• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

ARROW Season 2 |OT| Back in a Flash

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RellyRell28

Banned
1622609_519836548136298_170616852_n.jpg
 
N

NobleGundam

Banned
I'd like it if Nightwing were to show up sometime later in the show. Perhaps in Blood Haven where Dead Shot was in before from last season.
 
E

Error

Jealous of the Glory that is Johnny Depp
That would be a smart move by WB/DC, acknowledging this universe as part of the DCCU is a win-win for everyone involved.
 
T

TS-08

Member
RellyRell28 said:
1622609_519836548136298_170616852_n.jpg
Click to expand...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought she only started looking into Blood because of Roy and Sin's friend who had died. I remember they did some investigating about the blood drives and then brought it to Laurel's attention. I don't recall her having some brilliant moment of intuition on her own.
 
F

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Smart money says DC has no fucking idea about what to do with its cinematic universe, so they are throwing everything out there in hopes to see what sticks. I wouldn't get my hopes high if I were Amell.
 
J

Joni

Member
Funky Papa said:
Smart money says DC has no fucking idea about what to do with its cinematic universe, so they are throwing everything out there in hopes to see what sticks. I wouldn't get my hopes high if I were Amell.
Click to expand...
At one point they'll have to realize the guys behind Arrow/Flash are the only ones that have their shit together when it comes to DC live action stuff at the moment.
 
A

Anbokr

Bull on a Donut
ItsThatAsianBoy said:
Amell admits to having "studio level" talks about Justice League.

source: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=93273

Discussions are slower than we think.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't be surprised if they connect the film and TV universes, to be honest. Amell has been dropping these subtle hints in many interviews and on his twitter recently. Also, I think Geoff Johns (DC COO) has always been a fan of the TV stuff (even before Arrow with stuff like with Smallville), and Tom Welling was supposedly up for Clark Kent when Brett Ratner was attached to Superman Returns. And Arrow is leagues better than Smallville, and the critical response it's been receiving shows it, how many articles have we had from journalists comparing Arrow to SHIELD? DC can't be turning a blind eye to how acclaimed their TV show is compared to its Marvel counterpart.

The only question is once these TV actors get a taste of the big screen money and fame... what's to keep them on the CW lol? Why would Amell work for 100kish an Arrow episode when he could pocket millions from films (especially if his demand rises as a result of a JL film).

Anyhow guess this is all speculation and moot at this point.
 
Wiktor

Wiktor

Member
Joni said:
At one point they'll have to realize the guys behind Arrow/Flash are the only ones that have their shit together when it comes to DC live action stuff at the moment.
Click to expand...

I think DC might be getting their shit together pretty well, just not in the big tentpole category. Aside from Arrow/Flash I expect Constantine to be at least good and there's hope that Gotham might turn out good too. Plus DC is supposed to be making bunch of lower budgeted (like 30-40 mlns) movies about lesser known characters, which seems to make much more sense than trying to turn every IP into big budgeted spectacle.
 
S

SystemBug

Member
Joni said:
And the studio level discussion thing is fake apparantly.
Click to expand...

Yep amell is pissed - from his facebook

Something I need to get off of my chest.

When I do press, I try and be open, honest and thoughtful. That being said... I find it incredibly discouraging to see a headline like the ones I've been seeing this morning. Headlines that aren't just a stretch, they're totally fabricated. At no point, have I had "studio level" discussions about any feature films at Warner Bros.

In this particular instance, when I read articles that take a pretty straightforward answer and slap a title on it that has little to no correlation to what I've actually said, it makes it seem as though I'm disrespecting my current position. Which is bullshit. And why would I do that? I mean... I'm not the smartest dude in the world. (After all... I picked a career in acting.) But would I really just casually subvert a process cloaked in secrecy? A process - by the way - being run by the company who currently employs me. C'MON!

We're making a kick ass show. We will continue to make a kick ass show. And I will continue to interact and provide interesting content for our fans. Because I love our fans. If every once and a while, some dickweed wants to pull a headline out of thin air to generate page views, then that's the price we pay.
Click to expand...
 
