• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

As Trump's problems mount, Breitbart's numbers are cratering

johnsmith

remember me
A feel good story for today

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/breitbart-traffic-numbers-are-cratering?mbid=social_twitter

With its former chairman Steve Bannon as White House chief strategist and plans for an ambitious international expansion, Breitbart was supposed to be on its way to becoming a media behemoth in the Trump era, one with unparalleled access and a passionate audience. ”While several publishers have enjoyed an uptick in traffic due to election coverage, we are proud to have built a massive and deeply-rooted community that will remain long after the election cycle fades," Larry Solov, Breitbart's C.E.O., predicted back in November.

Early on, Solov's prediction seemed to be coming true. ”Breitbart News is the #45th most trafficked website in the United States, according to rankings from Amazon's analytics company, Alexa.com," they wrote on January 9, 2017. ”With over two billion pageviews generated in 2016 and 45 million unique monthly visitors, Breitbart News has now surpassed Fox News (#47), Huffington Post (#50), Washington Post (#53), and Buzzfeed (#64) in traffic." A month later, the site had even greater cause to celebrate. ”Breitbart News is now the 29th most trafficked site in the United States, surpassing PornHub and ESPN," they crowed. In the article, its staffers bragged that their bonkers traffic reflected the site's cementing a permanent place in American politics. ”The numbers speak for themselves," said Solov. (Many outlets, including The Hive, experienced traffic peaks around Trump's inauguration.)

Just a few months later, the numbers have a different story to tell. As of May 26, 2017, according to Alexa.com—the same web-ranking analytics company that Breitbart drew its numbers from in January—Fox News is the 64th most-trafficked site in the country. Huffington Post is at 60. Buzzfeed is at 50. The Washington Post, on the strength of a series of eye-popping scoops, is at 41.

Breitbart is in 281st place.

---

Other conservative media sites have also experienced declines in traffic in recent months, but none as pronounced as Breitbart's. According to Alexa data, National Review Online, *************, The Daily Caller, and Drudge Report all saw slumps in their rankings. Over the last week, as Trump was engulfed in the Comey scandal, Fox News's viewership dropped to third place behind CNN and MSNBC for the first time in 17 years.

--

Another factor could be an apparent decline in the number of times Breitbart stories receive a link from Matt Drudge—a single link on the Drudge Report homepage can fuel an entire month's worth of web traffic. Andrew Breitbart, a former Drudge employee, essentially built his organization on the back of the Drudge Report; Bannon continued the close relationship after Breitbart's death. (”Bannon used to go around bragging that he ran Drudge [and that] he could get a Drudge link anytime he wanted," said the former Breitbarter.) Many see the current editor, Alex Marlow, as having a more difficult time now that Bannon has gone. Says the former staffer, ”Alex's main strategy was to get Drudge links," while Bannon was there. ”When that's your training, it's hard to get away from that." (Drudge did not return a request for comment.)

Funny that Drudge and Breitbart/Bannon seem to be Feuding right now, as Drudge seems to be more pro-Kushner. A recent headline.

CPLETVh.jpg


http://mailchi.mp/cnn/reliable-june-1-273401
LoEvsEH.jpg


https://digiday.com/media/breitbart...0-percent-three-months-trumps-troubles-mount/

Six months ago, Breitbart was riding the wave of the election, plotting an international expansion to provide a platform to spread far-right, populist views in Europe. But today, Breitbart is facing traffic declines, advertiser blacklists, campaigns for marketers to steer clear and even a petition within Amazon for it to stop providing ad services.

There were just 26 brands appearing on Breitbart in May, down from a high of 242 in March, according to MediaRadar, which tracks ads on websites. Many conservative sites, including Townhall, The Blaze and National Review, have also had declines, although those declines are much less pronounced than Breitbart, according to MediaRadar.

Donald Trump winning is the worst thing that could have happened to conservative media. Can you imagine Fox News's ratings right now if Hillary Clinton had won, and Chaffetz was investigating to his heart's content.
 

