• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Are you ready for the Porn Tax?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xe4

Banned
I know how the FCC has defined it, in practice. Bare female nipples are considered porn unless it belongs to an indigenous African woman. Bare buttocks and any exposed genitalia or pubic hair are porn. The act of sex is not porn if the above qualifications aren't met, which is why you can sometimes see sex scenes on tv. As long as theres no nudity shown, its not porn

But that falls apart very quickly. Under that definition, Game of Thrones is porn.
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
Are they arguing that if I have to pay $20 for porn that I wouldn't shell out $100 for a prostitute? Or that I would just never be tempted to canoodle my noodle in the first place because I would not want to pay for either? Both situations sound ridiculous.

On the technical side, how in God's name would they enforce this? An honesty system? I'm sure folks will be as honest as teenagers are when they hit the "Are you over 18?" message on their favorite spank bank.

It isn't really impossible to implement. States would just have to be willing to do it. Website would track IP, say you need to have paid tax to access site, you would then login with the state ID you set up when you paid the tax, porn site would have to have access to state list and cross reference your email.

Yeah you could VPN around it and just have a foreign IP, but a lot of folks don't know all about that and would just pay the tax.
 

Goro Majima

Kitty Genovese Member
On the technical side, how in God's name would they enforce this? An honesty system? I'm sure folks will be as honest as teenagers are when they hit the "Are you over 18?" message on their favorite spank bank.

Who even knows how this would work since you'd have to pay $20 to go on Twitter or post on Reddit since there's hardcore porn all over those sites.
 

FyreWulff

Member
How would something like this even work? I assume it would have to be implemented on the OS level.

it can't.

domain filter? porn sites would just provide randomly generated alternate domain names.
IP? proxy.

big sites like Reddit that have porn subsections use https globally now so you couldn't even tell which section you are on.

ISP level? lol no.

somehow make MS implement it in Windows? throw on Ubuntu.
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
It won't work because it's not a tax on goods or services, but an access fee in general for material of a particular nature. The government is saying "You can't view audio visual content in general without paying up."

That's a violation of free speech.

If they actually taxed pornography and used the money to fight trafficking, it would be a different
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
Who even knows how this would work since you'd have to pay $20 to go on Twitter or post on Reddit since there's hardcore porn all over those sites.

Yep the states would have to have a list of porn sites they target. Likely just the biggest well known ones would be affected.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
This won't survive the supreme court and they know it.

But they will win points with their base for trying to "do something" about porn.

This is the 3d chess that keeps the GOP popular among conservatives: their theatrical game in on another level.

This is not going to be popular among conservatives. Why would you assume conservatives don't like porn?
 
You wanna fight human trafficking? Start by being more leniant in immigration. Allow them to go to the police without fear that they'll be deported back into the hands of traffickers.
 

Bluth54

Member
It isn't really impossible to implement. States would just have to be willing to do it. Website would track IP, say you need to have paid tax to access site, you would then login with the state ID you set up when you paid the tax, porn site would have to have access to state list and cross reference your email.

Yeah you could VPN around it and just have a foreign IP, but a lot of folks don't know all about that and would just pay the tax.

But this is apparently for new computers only so having some sort of state ID you login to a website with wouldn't really work.
 
This is not going to be popular among conservatives. Why would you assume conservatives don't like porn?

Conservatives love porn, which is why places like Utah are the largest consumers. But, due to religious convictions, conservatives feel like they have to fight against porn even though they love to consume it. Its the same approach that led to prohibition.
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
But this is apparently for new computers only so having some sort of state ID you login to a website with wouldn't really work.

Ah so then it would have to be some kind of browser blocker built into new hardware you pay $20 to remove. I suppose they would make some money but a lot of people would find a way around it, clean install windows, maybe as simple as just using a different browser. I don't know if there are system wide blockers that would block domain names on any browser. And yeah porn sites would just get around this with different domain names.
 

