ElectricBlanketFire
Member
Because it wasn't reported until yesterday?
People reacting to news as it's announced, go figure!
It's truly baffling how people don't understand this.
Because it wasn't reported until yesterday?
People reacting to news as it's announced, go figure!
People can be outraged by more than one thing. The reason why people tend to focus on the smaller issue is that it's seems more attainable to enact change. It raises awareness on larger issues. It gets more people involved.
Yeah, but there will be outrage for a week or two, then everyone will move on to the next thing and forget about it. It's like clockwork for this type of stuff.
I understand people being upset about it, but not to this degree. Especially since the lion was probably near the end of its life regardless.
Yeah, but there will be outrage for a week or two, then everyone will move on to the next thing and forget about it. It's like clockwork for this type of stuff.
Kay Burley on Sky news; he was old and going to die soon any way. What's the big deal...
Oh lord.
Because it wasn't reported until yesterday?
People reacting to news as it's announced, go figure!
Yes but with this degree of shock and outrage, people clearly didn't notice CECIL wasn't around for a month.
Most of us don't live in Zimbabwe to know Cecil's daily comings and goings. How would anyone but the researchers notice it?
As for why they didn't release any info about it til now, sadly I don't have that information for you, though I could take a guess that it has something to do with coordinating with local authorities and not wanting to prematurely drop info during an open investigation.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
I don't see why that should even matter if it is trueMost of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Dude is a scumbag, but this internet mob justice is very scary, honestly.
???Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Yes but with this degree of shock and outrage, people clearly didn't notice CECIL wasn't around for a month.
Why is this a point to even brought up? We had to know of the lion before the tragedy to occur for us to have a valid reason to be angry?
wow.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
I understand people being upset about it, but not to this degree. Especially since the lion was probably near the end of its life regardless.
Honestly I doubt anyone would care if someone did that...
Shitposting is a banable offense. Your posts have no other point to them than to just troll the people that are reacting emotionally to this story.
Dude is a scumbag, but this internet mob justice is very scary, honestly.
Wut.
In what thread are you where I'm shit posting. I responded to a conversation on a previous page about why there seemed to be this strange reaction to this story and how this specific animal was being personified when no other animal that dies in the same way every day is. This post is just a culmination of that point.
I didn't say people can't be outraged, I (and others) said it was an odd reaction to a news story that was also reported very oddly.
Weirdest thread I've posted in, man.
I just want to know why you think people need to know of something/someone in order to have a good reason to be upset? I mean... what are you getting at when you say "A month ago you didn't even know that lion existed so why are you so upset now?"
There's nothing odd about being upset or angry about poaching. That this particular lion was characteristically non-aggressive and trusting of people is what makes the story even shittier.Wut.
In what thread are you where I'm shit posting. I responded to a conversation on a previous page about why there seemed to be this strange reaction to this story and how this specific animal was being personified when no other animal that dies in the same way every day is. This post is just a culmination of that point.
I didn't say people can't be outraged, I (and others) said it was an odd reaction to a news story that was also reported very oddly.
Weirdest thread I've posted in, man.
Wut.
In what thread are you where I'm shit posting. I responded to a conversation on a previous page about why there seemed to be this strange reaction to this story and how this specific animal was being personified when no other animal that dies in the same way every day is. This post is just a culmination of that point.
I didn't say people can't be outraged, I (and others) said it was an odd reaction to a news story that was also reported very oddly.
Weirdest thread I've posted in, man.
There's nothing odd about being upset or angry about poaching. That this particular lion was characteristically non-aggressive and trusting of people is what makes the story even shittier.
Give me a break, you knew exactly what you were doing. If you don't want to give a shit that's your prerogative, but don't insult others for expressing some feeling about the story just because they didn't have a personal tie to the lion or because the media didn't pick up the story until yesterday (and therefore, no one but the researchers, Palmer and his guides could have possibly known either).
It's pretty clear that people aren't upset that that specific lion was killed but that a lion was killed in such an illegal and unethical manner: lured out of the park, etc. But you already know that and you're just trying to get a rise out of people and then you'll play wide eyed and confused when called on it. So proceed.
I genuinely have no clue what you're talking about. I woke up, saw all this buzz on the internet, saw this thread, and posted. I have like five posts here, from one page back. Please go read them and then point to me where I insult people for expressing feelings. Give me a break.
Ok, I'll respond to this one point because I think this is a misinterpretation or a misunderstanding. According to the news story the hunter and the dentist did not know this was a protected animal. They didn't deliberately target this specific lion because it was Cecil. This is just a case of hunting gone wrong. So I genuinely don't see anything "unethical" or malicious about this. I don't like or condone hunting, I'm just saying I think this story is being played up insanely as if these evil villains plotted to kill THE Cecil the lion. And I think you're all falling for it. That's all I have to say.
Dude is a scumbag, but this internet mob justice is very scary, honestly.