Nafai1123

Banned
That's what happens when Russia-bots stop spamming the shit out of your fake bullshit articles to target susceptible stupid people.
 

BatDan

Bane? Get them on board, I'll call it in.
Drudge and Brietbart are feuding? My god it's a war of the cucks!

Much like Fox News' declining ratings, this shows why complete Republican control actually hurts them. They no longer have a scapegoat, and all the deflection tactics are failing.
 

MUnited83

For you.
No motherfucking shit, the whole "success" of Breitbart was Russian bots spamming the hell out of their articles day and night on Twitter and Facebook to influence the election. Russia got what they wanted, and Breitbart is going down.
 
And this is why I'm not worried about the GOP's strategy of going in hard on the anti-media stance. Breitbart is cratering. Fox News is dipping in ratings. Less and Less people are willing to fall for the far-right's bullshit.
 
Caution

If you look at the alexa graph there was a ranking bug that temporarily had them at a very low rank before the popped back to the top 100 somewhere.

However ignoring that they are ranking lower and advertisers are hard to find. They are basically a money losing PR site for trump run by Mercers cash.
 

Shoeless

Member
And this is why I'm not worried about the GOP's strategy of going in hard on the anti-media stance. Breitbart is cratering. Fox News is dipping in ratings. Less and Less people are willing to fall for the far-right's bullshit.

I don't know if it's actually people less gullible, or these newsites having less to cover now that there's no Democrat controlled administration to attack on a daily basis. Since they can't actually cover negative stories about a Republican controlled government, this means there are huge gaps in their ability to tell stories compared to news outlets that don't actually have that handicap.

Fox can't report on Trump or his cabinet imploding, and instead they have to run a story about "the dilemma of BBQ sauce in Texas" while every other paper or TV station is talking about the White House being metaphorically on fire.

Even if you're a die-hard Trump supporter, the BBQ in Texas story is less interesting to watch than "the enemy" putting out more rage-inducing "Fake News" that attacks your boy. By pretending that stuff isn't happening, Republican focused news media simply has less material to work with, and subsequently is passing up on drama that their viewer/readership would follow.
 

Gutek

Member
I love how the right wing media is imploding once the right wing holds all the power in this country. They only run on opposition.
 
And this is why I'm not worried about the GOP's strategy of going in hard on the anti-media stance. Breitbart is cratering. Fox News is dipping in ratings. Less and Less people are willing to fall for the far-right's bullshit.

Pollster Nate Silver made this point that saying that trumps base is energized by crazy shit is not actually a good thing for his support.
He didn't win based on he hardcore 25% he won with the votes of center "give him a go" people and they are getting turned off in droves.
The more excited his base becomes the smaller his overall support as an overall percentage gets.
 

CHC

Member
That's what happens when Russia-bots stop spamming the shit out of your fake bullshit articles to target susceptible stupid people.

At the risk of sounding like a loon, this is kind of my take away as well. I mean, I know there's a lot of right wing nut jobs out there, but I have always been suspicious of just how active Breitbart appeared to be.
 
I am curious to see what trajectory Fake News leads to. It's hard to see many people hanging on once it becomes clear Trump won't be making the country into the land of Milk, Honey and Gaudy Interior Decorating.

Diehard fans will stick around, and the usual scapegoats will be paraded around, but I wonder how these news sites look at the end of Trump's term. It's an interesting time to say the least.
 
I don't know if it's actually people less gullible, or these newsites having less to cover now that there's no Democrat controlled administration to attack on a daily basis. Since they can't actually cover negative stories about a Republican controlled government, this means there are huge gaps in their ability to tell stories compared to news outlets that don't actually have that handicap.

Fox can't report on Trump or his cabinet imploding, and instead they have to run a story about "the dilemma of BBQ sauce in Texas" while every other paper or TV station is talking about the White House being metaphorically on fire.

