I am not one to fall for conspiracy theories, but I recently saw the movie called 9/11:In Plane Site. The movie definetly raises some interesting questions that need answering, but no one even thinks to ask.
-The Pentagon is the most gaurded building in the country. You would think that there would be at least one peice of video footage of the plane hitting.
-There was no evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon. No wheels, airplane parts....nothing. Not even a crater.
-Experts say that if a plane actually hit the Pentagon loaded with ultra-hot fuel, the building would have been reduced the thickness of a pancake. If the same kind of plane can bring down a huge skyscraper, then why was there only a hole on the rim of the pentagon?
-The hole in the pentagon would need to be 2-3 times bigger than it is to prove that a commercial airliner hit it. The video clearly shows that with the wingspan of the plane that it would have made a much bigger hole.
-The only footage of the explosion at the petnagon is shown in the movie, and it shows no plane. One second you see the pentagon, the next second you see an explosion. Could be fake, I dont know. But seriously there would have HAD to be some footage.
-Closeups of the aftermath of the building show that, when you zoom in, you can see desks and other office equipment intact. They even show papers on the desks. Nothing looks burned. Could also be fake, but who knows.
-During a live newscast on a cable news channel (forgot which one), the anchorman says "Thats definetly not a commercial airliner, it looks like a cargo plane of some kind". Which raises the question--could all the victims who supposedly died on airplanes--never existed? I tell you one thing, I never believed that woman and her "let's roll!" story for one minute anyway. And isnt that the only account of a family member of someone who was on one of the planes? And come to think of it, has there ever been any testimony from any families of victims that were on board one of the planes that hit the Pentagon?
-Firefighters interviewed on 9/11 who escaped the building say that you could clearly hear explosives going off consequtively from floor to floor.
I dont believe everything in the movie, but I think someone's not telling the total truth about 9/11. You would think that in the biggest terrorist attack on American soil, someone would take credit for it immediatly. I mean, whats the point of your "Jihad" when you dont take credit for your attacks and get your point across?
I recommend this movie to anyone, regardless of what your stance is on Bush, the war on Terror or anything else. The questions in the movie deserved to be answered considering all the lives that were taken on 9/11. But sadly, these questions will go unanswered, especially considering that our current president lacks the ability to answer a question witha straight answer.
-The Pentagon is the most gaurded building in the country. You would think that there would be at least one peice of video footage of the plane hitting.
-There was no evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon. No wheels, airplane parts....nothing. Not even a crater.
-Experts say that if a plane actually hit the Pentagon loaded with ultra-hot fuel, the building would have been reduced the thickness of a pancake. If the same kind of plane can bring down a huge skyscraper, then why was there only a hole on the rim of the pentagon?
-The hole in the pentagon would need to be 2-3 times bigger than it is to prove that a commercial airliner hit it. The video clearly shows that with the wingspan of the plane that it would have made a much bigger hole.
-The only footage of the explosion at the petnagon is shown in the movie, and it shows no plane. One second you see the pentagon, the next second you see an explosion. Could be fake, I dont know. But seriously there would have HAD to be some footage.
-Closeups of the aftermath of the building show that, when you zoom in, you can see desks and other office equipment intact. They even show papers on the desks. Nothing looks burned. Could also be fake, but who knows.
-During a live newscast on a cable news channel (forgot which one), the anchorman says "Thats definetly not a commercial airliner, it looks like a cargo plane of some kind". Which raises the question--could all the victims who supposedly died on airplanes--never existed? I tell you one thing, I never believed that woman and her "let's roll!" story for one minute anyway. And isnt that the only account of a family member of someone who was on one of the planes? And come to think of it, has there ever been any testimony from any families of victims that were on board one of the planes that hit the Pentagon?
-Firefighters interviewed on 9/11 who escaped the building say that you could clearly hear explosives going off consequtively from floor to floor.
I dont believe everything in the movie, but I think someone's not telling the total truth about 9/11. You would think that in the biggest terrorist attack on American soil, someone would take credit for it immediatly. I mean, whats the point of your "Jihad" when you dont take credit for your attacks and get your point across?
I recommend this movie to anyone, regardless of what your stance is on Bush, the war on Terror or anything else. The questions in the movie deserved to be answered considering all the lives that were taken on 9/11. But sadly, these questions will go unanswered, especially considering that our current president lacks the ability to answer a question witha straight answer.