So it's come to this:
I have to admit that I saw this article yesterday, and it just made me shake me head, until I saw this tweet about it:
Seeing that made me suddenly go holy shit. And just angrier that all the people who endured such a shitstorm last year had to suffer with police forces who lacked either the ability or the will to do anything, but yet are suddenly able to respond when they're the ones threatened.
At the same time, arrested people for this stuff is troublesome on a First Amendment ground.
I'm really honestly conflicted.
Lock and mock if old.
FOUR MEN IN Detroit were arrested over the past week for posts on social media that the police chief called threatening. One tweet that led to an arrest said that Micah Johnson, the man who shot police officers in Dallas last week, was a hero. None of the men have been named, nor have they been charged.
“I know this is a new issue, but I want these people charged with crimes,” said Detroit Police Chief James Craig. “I’ve directed my officers to prepare warrants for these four individuals, and we’ll see which venue is the best to pursue charges,” he added.
...
Last weekend in Connecticut, police arrested Kurt Vanzuuk after a tip for posts on Facebook that identified Johnson as a hero and called for police to be killed. He was charged with inciting injury to persons or property.
An Illinois woman, Jenesis Reynolds, was arrested for writing in a Facebook post that she would shoot an officer who would pull her over. “I have no problem shooting a cop for simple traffic stop cuz they’d have no problem doing it to me,” she wrote, according to the police investigation. She was charged with disorderly conduct.
In New Jersey, Rolando Medina was arrested and charged with cyber harassment. He allegedly posted on an unidentified social media platform that he would destroy local police headquarters. In Louisiana, Kemonte Gilmore was arrested for an online video in which he allegedly threatened a police officer. He was charged with public intimidation.
...
The policing of online threats is hardly a new issue. The Supreme Court set a precedent last year when it ruled that prosecutors pursuing a charge of communicating threats need to prove both that reasonable people would view the statement as a threat and that the intent was to threaten. Elonis v. United States dealt with a man who had posted violent rap lyrics about his estranged wife; the court reversed his conviction.
“After Dallas, threats may seem more threatening to police officers around the country,” said Daniel Medwed, professor of law at Northeastern University. “We might be seeing more arrests right now because the police will interpret that they have probable cause to make the arrest,” he said. “But that doesn’t mean in the end that this will result in convictions,” he added.
I have to admit that I saw this article yesterday, and it just made me shake me head, until I saw this tweet about it:
Seeing that made me suddenly go holy shit. And just angrier that all the people who endured such a shitstorm last year had to suffer with police forces who lacked either the ability or the will to do anything, but yet are suddenly able to respond when they're the ones threatened.
At the same time, arrested people for this stuff is troublesome on a First Amendment ground.
I'm really honestly conflicted.
Lock and mock if old.