ShadyAcshuns
Member
I usually play as an elf in these kinds of games.
So true, only news im disappointed by is the game is made up of zones instead of being freeroam which is no biggie but it sucked ass in outerworlds so hopefully they have learnt something from that gameHurry, everyone pretend to be super upset by this news!
Cool. Then i hope they're happy with me also shaving off some of the compensation so I can focus my money elsewhere.If you read the article they're extremely honest why they chose this. They basically don't want to waste resources on setting up 4 different tiers of camera perspective, hit detection and enemy AI for attacking and spend development resources to make that all look right. They're prioritizing other things.
In a old school low budget CRPG its much easier to just make a sprite and then that's the end of it really. Not much else changes.
Only thing that disappoints me about any of this is the fact that this was supposed to be Obisidian's take on Skyrim. Not sure if that comparison was ever really accurate or if some in the media made that up themselves. Either way, that was the expectation and this game is light years from that. So.....fine. Time to scale back my expectations and look at this game with a clean slate.
Is the game not coming to PC? Or being concerned about that automatically makes you an xbox concern troll?Karen's of the gaming world unite.
If I had a magic genie lamp my 3 wishes would be
1)bring back Steve Irwin
2)country music is illegal
3)send a giant meteor in to the living rooms of these xbox concern trolls
I guess, but I don't necessarily mind an intentionally limited scope, especially if it gets the game out faster. Been waiting for a new Elder Scrolls forever, and I bet when it does come out it will have all the races and romance options that are missing from Avowed, but it will all be so generalized and safe that they'll basically feel the same anyway.It's getting laughable at this point. I guarantee this is because they are being rushed to get this out the door.
They themselves distanced from Skyrim comparisons a while ago by name, so if anyone was still doing that, it's on them
Nah....Obsidian has some responsibility here as this game has been all over the place from the start.
Cool. Then i hope they're happy with me also shaving off some of the compensation so I can focus my money elsewhere.
Keep eating shit and your overlord will keep serving it.Everybody is perfectly fine if you don’t buy or play the game, tbh.
Keep eating shit and your overlord will keep serving it.
Oh look at me i have black friends so i cant be racist.Their last game landed at 87 MC and nothing I’ve seen from Avowed has me worried or concerned.
You can try posting the review you read from the future where it was judged as ‘shit’
Good thing I own every gaming platform known to man, so I curate on quality. But you tried
Oh look at me i have black friends so i cant be racist.
You do you man. Ill vote with my wallet, sorry that bothers you.
I don’t see how they do. Things change during development and they communicated that change nearly a year ago.
I mean, this just seems like the good planning/management people keep demanding from XGS. They’re playing to their strengths. And it’s not a new concept that scope gets finalized during pre-production.
So whats your issue then? If you agree with my stance why are you so defensive that i stated that?Everybody votes with their wallets when review scores show up. Take Redfall, for example.
Hey demigod
So whats your issue then? If you agree with my stance why are you so defensive that i stated that?
They keep cutting or not including content that is expected and you think it will review well off the hot releases of games like BG3?
Answer these simple questions.
Everything else being equal, would it be better if the game had 2 races or would it be better if it had 6?
Why?
Can a game with a good MC score still be shit?
From the reveal trailer I had high hopes of it being a skyrim dungeon thingy. But from the trailer it's not :?
The player in Avowed is a representative from the Aedyr Empire, which is predominantly made up of humans and elves."
That sounds racist to me. The Aedyr Empire is predominantly human/elf, but that doesn't mean there isn't a single dwarf living there.
I expected better form Obsidian in 2024.
This was always going to happen. People can ruin another game for themselves if they want. I'll most likely end up enjoying it. Their loss. Nothing can really stop people from ruining a game for themselves if they really want to.I feel like this game is poised to disappoint a ton of people at little fault of the devs. They aren't trying to make something on the level as BG3 or Elder Scrolls and seem to have been pretty clear about that, but people are still setting themselves up to get really angry about it.
Oh, I thought only low standards and delusion mattered here.Shhhh. That’s not how things work around here!
Well, if people created a thread for every single thing a game does not feature for every game, and not just Avowed, there would be no space for discussion for anything else.lmao, man
someone post a compilation of stuff that Avowed straight up doesn't have. Wasn't there recently news that it doesn't feature romance as well?
Yikes.With each new statements that comes up, it seems like this is not going to be a deep RPG game at all.
- Avowed won't have romance options.
- Avowed won't have classes.
- Avowed won't allow a pacifist run.
- Avowed won't have a companion approval syst
Nothing of nothing
To be honest, after seeing last night's showcase all these games looked better to me. Not better than sonys showcase I mean it makes the graphics look better if that makes sense. Better than they may have originally looked after first viewing. I went back and reaatched all the trailers and avowed is easily up their with what the industry is putting out in general.
I don't think there's any stand out games on these consoles for anything gameplay wise and graphically everything looked on par with each other.
Just my opinion but avowed actually looks better after yesterday's playstation event. I never thought it looked bad but now it definitely is up there with the beat looking games (outside of death stranding 2 and hellblade)
Indy looks down right amazing.
I think thats a little harsh and conveniant thing to say as we already know Hellblade will be a shorter game like the orig game, the devs themselves said it.I'm telling you right now, again, read the tea leaves.
Avowed will be a very small scale game. Small game world, small number of choices, races, character classes, enemy variety, the list goes on.
So will Indiana Jones, so will Senuas
Sacrifice.
The reason is that Microsoft is in panic mode because they have no games. So the games that they do have in development are being scaled back to release sooner.
I have no clue what their future strategy is. I don't really understand many of the decisions they have made. Add a lifelong fan, it hurts.
Because 99% of people form their opinion of the product on the version released on Day 1 (or week 1 at most).Why would they include more races when they can add them later in season passes or expansions?