Ok, I'll respond to this one point because I think this is a misinterpretation or a misunderstanding. According to the news story the hunter and the dentist did not know this was a protected animal. They didn't deliberately target this specific lion because it was Cecil. This is just a case of hunting gone wrong. So I genuinely don't see anything "unethical" or malicious about this. I don't like or condone hunting, I'm just saying I think this story is being played up insanely as if these evil villains plotted to kill THE Cecil the lion. And I think you're all falling for it. That's all I have to say.
I SHOT AN ANIMAL MINDING ITS OWN BUSINESS WITH A GUN. I'M THE ULTIMATE MAN!
These type of people make me fucking sick.
And to those of you questioning why some of us are emotionally attached to these animals, why ARENT you? There are 4 white rhinos left in existence and you better believe it breaks my heart knowing that such a beautiful creature is going to NEVER BE SEEN AGAIN in the coming years. Humans have the capabilities to be care takers for these wonderful animals, yet we take a 50,000 paycheck, throw aside our morality and plant a lions head on our mantle. If you can't see why that's fucked up then I can't help you.
This is just a case of hunting gone wrong. So I genuinely don't see anything "unethical" or malicious about this.
She really is a horrible, horrible person.Kay Burley on Sky news; he was old and going to die soon any way. What's the big deal...
Oh lord.
Why are you ignoring other posters calling you out on your bs?
This story made me very sad. This old great Lion is just murdered because some fuckbag wanted to claim its death. Disgusting.
Are people given a grace period to admit they're trolling?
Again, the conversation from the previous page was essentially "why are people choosing this exact situation to get so emotional (the Jimmy Kimmel video was referenced)" and I chimed in that I was confused too. The only thing I could think of was that this was some beloved, well-know, celebrity animal that everyone had grown up together with. But that's not the case. So the question essentially became -
- why is this animal's death such a big thing when another lion died yesterday the same way and today and tomorrow?
Why is the "Cecil" part so important? It's not. But I have no idea where people got the impression that I said "you are not allowed to feel bad about this story."
I just confused by your "my point is.." statement. So, you do feel like a person needs to know someone/something beforehand in order to be outraged? edit: and if it's not reported/found out about instantly the event is no longer worth reporting?
Just a friendly reminder that lions are awesome... and also a threatened species on the decline.
I genuinely have no clue what you're talking about. I woke up, saw all this buzz on the internet, saw this thread, and posted. I have like five posts here, from one page back. Please go read them and then point to me where I insult people for expressing feelings. Give me a break.
Ok, I'll respond to this one point because I think this is a misinterpretation or a misunderstanding. According to the news story the hunter and the dentist did not know this was a protected animal. They didn't deliberately target this specific lion because it was Cecil. This is just a case of hunting gone wrong. So I genuinely don't see anything "unethical" or malicious about this. I don't like or condone hunting, I'm just saying I think this story is being played up insanely as if these evil villains plotted to kill THE Cecil the lion. And I think you're all falling for it. That's all I have to say.
Most of you have never heard of Cecil once before yesterday is my whole point.
Some of us find emotional attachment to animals very strange. I mean people see humans die and don't care. They then see an animal hurt and go berserk. I find it insulting and bizarre.
Ok, I'll respond to this one point because I think this is a misinterpretation or a misunderstanding. According to the news story the hunter and the dentist did not know this was a protected animal. They didn't deliberately target this specific lion because it was Cecil. This is just a case of hunting gone wrong. So I genuinely don't see anything "unethical" or malicious about this. I don't like or condone hunting, I'm just saying I think this story is being played up insanely as if these evil villains plotted to kill THE Cecil the lion. And I think you're all falling for it. That's all I have to say.
Palmer had a permit to hunt bears within a certain area near Phillips, in the north of the state. But on September 1, 2006, he was part of a group of people who killed a black bear 40 miles outside this permitted zone, according to the court documents from April 2008.
Realizing what they had done, the group agreed that "if any authorities were to ask where the bear had been killed, they would say" it was hunted within the correct area, the documents added.
They transported the carcass to a registration station where they certified the animal had been killed legally, the documents said, adding that the body was later taken to Minnesota, where Palmer lives.
Palmer was charged with knowingly making false statement to an agent of the Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, having "falsely stated that he thought the bear had been killed legally" during interviews with officials the next month.
He was also convicted in Minnesota court in 2003 for fishing without a licence.
No, the lion was living on protected land and baited out into another area where the hunter could "legally" shoot and stalk him.I got bombarded with like 10 quotes, I'm not going to reply to each as they all essentially said the same thing. And I'm genuinely blown away by it. Like I'm sitting here wondering how so many people interpreted my posts a completely different way than what's written. It's like people in this thread were waiting to jump on something. I'm not even disagreeing with them or the spirit of this thread. Fuck the whole African hunting scene. I was just trying to understand why this specific story blew up this way, and I feel like the reporting of it is sneaky in a way. But apparently I'm an asshole that hates lions and thinks everyone here is not allowed express their outrage. I don't know man.
?????
Did I read the story wrong? Doesn't it say the guide and the hunter had all the permits but they went onto the wrong land? Please, correct me if I'm wrong. Is the story being reported that this group specifically hunted this animal knowing what/who it was? I honestly did not get that from reading the story.