strangest thing about TheExodu5 votes are, asides from forming a bandwagon so suddenly (despite no one voting for him earlier iirc), that some of the posters haven't really justified him from other inactive no lynches. It feels like some of you guys saw that people were town reading Retroid based on past behavior, and decided
If you're actively not trying to be part of the solution, you're part of the problem. That's not town behavior.
Vote: TheExodu5
Yes, because scum never tries to blend and make safe posts, right.... Nice one liner though.
I don't want voting for someone who might just be stubborn/frustrated townie because they don't contribute as much. I want voting for people you think are SCUM. Do you think all the inactoves or no lynch voters are SCUM?
I voted Exodu5 because he has been scummy from the beginning and I've had suspicions ever since the game started. His posts don't have much meat in them which can also apply to Absolut, but the difference between him and Absolut is their behavior. His last post kind of sealed the deal for me; he's intentionally removed from the discussion which does not make sense. Of course, Absolut could be doing the same thing, but we don't know for sure. It's kind of a gut read in general but id rather take my chances on someone with evidence to suggest they're scum as opposed to someone who has only given me bad vibes.
his last post was him re-entering the discussion, or did you not read the part about him not being willing to just let himself get bandwagonned
Why are you so important that multiple scum would try to lynch you on D1, Exodu5?
VOTE: TheExodu5
what, and scum doesn't have tihe easiest time ever voting for an inactive? Especially one, that up until that post, seemed like they weren't going to do much to defend themselves
Vote: AbsolutBro
am happy to consolidate onto TheExodu5 and MattyG.
already posted why your "choices" were bullshit
If Retroid is not happening, my alternatives would be Exodu5, AbsolutBro and MattyG, in that order.
VOTE: TheExodu5
asides from this seemingly being a bandwagon vote, I need to see if you had made specific reasons before hand
vote:Exodu5
I feel bad about how inactive I've been. Busier weekend than I suspected. But I didn't want to have the day end without voting-- not fair to not put myself out there.
I think no lunch has been sufficiently on the table to introduce tension to day 1-- people appear to be voting on suspicion rather than policy or inertia.
I see it's a tie now and I don't want AB to be lynched. He is not suspicious to me. Just inactive. Exodu5 I'm not highly suspicious of either but I can see good arguments out there. Wish I had time to go through the thread more but must put something out there in the next hour!
Gonna give you the hour to go through both of their posts, as I said, but this is just a classic case of an inactive arriving to the thread late and wanting to make a meaningful vote. And because of this excuse, I get nothing to look into out of it