Even if you're a die-hard Trump supporter, the BBQ in Texas story is less interesting to watch than "the enemy" putting out more rage-inducing "Fake News" that attacks your boy. By pretending that stuff isn't happening, Republican focused news media simply has less material to work with, and subsequently is passing up on drama that their viewer/readership would follow.

I'm sure that's a factor too, but anecdotally I have seen this shit with suburban conservatives I know that used to watch Fox News all the damn time.

But post Trump, they pretty much avoid watching Fox News because Fox News has lost all of its best bullshit artists and just keeps desperately defending someone that these suburban conservatives don't even like.
 

Savitar

Member
Let them burn, they are nothing but a disease on the human race. The same shit that causes people to act violent in other parts of the world, this is how it begins with types like them.
 

Shoeless

Member
I'm sure that's a factor too, but anecdotally I have seen this shit with suburban conservatives I know that used to watch Fox News all the damn time.

But post Trump, they pretty much avoid watching Fox News because Fox News has lost all of its best bullshit artists and just keeps desperately defending someone that these suburban conservatives don't even like.

I actually find this observation of yours to be a little hopeful. Maybe the US isn't lost after all, if people can eventually wise up like that.
 
And this is why I'm not worried about the GOP's strategy of going in hard on the anti-media stance. Breitbart is cratering. Fox News is dipping in ratings. Less and Less people are willing to fall for the far-right's bullshit.

Stannisfewer.gif

But yea, if we can take one positive in the sea of negatives from trumps win its the failing of far right media.
 
Kinda makes you think that a lot of Trump's base was more so just anti-Obama, anti-Clinton than they necessarily were Pro-Trump, so when the Obama and Clinton news mostly dries up -- despite desperate attempts from Breitbart, et al, -- they lose some of their daily readers.
 

Nafai1123

Banned
At the risk of sounding like a loon, this is kind of my take away as well. I mean, I know there's a lot of right wing nut jobs out there, but I have always been suspicious of just how active Breitbart appeared to be.

It's not even loony. The IC has been telling us this for awhile.

Russia releases hacked emails through Wikileaks
Sites like Brietbart "weaponize" the emails by coming up with fake news extrapolations from emails
Russian social media bots spam those articles, specifically targeting those who are susceptible to fake news
This then drives people to those sites to read the articles

It makes perfect sense that without those bots driving clicks, their numbers would go down drastically.
 

Cipherr

Member
Need more Presidents of color with immaculate diction and endless charisma for their base to hate all the goddamned day if they want those numbers back
KuGsj.gif


Fuck'em.
 
Steve-Bannon.jpg


This is the greatest picture ever.

It's like he feels his organs shutting down and is trying to come to terms with it.

Does he always look this unhealthy? I could have sworn I saw pictures of him before where the rot in his soul wasn't visible on his face
 

Averon

Member
Don't conservative usually slump when the GOP is in power? Conservative media thrives on their viewers being angry and pissed off at Washington and liberals.

It is pretty hard to get angry when your guys are in power and you have no easy liberal boogeyman to direct anger at (Hilary Clinton). Of course, Trump incompetence doesn't help at all.
 
It's like he feels his organs shutting down and is trying to come to terms with it.

Does he always look this unhealthy? I could have sworn I saw pictures of him before where the rot in his soul wasn't visible on his face

Let me put it this way:

Bannon joined Trump's campaign because he was hoping to lead the efforts in starting Trump TV after Trump was expected to lose.

Instead what happened is Bannon ends up having to actually work at the work White House and....become....establishment..... (think about how much that kills Bannon on the inside)

And the worst part is that Bannon at first figured that he could just wage war on the free press like a fascist dictator, but that plan has not only backfired but then all of a sudden Trump's (((Globalist))) "cuck" Son in Law swoops in to become more influential about decisions than Bannon, which leads Bannon to go to the same free press he called "the enemy" to leak some White House stories against Kushner.

Think about how much all that must fucking kill Bannon on the inside.
 
Top Bottom