It's not all about excitement! Especially downballot! Expecting Obama '08 as the norm is a very bad idea!I live in a NY brooklyn bubble.
But seriously - I WANT her to win. I just don't see the segment that gets excited for this.
It's not all about excitement! Especially downballot! Expecting Obama '08 as the norm is a very bad idea!I live in a NY brooklyn bubble.
But seriously - I WANT her to win. I just don't see the segment that gets excited for this.
It's not all about excitement! Especially downballot! Expecting Obama '08 as the norm is a very bad idea!
It does if they're running in a red state trending purple and must flip dissafected I/R voters in order to win. Especially if Flake is primaried by an even crazier person.Nothing says Democrat like "BOOTSRAPS" and "Common ground"
VA's statewide D candidates over the past 2 decades have done quite well with a collective charisma of dried toast! (Webb probably the most charismatic, actually)Okay, but just as I have zero evidence, so do you. I'll wait for polling.
*Face-palm, Face-palm,Face-palm*
This the reality of living in a heavy red state. I know I live in that racist shit-hole that is Arizona! I'll take a "Republican lite" with a D by her name then the hardcore Republican she is running against! She can probably be reasoned with and history tells is this is how you get the progressive agenda to make traction in red states.
Okay, but just as I have zero evidence, so do you. I'll wait for polling.
Nothing says Democrat like "BOOTSRAPS" and "Common ground"
She made her way to Congress, Sinema says, with hard work and help from "family, church and, sometimes, even the government."
we'll take what we can get
Oh I'm with ya. I guess I'll take a Blue Dog over a hard R. Progress is progressIt does if they're running in a red state trending purple and must flip dissafected I/R voters in order to win. Especially if Flake is primaried by an even crazier person.
Your state went from blue dominated to red dominated w/ the decline of union power and the rust belt. It is very different from traditionally red states that are trending purple or blue.You're talkin' to a guy who lived in West Virginia for twenty years, the only southern(ish) state with a 95% white population. I know all about living in heavy red, racist shitholes. Manchin survives on name recognition and only got in because he was elected before the state turned sharply right. You have to search far and wide to find the people who vote for Manchin because they appreciate his moderate approach. I'm skeptical about this strategy in Arizona but if it's between Sinema or Abboud, I have to admit Sinema is the most feasible between the two so I'll take it. I don't really give a shit about "purity tests", I just worry about Sinema failing to get people out to support her. As mentioned though, it seems she's the best shot unless someone else pops up.
She's an atheist? Then prop her up.
Just don't mention it to the general populace
Only conservatives yell that bullshit. Bootstraps mainly. And common ground? Hearing that is hard to swallow when the Overton Window is so far right.i honestly don't want common ground if we can take the majority.huh?
.
Only conservatives yell that bullshit. Bootstraps mainly. And common ground? Hearing that is hard to swallow when the Overton Window is so far right.i honestly don't want common ground if we can take the majority.
Your state went from blue dominated to red dominated w/ the decline of union power and the rust belt. It is very different from traditionally red states that are trending purple or blue.
Yeah no thanks. Democrats don't want republican-lite and republicans don't want republican-lite so I don't know why we keep pushing this dumb strategy.
also lol, church, Kyrsten. You are an atheist.
She's an atheist who mentioned church? Huh.
Only conservatives yell that bullshit. Bootstraps mainly. And common ground? Hearing that is hard to swallow when the Overton Window is so far right.i honestly don't want common ground if we can take the majority.
She's an atheist who mentioned church? Huh.
Obviously a Democrat, but I'd rather run with someone who's actually appealing to a tangible demographic. People like Manchin are in office from name recognition and getting in before the state swing hard and fast to the right, not so much because the people of WV have a nuanced appreciation for his moderate approach to governance. Why on earth is a Trump voter going to go for a moderate democrat when they can just go for the real deal? Seems like we'd be losing more people on the left than we'd be gaining in the middle. Don't think modern democrats have much tolerance for people who will work with Trump in any capacity on conservative initiatives.
I just find it hard to believe that the modern Trump voter would consider anyone with a D beside their name, moderate or not. This is the same party that thought fairly-moderate-democrat-Obama was literally a communist.
Hillary isn't remotely as conservative as this person though.
Edit- post just above mine is the proof in the pudding that it doesn't matter what your beliefs are, a D beside your name makes you a radical progressive. "Moderate" voters will eat that shit up. Might as well actually run a radical progressive and at least soak up the votes on the left.
Well Arizona is very conservative
I just wonder which church. Maybe a universalist church or something. I'm a Christian but I'd vote for an atheist or Muslim over somebody who practices hate in the name of Christianity any day.Politics ... in Arizona
She's also openly bisexual
Cool person
Meh. We should take what we can get. For Arizona this would be a win. Baby steps.
democrats are always so eager to shoot themselves in the foot, dang