Geometric-Crusher
"Nintendo games are like indies, and worth at most $19" 🤡
Although Xbox hardware business is almost dead, the Xbox division is like Jason, rumors point out that the new Xbox will be more powerful than the PS6 , however the price will be without subsidy, that is, $1200 and up. This made me think about the extent to which processing power is important.
I'll avoid citing extreme examples like the Neo Geo AES or 3DO, where the technology was impressive but the price definitely reduced them to niche consoles.
The PS5 Pro is the best example. The best it can offer compared to the PS5 is running quality mode at 60fps. The PS5 runs performance mode at 60fps. In practice, we're going from 1440p60 to 4K 60fps. So, even though the Xbox is more powerful, the difference would only be a higher number in the dynamic resolution range.
Having the most powerful console (even if it's 30% powerful) is good because 90% of games are multiplatform.
A true strategy of having the most powerful console is similar to the strategy of having the least powerful console. That is, it's necessary to offer many exclusive games to take advantage of the difference, as third-party developers won't do it, so having a powerful console is a thankless strategy.
Higher R&D costs
Higher subsidies
Higher spending on games
more powerful 30%, what do you think about it?
I'll avoid citing extreme examples like the Neo Geo AES or 3DO, where the technology was impressive but the price definitely reduced them to niche consoles.
The PS5 Pro is the best example. The best it can offer compared to the PS5 is running quality mode at 60fps. The PS5 runs performance mode at 60fps. In practice, we're going from 1440p60 to 4K 60fps. So, even though the Xbox is more powerful, the difference would only be a higher number in the dynamic resolution range.
Having the most powerful console (even if it's 30% powerful) is good because 90% of games are multiplatform.
A true strategy of having the most powerful console is similar to the strategy of having the least powerful console. That is, it's necessary to offer many exclusive games to take advantage of the difference, as third-party developers won't do it, so having a powerful console is a thankless strategy.
Higher R&D costs
Higher subsidies
Higher spending on games
more powerful 30%, what do you think about it?