Everyone got their popcorn ready for Tuesday night?
Am I missing something?
Everyone got their popcorn ready for Tuesday night?
Am I missing something?
Essendon player tribunal results.
I think they're going to use the fact that it's been going on for so long to give them reduced sentences.
I think they're going to use the fact that it's been going on for so long to give them reduced sentences.
I look forward to the final decision in 2018.
Which clubs will have players sanctioned for betting on the outcome?
Collingwood boss Gary Pert: This is a major issue. It is really important that we talk about this
Pert: Today the players (have been) named so there is no question of the players on the list
Pert: I got a call on Friday morning from ASADA... when they rolled out who the two players were, I must admit I was pretty devastated
Pert: We are talking about two of the highest quality young men in our program. I think everyone would have felt the same surprise
Pert: My role was to make sure that we got hold of the players, linked them up with ASADA and allowed ASADA to go through the process
Pert says Keeffe and Thomas were "shell-shocked" when they received the news
Pert: We sit here very confidently today and can say this is not something has come from our program
Collingwood football director Neil Balme: It doesn't make any sense for either of them to use this. It was disbelief for both of them
Pert: The first question I asked ASADA when we found out it was two players was "is there any more?" They said no
Pert: There is no breach unless the B sample comes up with the same readings. Everyone is assumed to be innocent until then
So that's players at st kilda, fremantle and now collingwood who have tested positive to PEDs.
Boy oh boy wowee what irony.
Edit also wife beaters at north melb and carlton, drug dealers at gold coast, meth users celebrated as state heroes in west coast, and rapists in st kilda and essendon. Oh and assault with machetes by Melbourne player.
Define disrepute for me please. I'm confused as to what it means.
Should I say alleged? That word never seems to apply in afl talk when players clubs or coaches get banned before it hits the courts.
At least we can be assured every club has perfect governance and thus know richmond and west coast closely supervised ben cousins meth addiction whilst gold coast ensured no hiccups while their cocaine shipments were on the road.
Good to know collingwood and fremantle are perfect too
Also club legend of west coast tried to burn his ex wife's house down a few weeks ago.
Top blokes all round in this league
What are your thoughts on who will be playing finals this year? If we take Hawthorn, Port Adelaide, Sydney, Geelong, Fremantle and North Melbourne as given (though discuss if you disagree...) that leaves two spots.
Too much non-football football talk in here! Especially the OT tag referencing two near irrelevant players (one retired, one outside the 22).
Yes. Discussion of PED usage within the AFL is "non football".
Utterly unsurprising comment.
I'm not sold on North at all.
I couldn't be less excited about the AFL season. The only reason I 'follow' it is to participate with friends in fantasy football. So all I care about is tracking scoring rates etc.
The current drug incidents are deliciously ironic as the AFL has always projected itself as 'clean' for as long as I can remember. Yet they have had numerous positives tests in the last few years, never mind the whole Esssendon situation which stinks to high heaven.
Speaking of, shall we get some predictions going?
I suspect it will be guilty, Watson will lose his Brownlow, but the players will be 'ok' to start round 1.
I predict mass guilty verdicts, minimum 22 round bans, all backdated, legal action by players against the club.
Four more years. Four more years. Four more years of drama dragging on.
I'm honestly more concerned by the fact that, if this was going on, aren't players drug tested?
How did it never get picked up?
I'm honestly more concerned by the fact that, if this was going on, aren't players drug tested?
How did it never get picked up?
I'm honestly more concerned by the fact that, if this was going on, aren't players drug tested?
How did it never get picked up?
I'm pretty sure the evidence was written on confetti and scattered to the winds in the general direction of The Age and Herald Sun offices.
The reports have been reconstructed from that.
In February 2013, Essendon announced that had asked the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) to investigating the supplements program that Dank had overseen during 2012 season. A former player, Kyle Reimers, had claimed that the players were asked to sign waivers and were injected with supplements that were "pushing the boundaries".[3] Another former player, Mark McVeigh countered that the injections were only vitamins and all were completely legal and not on any World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) banned substance list. Dank left Essendon at the end of the 2012 season, and high-performance manager Dean 'The Weapon' Robinson was suspended from the club after the announcement of the investigation.[4] Stephen Dank controversially admitted to a Fairfax journalist that he had been using thymosin beta 4 on players form Essendon. When journalist Nick McKenzie pointed out that that drug was prohibited by WADA under its S2 classification, Dank hesitated and then seemed extremely surprised: "Well, that must have just only come in this year and I will get someone to speak to ASADA about that. That's just mind-blowing." After 24 hours, Dank informed Fairfax media that he was actually really talking about thymomodulin which was a permitted substance. Following the publication of the Australian Crime Commission report into Organised Crime and Drugs in Sport,[5] lawyers acting for Dank launched a $10m defamation suit alleging that various media outlets had falsely accused him of providing illegal drugs to elite athletes.[6] [7] [8]
Not guilty
Wowee
Surely ASADA and WADA will appeal?
I'm gonna need a break down of why there wasn't enough evidence. That AFL charge sheet from back in 2013 was incredibly damning, and the investigation continued for months after that. The behaviour of Essendon, Hird and Dank for the last two years has basically been evidence enough they were guilty as anything.
I've got very little doubt TB4 was used, but it will be interesting to see the decision. Was it a case of "We don't believe TB4 was used" (which would be ridiculous), or a case of "We believe it was used but we can't exactly say on which players" (which makes more sense but has to bring about further club sanctions).