B

BlackNMild2k1

Member
Anbokr said:
The only question is once these TV actors get a taste of the big screen money and fame... what's to keep them on the CW lol? Why would Amell work for 100kish an Arrow episode when he could pocket millions from films (especially if his demand rises as a result of a JL film).
Click to expand...

I'm guessing that's what a multi-season/multi-picture contract would be for.

gotta get those in place before fame inflates those egos.
 
J

Jest Chillin

Member
Isn't a steady TV gig considered more lucrative for an Actor though? I mean just because someone becomes a star in a movie doesn't mean they'll suddenly have the ability to make 20 million a picture from that point on. Meanwhile a steady TV slot means gauranteed cash per episode as long as the show is on the air and a lot of main characters seem to get production credit on their shows after so many years as well.
 
D

DaveH

Member
https://www.facebook.com/stephenamell/posts/567498826668722
Amell via Facebook said:
Something I need to get off of my chest.

When I do press, I try and be open, honest and thoughtful. That being said... I find it incredibly discouraging to see a headline like the ones I've been seeing this morning. Headlines that aren't just a stretch, they're totally fabricated. At no point, have I had "studio level" discussions about any feature films at Warner Bros.

In this particular instance, when I read articles that take a pretty straightforward answer and slap a title on it that has little to no correlation to what I've actually said, it makes it seem as though I'm disrespecting my current position. Which is bullshit. And why would I do that? I mean... I'm not the smartest dude in the world. (After all... I picked a career in acting.) But would I really just casually subvert a process cloaked in secrecy? A process - by the way - being run by the company who currently employs me. C'MON!

We're making a kick ass show. We will continue to make a kick ass show. And I will continue to interact and provide interesting content for our fans. Because I love our fans. If every once and a while, some dickweed wants to pull a headline out of thin air to generate page views, then that's the price we pay.
Click to expand...
 
V

Van Owen

Banned
Jest Chillin said:
Isn't a steady TV gig considered more lucrative for an Actor though? I mean just because someone becomes a star in a movie doesn't mean they'll suddenly have the ability to make 20 million a picture from that point on. Meanwhile a steady TV slot means gauranteed cash per episode as long as the show is on the air and a lot of main characters seem to get production credit on their shows after so many years as well.
Click to expand...

lol it's the CW.
 
V

Van Owen

Banned
Jest Chillin said:
Which is owned by CBS and Warner Bros. Being The CW means something when talking about demographics and ratings. It doesn't mean the actors don't get paid decent wages.
Click to expand...

How much do you expect actors to get paid on shows with mediocre ratings?

Shows on the major networks are much better off.
 
J

Jest Chillin

Member
Van Owen said:
How much do you expect actors to get paid on shows with mediocre ratings?

Shows on the major networks are much better off.
Click to expand...

Mediocre compared to Major Networks, but above average for The CW. They're not getting pennies on the dollar or actors wouldn't stick around.They're not reality show stars. A lot of The CW's shows also do well internationally. Guys like Jensen and Padelecki from Supernatural surely aren't making Friends cast money but I'm pretty positive they're not hurting in the least and that they're getting paid more now then they were in the first few seasons of Supernatural.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Army of Darkness (1993) and "The Long Night" from Game of Thrones are similar tales with stark differences.
0
960
Madflavor replied
LTTP : The Walking dead (all seasons/spoilers)
Spoilers
19
2K
Badlucktroll replied
Master Detective Archives: Rain Code |OT| Danganronpa Dungeon Crawling
|OT| Review
22
3K
Vampire On Titus replied
Lara Croft Crowned Most Iconic Video Games Character of All Time, According to BAFTA Poll
2 3 4 5
208
13K
ResurrectedContrarian replied
‘The Last of Us’ Season 2 Will Have ‘A Lot More Infected,’ Creators Address Complaints About Lack of Action
News 2 3
104
8K
Moochi replied
Top Bottom