I bought BG1 EE, the new expansion, and BG2 EE last night. It's been years since I played 2 and I never played 1. Excited but I have one question - are there any absolutely essential mods for either game or should I play them as they are?
Only when one has installed the expansion, or generally for the v2.0 update? And can you also install those two mods after having started the game or is a new game required?Sadly mods are all borked with SoD right now so you'll have to play vanilla.
Only when one has installed the expansion, or generally for the v2.0 update? And can you also install those two mods after having started the game or is a new game required?
The XP cap goes up to 500k, which is level 9-12 depending on class.
If you start a new game in SoD you begin with about 70k xp (about level 7) and your characters are decked out. Basically all the best gear from BG1. That might be a more interesting spot for you.
Is there any Ipad version?
They said that the iOS and Android versions should be out in 5-6 weeks.
Wtf where do you live? That is almost what I pay for 200/200mb here in Sweden.
Are posts/thread discussing Gamergate content still allowed? Couldn't find anything on that in the FAQ section.
Anyway, some people are currently going nuts because some of the Beamdog "SJW content" included with the new expansion: https://www.gog.com/forum/baldurs_g...g_games_do_not_buy_siege_of_dragonspear/page1
You'll find similar threads in the Steam Community, the review sections on GOG and Steam are currently being bombed by gamergaters.
This is ridiculous...
I guess it is nice for homophobic people that they can now hide their blatant bigotry behind vaguely defined political activism. Must be liberating.Anyway, some people are currently going nuts because some of the Beamdog "SJW content" included with the new expansion: https://www.gog.com/forum/baldurs_g...g_games_do_not_buy_siege_of_dragonspear/page1.
If there was something for the original Baldurs Gate that just doesnt mesh for modern day gamers like the sexism, [we tried to address that], said writer Amber Scott. In the original theres a lot of jokes at womens expense. Or if not a lot, theres a couple, like Safana was just a sex object in BG 1, and Jaheira was the nagging wife and that was played for comedy. We were able to say, No, thats not really the kind of story we want to make. In Siege of Dragonspear, Safana gets her own little storyline, she got a way better personality upgrade. If people dont like that, then too bad.
I don't mind developers taking a stand, so to say, but I would prefer it if they didn't actually add any of that stuff to the game itself.
Like that audiofile of Minsc going "Really it's all about ethics... in heroic adventuring", that seems like an obvious gamergate reference within the game itself.
I agree that is pretty dumb line, but I'm not sure if it is even in the game. I'm probably half way through SoD and had Minsc in my party the whole time and haven't seen that line at least.
I would guess that it's way for the developers to simply get it out the system; I know that at least a couple of the developers working on the game have suffered greatly from attacks on themselves and their gender/sexual orientation so it might also be a healthy way to voice their opinions. Though I do agree, that sort of breaking the 4th wall doesn't always suit the game so well (but as mentioned above, I don't believe they actually ever put any of it into the game).I don't mind developers taking a stand, so to say, but I would prefer it if they didn't actually add any of that stuff to the game itself.
Like that audiofile of Minsc going "Really it's all about ethics... in heroic adventuring", that seems like an obvious gamergate reference within the game itself.
That's a relief to hear, atleast. These games are all about immersion into the world for me and cultural references like that make me salty.
I would guess that it's way for the developers to simply get it out the system; I know that at least a couple of the developers working on the game have suffered greatly from attacks on themselves and their gender/sexual orientation so it might also be a healthy way to voice their opinions. Though I do agree, that sort of breaking the 4th wall doesn't always suit the game so well (but as mentioned above, I don't believe they actually ever put any of it into the game).
I agree, though I do believe that's what they have mainly sticked with (hiding the most over references from the game)...I think something like optional developer commentary or a silly option like Wild Wasteland used in Fallout work as a nice compromise between making a statement and not breaking the 4th wall in these cases.
...though the game and most of it's counterparts have relied on many cultural references and easter eggs that don't necessarily fit the overarching narrative and I guess the new one will also feature some, that are up to date (though I have not played the end product and most of knowledge comes from following the project).I'm thankful that developers do make a statement although I must admit I would have preferred if they tried to mimic the tone and style of the rest of the games rather then fix it. That said not seen anything overly bad from the screenshots floating around that annoyed me so far.
I think something like optional developer commentary or a silly option like Wild Wasteland used in Fallout work as a nice compromise between making a statement and not breaking the 4th wall in these cases.
I'm thankful that developers do make a statement although I must admit I would have preferred if they tried to mimic the tone and style of the rest of the games rather then fix it. That said not seen anything overly bad from the screenshots floating around that annoyed me so far.
The gaters do the same thing with every Bioware game too for daring to represent more diverse characters in their games. I'm sure the Codex is at arms too. It's disgusting.Are posts/thread discussing Gamergate content still allowed? Couldn't find anything on that in the FAQ section.
Anyway, some people are currently going nuts because some of the Beamdog "SJW content" included with the new expansion: https://www.gog.com/forum/baldurs_g...g_games_do_not_buy_siege_of_dragonspear/page1
You'll find similar threads in the Steam Community, the review sections on GOG and Steam are currently being bombed by gamergaters.
This is ridiculous...
That's a relief to hear, atleast. These games are all about immersion into the world for me and cultural references like that make me salty.
Anyway, is anybody here playing Dragonspear and is it good?
I think I'm gonna make myself finish the Pillars playthrough i started when the expansion came out before I hop on this. I know I'm going to want to do a whole big trilogy-style playthrough of the whole series, as I've never done that before.
Must never have played BG1 then. Cultural references are rampant (Chia pet, Madonna, etc).
It all makes me wonder what happens in the course of a 20 year old guy's life that turns them into some analog of the angry old man that's furious the "good old days" are being taken away from them. I just don't get how that delusional point of view infects the youth.Boy, Beamdog sure opened a can of worms with this one. One LGTB character is the end of world, apperently. And then they wonder why people don't take them seriously.
Fuck I lost my EE saves. I'm assuming there's an editing tool for this right?
Thanks.EE Keeper is your go to.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/eekeeper/
It all makes me wonder what happens in the course of a 20 year old guy's life that turns them into some analog of the angry old man that's furious the "good old days" are being taken away from them. I just don't get how that delusional point of view infects the youth.
Lol, I can see why people are upset. That quote's bullshit. Safana's no less thin than 95% of the BG1 NPCs. And that stuff about Jaheira is bafflingly false. And claiming Baldurs Gate is sexist...what a fucking clown. I love the series, but I'll pass on new content being created by writers like that.Apparently it was this quote from a Kotaku article that got the idiots angry.
It is interesting though, games these days are seen as politically relevant. That idea, 20 years ago when BG1 came out, would have been ridiculous. These days, people on the right and left really care about having (or not having) certain elements in games. I wonder if these "gamergaters" realize that what they are doing here, bringing this up in a 30 hour game, where it is such a minor element, is much more political than a writer saying line about it in some Kotaku interview.I can't believe I lived to see the day a new expansion for Baldur's Gate came out with the original cast, and that it is causing cultural/sexual controversy. We live in strange times...