can penetrate through things like buildings and people.
 
Last edited:

Jayjayhd34

Gold Member
not live where the towers are deployed.


Thats like playing the lottery as these mast are not all made by the same people so they would nessarily know where one is.


Secondly 5g is going liturally be everywhere since they has such a short radius. Its going to be next impossible for anyone to avoid 5g when it's finished rolling out.


These conspiracies since introduction of radio waves, this will die down everyone will use 5g and then 6g will come out everyone will be making conspiraces about 6g on there 5g phones.....
 

Keihart

Member
You'll find that he is a ex British Army electronic warfare specialist that is fighting a huge legal battle with the British government and his local council, and just recently was taken to court for a gagging order by his local council of which the judge refused.
Also you are correct about the class 2 optical radiation and the point that was made is that blue led light radiation with out a shroud is class 3 and damaging to your eyes.
You need to try harder.

Yes wtf!
Dielectric lens focuses a beam at you like a laser! Many hundreds are used together in a phased array radar!
It's how the radars are able to detect and track multiple targets at the same time, then because the radar is millimetre wave it can penetrate through things like buildings and people.
do you realize that there are thousand of this distributed over cities and even more so in non urban areas to link together equipment? It's not exactly new
 

V4skunk

Banned
I'm more aware than you are thank you.
You are literally here trying to argue that none ionising radiation is not bad for you.
Plenty of evidence all over the Web of people using emf meters and showing straight up illegal levels of em radiation in places where there is 5g.
 

Avasarala

Emoji Emperor
4g antennas run at 20W with an effective range of 2-12 miles, topology dependent.
5g antennas run at .2 - 10W, with an effective range from tens to hundreds of meters.

Frequency != Power.

5g runs at a fraction of total output power of 4g, that's why there are more antennas per square mile.
 

MadAnon

Member
You'll find that he is a ex British Army electronic warfare specialist that is fighting a huge legal battle with the British government and his local council, and just recently was taken to court for a gagging order by his local council of which the judge refused.
Also you are correct about the class 2 optical radiation and the point that was made is that blue led light radiation with out a shroud is class 3 and damaging to your eyes.
You need to try harder.
You do know that the Sun is by far the biggest blue light source? It's basically a group 2. Better not go out then.

And no, it is not group 3 without a shroud. That's another thing he made up. Group 3 are light sources that can cause immidate damage just by momentarily gazing. And as far as I know besides lasers there are no such light sources. Group 2 basically means that as long as you let your body naturally react to staring at such bright light by closing eyes or turning your head away, you will be fine.

Electronic warfare specialist my ass! Probably made up that title to sound smarter amongst his conspiracy friends.
 
Last edited:

V4skunk

Banned
You do know that the Sun is by far the biggest blue light source? It's basically a group 2. Better not go out then.

And no, it is not group 3 without a shroud. That's another thing he made up. Group 3 are light sources that can cause immidate damage just by momentarily gazing. And as far as I know besides lasers there are no such light sources. Group 2 basically means that as long as you let your body naturally react to staring at such bright light by closing eyes or turning your head away, you will be fine.

Electronic warfare specialist my ass! Probably made up that title to sound smarter amongst his conspiracy friends.
You know absolutely zero. The sun also blinds you and gives you cancer.
A 5 second censored google search also brings up these facts.
 
Last edited:

Faenrir

Member
It seems to be a thing on schools. They are doing test in my country with it atm to see if there is a reason to be worried about it.

I think they call it EHS electrohypersensitivity.

Lot's of schools started to report of kids feeling sick on school or headics while at home have no issue's. Wifi was in there idea the reason for it or atleast it seemed to remedy it when wifi wasn't on.
Are you sure they really have headeaches, though, and are not pretending to be sick to avoid school ? Lots of kids play sick to avoid school xD

What the fuck are people doing with their phones that require 10 times faster than 4G?
Using a phone as hotspot to dl 100+Gb games is something that would be vastly improved ;)
 
Last edited:

MadAnon

Member
You know absolutely zero. The sun also blinds you and gives you cancer.
A 5 second censored google search also brings up these facts.
This is worthy to be moved to Clown World thread.

Imagine thinking that I don't know that excessive blue light over years can degrade vision. :pie_roffles: That's why you don't stare at light sources or spend overly long hours staring at screens (especially in dark). What the fuck are you trying to argue here? That LEDs are dangerous if you stare at them like a moron? No shit, Sherlock! That idiot in the video thinks that government is out there to get him with their toxic LED lamps on streets. What kind of lamps do you propose to put on streets? The invisible ones? :pie_roffles:Afterall the visible light consists of "toxic" blue light.

I guess you and that moron in the video are both living in a cave to hide from all the toxic blue light coming from the Sun, LED lamps, screens etc.
 
Last edited:

V4skunk

Banned
Imagine thinking that I don't know that excessive blue light over years can degrade vision. :pie_roffles: That's why you don't stare at light sources or spend overly long hours staring at screens (especially in dark). What the fuck are you trying to argue here? That LEDs are dangerous if you stare at them like a moron? No shit, Sherlock!

I guess you and that moron in the video are both living in a cave to hide from all the toxic blue light coming from the Sun, LED lamps, screens etc.
Try harder.
 

Hulk_Smash

Banned
There is this series on netflix. About this girl that has that. Except she doesn't. She got cured after she took all the husbands money and when he was broke she just got better and divorced him. Maybe it is all just bullshit. Isn't that what Saul's crazy brother thought he had?

I do actually know a person who had that and it was not a scam. Imagine living in Florida with the only AC you have is whatever blows from your neighbor’s connected condo. The only silver lining is that she didn’t have any children so not a lot of reason to venture out and visit family or other activities.
 
Top Bottom