Again, that has nothing to do with this topic.
Yes it does if you followed the conversation but I can see why you're brushing it aside after making things up about the cause of it. Read below as to why we're here.
Again, you're conflating government mandated sanctions with a publisher selling software in region(s) knowing full well that they'll be impacted in a few months after *THEIR OWN* change.
Says the guy who was posting China bans just yesterday. And MS requiring a MS account was their own change which resulted in those who had bought minecraft not being able to access minecraft and stopping them playing. For obvious reasons though you're having a really hard time conceding anything.
My only point was that "waiting for the next project" would have been an asnine reason to prevent cross progression work and PSN account requirements much like it would have been for MS and Minecraft because it's a live service game meant to be supported for years.
Unfortunately instead of maybe saying yeah I can see your point you said
"But that's not the same because, popularity, paid, blah blah blah"
I said it's exactly the same in almost every way and games were sold and subsequently made unplayable due to the requirement. You said give me an example, I said Iran. You said microsft accounts are supported in iran. I said no they aren't. You said but that's not MS fault why are you discussing whataboutisms' and here we are with the constant excuses from you. It's not about whataboutism. It's about the fact that your idea that they shouldn't have done it and waited for the next project is asnine and when I tried to convince you of that with your favourite executive you try and make excuses as to how retroactively adding accounts is somehow warranted there.