spending $100m+ to ensure you'll never win the next election is 15th dimensional golden chess
And the living soul is officially off to the High Court. PHON decided to move the motion themselves as soon as it was clear the Greens/Labor/NXT/Crossbench had the numbers anyways.
You don't understand
Turnbull wants to be PM longer than Abbott was and any price is fine to make that happen
The Conservatives want to delay marriage equality as long as possible , preferably into the next Government if not longer and weaken Turnbull's leadership and any price is fine.
No one cares about winning the next election or enormous fecking wastes of taxpayer money.
The thing is Turnbull absolutely thinks he can turn things around with things like the budget and horseshit "pragmatic" ideas like this. It won't but he's comfortable deluding himself that it will.
Is he? Or has he finally realised that's all he can do and stay Liberal leader.
He's trying to steer back to the "sensible centre" (kill me) and placating the right wing flank in the process by giving them the postal plebiscite, the National's corrupt water dealings, and Dutton's fascist power grab. It'll convince the bougie Fairfax/AFR types that love to obsess every Tuesday over last nights Q&A but it won't work on the rest as they've already tuned out & decided to vote for the ALP, Greens, NXT, or Pauline's latest scam.
Turnbull being dragged onto the steps of parliament and eaten by Nationals is only worthwhile if they put a powdered wig on him first.He deserves to be eaten by his own party. Hell, they could literally eat him and I wouldn't care.
says many Australians are alarmed that the institution of marriage is being tampered with which could lead to polygamy.Bronwyn Bishop
The institution of marriage, that is a thousand years old, is being tampered with. And if it can be changed from having a man and a woman to any two people why not three, as it is in Colombia, thetold Sky News.former speaker
went on to say that many voters were troubled by the arguments of progressives. Youve got Professor Peter Singer, who believes that children if they are disabled should be put to death at birth. And also if there is sex between humans and animals, that is fine as long as they are both satisfied.She
People are suspicious of the so-called progressive movement and at the end of the day the Australian people get it right. The Australian people should be trusted.
So should we vote or boycott?
I'm going to vote Yes unless there's a clear and well-organised move by the effected groups to boycott. Can't see any reason to do otherwise.
I'm going to vote Yes unless there's a clear and well-organised move by the effected groups to boycott. Can't see any reason to do otherwise.
Postal vote is a win win for no.
If they win they claim a mandate.
If the lose they claim the inherent unrepresentative nature of the postal plebiscite (which they designed) means the results mean nothing.
That 2nd bit would be hard to argue from their position. The whole postal plebiscite thing is structurally biased in favor of the No case (demographics with stronger No percentages are more likely to participate, the way the outcome is treated (No is binding, Yes isn't.) in far more places than Yes (actually I can't think of anywhere it's structurally biased in favor of Yes beyond that we already know Yes is a majority of the population ).
I mean, do we think so little of our fellow Australians and our ability to debate important matters of public interest that we say: 'You're not able to have a respectful discussion about the definition of marriage', which is a very significant, important, fundamental element in our law and in our culture.
- Malcolm Turbull
Respectful discussion part 1
I mean, do we think so little of our fellow Australians and our ability to debate important matters of public interest that we say: 'You're not able to have a respectful discussion about the definition of marriage', which is a very significant, important, fundamental element in our law and culture
They'll just blame ballot stuffing and GetUp justifying it as a reason to kick the can down the road. Maybe they'll blame Turnbull too for letting it happen.
.
I'm waiting for Getup! to become the right wing bogeyman, can't be to long now till someone goes on the Bolt Show and claims Getup! are unfairly skewing the result.
Even the government have given up on calling it a plebiscite, it's now a survey.
The ACL comparing children of same sex couples to the stolen generation of indigenous aborigines is vile.
This plebiscite is the pits and I'm not looking forward to the smear campaign against the LGBTQIA community that's already starting.
That's probably smart. With a High Court challenge announced its probably best to say it is a survey since a plebiscite would need Parliamentary approval.
I'm gay but currently in London. Am I allowed to vote in the marriage poll?
The ACL comparing children of same sex couples to the stolen generation of indigenous aborigines is vile.
Do you have to register if you're already on the electoral roll?
Okay, I'm ready to vote in this dumb poll.No, but go here to check. https://check.aec.gov.au/
Brandis confirmed to us (Community Legal Centre Conference) that he will be campaigning for yes.
Dreyfus let slip that he thinks the High Court case is about a 50/50 prospect of success.
#hotscoops
If the High Court knocks it down I can't even imagine what chaos ensues.
Silent electors, people like politicians and others that don't want their details to appear on the public roll may not be able to take part in the survey!
The AEC is forbidden from sharing the silent electors details with the ABS. If this isn't a sign of just how half-arsed the process is...
Just watching Australian news and holy shit does this postal plebiscite seem like bullshit that makes the Brexit referendum seem rational and well planned.
According to todays media for the sake of peace the ranks Coalition cabinet members will not be campaigning outside their electorates on SSM , whether they are personally For or Against.
(Best argument I've ever heard for putting Abbott back in the Cabinet)
And not in the good way either.Make no mistake, until Novemeber/December nothing else will penetrate the media other than SSM.
So we're going to see 3 months of Shorten vs. Abbott with Turnbull having left the field, I can't believe the people at Lib HQ think this is a solid strategy. When it's all over no one is going to take Turnbull seriously as a leader if they even do now. Make no mistake, until Novemeber/December nothing else will penetrate the media other than SSM.
So we're going to see 3 months of Shorten vs. Abbott with Turnbull having left the field, I can't believe the people at Lib HQ think this is a solid strategy. When it's all over no one is going to take Turnbull seriously as a leader if they even do now. Make no mistake, until Novemeber/December nothing else will penetrate the media other than SSM.