In terms of the other nominated works:I think it's deserving, but I wonder what the competition was like that year.
I loved the pilot. Book was terrible.
Great timing for me I just got finished reading the book last night. I must say I was quite disappointed with the book so I'm very happy from the two episodes I've already watched that it doesn't seem to be following the book at all.
Loved the pilot, SUPER excited to see the rest. Time for bed then this and Jessica Jones tomorrow! Damn good weekend!
Glad I'm not the only one. Everyone regards it so highly I thought I was missing something.
Fell asleep during 1st and 2nd episode.
Do they explain how the Allies lost by any chance or is it just the backdrop? If not, I'll just imagine that Hitler stopped interfering with military projects and a shitload of other things instead of trying to alter something for his personal reasons or make the next big super-tank that isn't practical.
Love the premise and hope I can watch it soon. Might have a free Prime trial to use once this hack is cleared up at least.
If I recall correctly, in this alternate reality America at the onset of WW2 is weaker than the America in our world. FDR was assassinated in 1933 and the Great Depression lasted longer. But that's from the novel this TV series is based on.
Anyone recommending this book today must be a white supremacist or something. Most chapters read like an uncomfortable anecdote from your grandfather. If there's any deeper value or meaning it completely eluded me.Glad I'm not the only one. Everyone regards it so highly I thought I was missing something.
This is the show about if the Nazi's took over America?
I would have loved to have known that. Maybe next time have the subtitle for the thread make sense instead of trying to be clever.
Yeah, but it always seems kind of wistful, like, "We could have been so advanced!"Of course, they were also behind the Allies in plenty of stuff and most of Hitler's superweapons were either plain garbage or childish fantasies, but coupled with their sense of aesthetics and a penchant for human experimentation, it's no wonder that Nazis have a rep for being the original high-tech villains. Their weapons development strategy followed the old practice of throwing all kinds of stuff against the wall and see what stuck, so when Nazis tried, they were REALLY out there.
I would tell you to read more books, but you must be doing something right if The Man in the High Castle is the "worst thing that I have [ever] read." I can understand a modern reader not appreciating it, but it's a well-written book. Dick wanted to be a serious writer, and this is one of his barely-sci-fi works. I also think he mostly wanted to write about the I, Ching, which was popular with hippies. He might have even sparked that popularity. I've seen Dick criticized for being clichéd, when he invented those clichés to begin with.Yup right there with you guys. Probably the worst thing that I have read.
Way too much effort to look at the first post in a thread I guess.. And it's also a rather famous book so most people wouldn't need to be spoon fed the plot in a thread title..
I don't intend to click every single thread title on OT to see if it interests me. It would be a lovely thing if they used the allotted text space to inform instead of do whatever the OP intended. Is it so wrong to want titles to be informative instead of insular?
It is a lot to ask and removes much of the potential for creative thread titles. I don't recall many TV show threads that put the premise in the title.
It's a lot to ask for info instead of "creativity?" Leave the writing to the people who make the TV show, movie, book, music or whatever.
Man, there's no way I'm going to get through this and Jessica Jones in the same weekend. Bah.
How do spoilers work in this thread? I've just finished episode 4. Cracking stuff so far.
How do spoilers work in this thread? I've just finished episode 4. Cracking stuff so far.
We typically do two weeks with tags for streaming shows that drop all the episodes at once. December 1st is fine.The Jessica Jones thread asks to mark spoilers until December 1. Maybe we should follow the same timeline.
I loved the pilot. Book was terrible.
Great timing for me I just got finished reading the book last night. I must say I was quite disappointed with the book so I'm very happy from the two episodes I've already watched that it doesn't seem to be following the book at all.
Glad I'm not the only one. Everyone regards it so highly I thought I was missing something.
Yup right there with you guys. Probably the worst thing that I have read.
Anyone recommending this book today must be a white supremacist or something. Most chapters read like an uncomfortable anecdote from your grandfather. If there's any deeper value or meaning it completely eluded me.
Anyone recommending this book today must be a white supremacist or something. Most chapters read like an uncomfortable anecdote from your grandfather. If there's any deeper value or meaning it completely eluded me.
Debating... should I go get the book from the library and read it before trying the series?
Well, it is a poor book.
I don't think it is Dick's best work by any means, but it is far from a poor book. What it is, is a story about circumstance and society through a what-if alternate reality filter. It's not a good thriller. It's not a good conspiracy story. It's not a particularly good dramatic tale. But I would say it was never intended to be any of that. So... expectations I guess?
It would be like comparing Total Recall or Minority Report to the original stories.
I'll see which hobby I can catch up with first, my active reading list or my DVR backlog. Fallout 4 addiction has decimated all other recreation.I'd probably watch the show first. I tend to be disappointed by adaptations, so seeing the show first helps me appreciate both.
That being said, I've already read the book and it's pretty good. It will be interesting to see how they adapt the title. Dick's works always feel a little loose and rugged, which I think helps the director/showrunner modify it to his own vision.
Wasn't there another movie or TV series a while back about an alternative post-WWII future with the Nazis winning?
I can't remember the name, but basically...The Nazis didn't defeat the United States, but they managed to take over all of Europe and Russia and it was basically North America vs. the rest of the Nazi world.
BUT, one of the main reasons for this was because the holocaust was successfully kept a secret the entire time and there was less of an alliance against Hitler due to that fact. The movie basically revolved around some people or agents trying to dig up information and proof that Hitler had murdered millions of Jews and other people in concentration camps and that this was what the occupied world needed to see to start a rebellion, backed by the US.
Or something like that. It may have been a History channel special.
In the right hands, people can take Dick's ideas and adapt them fairly liberally to good effect. But then we also get endless supplies of mediocre action-thrillers with sci-go backdrops.
Anyone recommending this book today must be a white supremacist or something. Most chapters read like an uncomfortable anecdote from your grandfather. If there's any deeper value or meaning it completely eluded me.
Are you able to distinguish between a story that is about racism and a story that is racist?
wikipedia said:The American Nazi Party put the book on its recommended reading list, despite the satirical intent of the work. In Spinrad's own words:
To make damn sure that even the historically naive and entirely unselfaware reader got the point, I appended a phony critical analysis of Lord of the Swastika, in which the psychopathology of Hitler's saga was spelled out by a tendentious pedant in words of one syllable. Almost everyone got the point... And yet one review appeared in a fanzine that really gave me pause. "This is a rousing adventure story and I really enjoyed it," the gist of it went. "Why did Spinrad have to spoil the fun with all this muck about Hitler?"