Support NeoGAF

[panda21]

I have a feeling Norman Chan might be eating some eggs

 

[Shao Kahn Brewing a Stew]

Gotta admit; it's much more prettier. Did they hire apple's old engineers or something?

 

[edgefusion]

I wonder what a new iPod Nano would look like if Apple used some of the older style Nanos to inform the new one? Like if they fused these two:

Oh well I guess we'll never know as they decided to rip-off the Lumia instead.

 

[SJRB]

400 bucks for 64 gig is disgusting.

 

[dorkimoe]

so they took the store down for nothing then? or maybe just the earpods

 

[illmatic19]

Jesus christ Apple. I could just pay $100 more for an iPad. Looks like I'll be staying with my current iPod.

 

[BolognaSoup]

that loop would look ridiculous on the iphone.

Without the loop genius.

 

[AlexMeloche]

ugh. this is lame.

the new ipod touch with all the improvements starts at 299.

the old model is still 200 (and 250).

bah

The old Touch 8GB was 200$. Now it's 16GB for the same price.

 

[Joel Was Right]

I think I am most excited about the new mini player more than the entire iPhone 5 unveiling.

Undoubtedly the highlight of the show

 

[BFIB]

The new Nanos look slick.

 

[fluffydelusions]

300 bucks for an ipod, fuckoff apple... but I want to try out those ear pods

I just laugh saying that aloud. lol

 

[CrunchinJelly]

No 8GB Nano is weird.

Jumps from 2GB shuffle to 16GB Nano.

 

[Gandie]

So 399 for the biggest Ipod Touch, what are they gonna charge for the Ipad Mini? 499??

 

[Nevasleep]

I still can't believe how blatant their iPod Lumia copy is.

iPod making it look good. The Lumia has always been ugly.

 

[AHA-Lambda]

Sorry so wtf are earPods? O__o

 

[PapaJustify]

What did you expect? White earbuds are iconic at Apple.

I am not good at irony.

 

[Patrick Bateman]

"And iPhone 5. The thinnest, fastest and best iPhone we have ever shipped. Powered by iPhone 6."

WAT?

 

[siddhu33]

"Now with 200 new features."

Really?

 

[Vanillalite]

$299 seems expensive...

 

[kingocfs]

Who is the $299 iPod touch for?

 

[Kyon]

why cant iphone 5 have all these colors?

 

[Hari Seldon]

Can't wait for the head-fi.org review of these earpods hahahaha.

 

[scorcho]

Must be nice to work on the Earpods project for 3 years. At some point in 2011 they'd be like "hey kag what are you up to?" and I'd be all, "still chugging away at these earpods man. I'm on revision 239b05 and I can't quite get the correct shade of toothpaste white to match my cord."

sometime around year 2 they realized the breakthrough in designing earpods - that the product must direct music INTO one's ears.

hopefully Apple patents this directing music into ear technology, as it sounds revolutionary.

 

[outunderthestars]

$299 for the new iPod Touch?

Fuck that.

it's the same price as the current gen 32GB model....

 

[flyover]

$299 for the new iPod Touch?

Fuck that.

Wish there was still a cheaper 16GB model of it, though I know that'd be too little space for most people.

 

[Somnid]

Camera must have really cost them on the iPod Touch. Don't really want to pay $300. More space doesn't matter because I don't even fill my 8GB.

 

[goodfella]

But not the thinnest.

'20% less features, while still taking the same amount of time! Our writing team are very proud.'

 

[bbagwell]

Disgusting. Each one of those slovenly freaks who walked up on stage looked worse than the last. Have some god damned pride in your appearance and tuck your fucking shirts in.

I like the new Nano!

 

[Radec]

Farewell iPod Classic.

I hope mine doesn't die since there will be no replacement for this..

 

[Slurpy2k20]

OH GOD

Fuck Apple for not upgrading the Classic...again. *hugs old Classic*

I'm sorry, but you're insane if you think Apple cares about the Classic, or should care about the Classic. There's no reason in hell they would want to bring attention to it. It's still available for the small percentage of people who want it, and thats fine. Marketing it would be useless.

 

[Reagan's BR]

I still can't believe how blatant their iPod Lumia copy is.

Not really, its not like they waited for the lumia and then copied it.

 

[Leona Lewis]

The new Nanos cost $20 more than last gen...

Gross. And they look horrible.

 

[sikkinixx]

Dat price on the iPod Touch... wow.

 

[kagete]

Employees? Are they going to do a Foxconn happy factory worker montage?

 

[neemmss]

I still can't believe how blatant their iPod Lumia copy is.

What the fak are you talking about? The iPod line had colors before Nokia even had the Lumia's.

Ex.

 

[AHA-Lambda]

The new Nanos look slick.

How are they similar? =/

 

[Husker86]

It's 11.1mm with the hump taken into account.

Daamn, looks like they need some Apple/Sony camera magic.

 

[Raistlin]

Look who's well enough to work from home. =P

I just woke up =(

 

[Anatoli Bacharach]

Did they finally kill the iPod classic or are they just not showing it?

 

[vagabondarts]

iPod touch @ $299 is ridiculous

 

[Gomu Gomu]

So, that's it?

 

[wanders]

Damn I was hoping for a 249 iPad mini

 

[CrankyJay]

Foo Fighters time! They all got free iPhone 5's.

 

[richiek]

So, they're gonna announce the iPad Mini, or what?

 

[jyoung188]

;__; guess I'll stick with my 4 year old iPod classic.

 

[Kyon]

WHEW?

 

[smallios74]

"Now when you look at each of these, they are incredible industry leading innovation by themselves. But what sets them apart and what places us way ahead of the competition is how well they work together."

Hmm not to sure if i agree with this statement.

 

[Horse Detective]

Bell sprout bell sprout.

Bell pod. bell pod

 

[Izick]

These are the best iPods we have ever made.

YOU ARE A LIAR!

 

[upandaway]

I don't... really.. feel that good about this.

Man.

It's kinda like, man, you had 2 years to do stuff. What did you do these 2 years? It's 2 years.