Psychological Intellect
Banned
holy fuck
holy fuck
Disgusting.
Besides, surely the terrorist groups understand that if the POTUS was hit/hurt/killed, there would be hell to pay from the US, whereas who will seek revenge against the killing of these students?
Are you implying that terrorists are rational thinkers?It's not going to be the same.
The kind of security our President will have is nothing compared to what these poor people had. In the world, some lives are considered more important than others, sadly :/
Besides, surely the terrorist groups understand that if the POTUS was hit/hurt/killed, there would be hell to pay from the US, whereas who will seek revenge against the killing of these students?
It has nothing to do with oil.Boko Haram, al shabab, etc, why does no one care about these groups?
Is it really the oil thing?
Reset the sign to "0 days since Islamic terrorists last murdered a group of innocent civilians"
All 147 are Christian I believe. They separated Muslims from the Christians and let Muslims go when the attack occurred.
All 147 are Christian I believe. They separated Muslims from the Christians and let Muslims go when the attack occurred.
I guess it ultimately depends on the group's goal as you've said. If they're looking for destabilization attacking any president is just another fucked up strategy of theirs. They thrive on driving whoever they can into conflict.Depends on how you define rational.
Strategic, perhaps. I don't think they run around killing whoever they want for fun. I'm sure there's reason behind it-- western education is bad, keeping a population in terror and easier to control, etc.
I would also think that a successful terrorist group would be able to plan attacks understanding what they might get in return, especially one that's been terrorizing Kenya for as long as it has.
Ugh that's sickening.
Sadly yesLoss of words from me.
Is that considered genocide?
Last time they did that (the shopping centre attack) but still ended up killing a pregnant Turkish woman. Probably thought she was non-Muslim since she was White.All 147 are Christian I believe. They separated Muslims from the Christians and let Muslims go when the attack occurred.
Reset the sign to "0 days since Islamic terrorists last murdered a group of innocent civilians"
Sadly yes
List of battles and other violent events by death toll:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...iolent_events_by_death_toll#Terrorist_attacks
Sort terrorist attack column by ideology. It's pretty freaky!
List of battles and other violent events by death toll:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...iolent_events_by_death_toll#Terrorist_attacks
Sort terrorist attack column by ideology. It's pretty freaky!
List of battles and other violent events by death toll:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...iolent_events_by_death_toll#Terrorist_attacks
Sort terrorist attack column by ideology. It's pretty freaky!
Shocking!
So what are we concluding here? That Islam and Muslims as a whole are at fault for Saudi Arabia's desert oil fueled nonsense ideology called Wahabbism?
Why doesn't greater Islam turn en masse against SA, anyways? I mean, SA have control over major holy sites; surely this is an affront to the majority of Muslim people? I'm asking.
Military intervention in a foreign country isn't always a stabilizing force and the Kenyans who have to bear the brunt of the conflict may not take kindly to all the destruction. The fuse that would set off such a response from the US doesn't have to be a single person. Al Qaeda knew that very well and afaik they still exist as a group. When you mentioned strategy earlier I agreed that not all terrorist groups would be looking towards the same goal. Some might be fine with putting themselves at risk if it means more join their cause.But the POTUS' death wouldn't cause destabilization.
It would just provoke incredible retaliation, one which they're not equipped for.
A dead POTUS? Even if other countries didn't help, I can't imagine they would step in to stop the US from wrecking vengeance, especially in Kenya.
Just awful.
Ehh. Put American Slavery on the list--and why wouldn't you?--and it shatters the whole thing. How is the Holocaust *not* terrorism? Action by Mexican or Colombian drug cartels aren't on that list at all. "Terrorism" is a word we generally apply to violence carried out by state-less Jihadists.
I dunno. What do you think I should take away from that list?
You should probably sort by date. How you interpret or what you choose to take away from the information presented is up to you.
You should probably sort by date. How you interpret or what you choose to take away from the information presented is up to you.
I'm saying I don't even know that that list represents "information". It's such a clear coding issue. Does the North Korean regime "count" as terrorism? Probably should. But then deaths attributable to the regime are more spread out / continuous than the more easily-bucket-ed "attacks" on that list.
I'm asking what you think that list represents. You seem to think its self-evident. Why even distinguish Jihadist violence from war violence? Why put Irish republican violence on the same list? They all have different remedies, the character of the victims and the character of the agents is different in all three of those general categories.
As for my take? Holy shit there has been a lot of terrorist attacks attributed to Jihadism in the past decade. I would assume most people would look at that list and be shocked in some way. You weren't?
Its a fucking university.
Why would you kill kids who are trying to learn?
God the ignorance