FyreWulff

Member
You wanna fight human trafficking? Start by being more leniant in immigration. Allow them to go to the police without fear that they'll be deported back into the hands of traffickers.

also stop increasing the punishments for being a prostitute. decriminalize that part and go after the johns.

so many frustrating occurrences where kids and women get trafficked and then they get fingerprinted and sent to jail for being a prostitute.. when they were forced to do it.... it's fucking insanity
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Conservatives love porn, which is why places like Utah are the largest consumers. But, due to religious convictions, conservatives feel like they have to fight against porn even though they love to consume it. Its the same approach that led to prohibition.

I don't think that's true. It's a small minority of conservatives that care about this stuff and it's an actively stupid strategy that will never pass anywhere. There's a reason why all the dumb causes conservatives pay lip service to in order to get elected never actually go anywhere - because it isn't worth spending political capital on something you don't actually care about.

Prohibition was its own weird animal that was a product of the times.
 

Apathy

Member
This won't survive the supreme court and they know it.

But they will win points with their base for trying to "do something" about porn.

This is the 3d chess that keeps the GOP popular among conservatives: their theatrical game in on another level.



giphy.gif

Funyn considering how much porn their base watches. hypocrisy is alive and well in red states
 

Lkr

Member
Wait they think people are more likely to hire prostitutes if porn is easily accessible than if you force someone to pay a tax on it? That's fucking hilariously dumb
 

NandoGip

Member
Jesus christ the disconnect never ceases to surprise me. These men are all liars too, theyre usually the worst of all
 

Moose Biscuits

It would be extreamly painful...
I think a better alternative would be to implement a percentage tax (like a sales tax) that's based on how much porn you buy. I would be glad to pay a percentage on the money I spend on pornography.
 
is this true? my guess is that sex trafficking is actually probably lower than at any point in human history?

I am on phone so having difficulty finding the original source but I find a lot of government sites saying "Human trafficking is the world's fastest growing criminal enterprise, valued to be an estimated $32 billion-a-year global industry."

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ri/pr/...highlighted-during-national-slavery-and-human

Given population growth it makes sense that human trafficking grows.
 

willy_2

Neo Member
forcing manufacturers to install filters on all new devices will never work but it doesn't mean they won't try. i'm surprised no one has reported much on this when it's been in the works for years.
 

Kurdel

Banned
This is not going to be popular among conservatives. Why would you assume conservatives don't like porn?

Conservatives are less likely to like accept porn, and the religious base of the party will applaud any effort to curb it.

Did you actually think this wasn't a contentious issue for the american right?

Majority-Of-Americans-Find-Pornography-Unacceptable-Gallup-2.jpg
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Conservatives are less likely to like accept porn, and the religious base of the party will applaud any effort to curb it.

Did you actually think this wasn't a contentious issue for the american right?

Majority-Of-Americans-Find-Pornography-Unacceptable-Gallup-2.jpg
It isn't. It's just a thing they pay lip service to. Studies show that conservatives consume more porn than liberals do to begin with.

So the question is whether you think conservative leaders want to spend political capital on an obviously unconstitutional law that goes to an issue that conservative voters are only paying lip service to (not to mention that liberals and independents actively oppose it). There's an actual reason why the GOP hasn't passed much of anything despite having all 3 branches of government. You don't have the resources to simply pass anything you want on the grounds that you saw a poll that says your base doesn't like a Thing. Congress couldn't get rid of Obamacare despite it being deeply unpopular with their base and its repeal being the signature campaign promise of the entire party.
 

ericexpo

Member
Makes no sense how would a computer tell difference between porn and anything else. Like so I have to pay for National Geographic to be unlocked or a Victoria's Secret catalog. Do I pay twice if hbo show has nudity.
Do furries pay for cartoons?
 
Hmm...I'm getting vibes of the "War on Drugs" here. Unscientific correlation that makes zero sense, and if you follow the money, likely leads back to lobbyist in the religious and law enforcement realms.
 
Conservatives are less likely to like accept porn, and the religious base of the party will applaud any effort to curb it.

Did you actually think this wasn't a contentious issue for the american right?

Majority-Of-Americans-Find-Pornography-Unacceptable-Gallup-2.jpg

It's funny what conservatives say vs what they do because I'm pretty sure Utah leads America in porn consumption per capita.

These are the dark days I always knew would come. This is why I kept The Archive while you fools placed your trust in The Stream.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom