*facepalm*Funding for the project was initially sluggish, but things changed when Ham debated Bill Nye the Science Guy in 2014. The resulting exposure resulted in a sizable surge in donations for the ark park, including a local bond issuance that channeled tens of millions of dollars into the effort. (Later, Nye would say he was heartbroken and sickened by the turn of events).
Wait, what the fuck is this?In another boost, a federal judge recently said the religious project could receive sales tax incentives worth up to $18 million, so long as strict religious tests were administered to employees. Critics say the judges decision is a violation of separation of church and state.
waste of space, time and money.
wait.. why were they on the Ark then?
and to stand as a proof that the stories in the Bible are true.
*facepalm*
Wait, what the fuck is this?
Why the FUCK didn't Aronofsky base his film on this!?
This might be the best thing I've ever seen.
Also this bit is hilarious:The tax break initially was approved by the Kentucky Tourism Development Finance Authority in 2014 under Gov. Steve Beshears administration, but it was later canceled after tourism officials learned that the theme park would hire only Christians. Bob Stewart, then secretary of the Tourism, Arts and Heritage Cabinet, said the U.S. Constitution prohibited the state from assisting a religious endeavor.
Ark Encounter officials sued the state in federal court, saying the states decision to withhold the tax break violated its free speech. In January, U.S. District Judge Greg Van Tatenhove ruled that the theme park was eligible to receive the tax incentive, which has neutral requirements that can be met by religious and secular groups alike. Gov. Matt Bevin said the state would not appeal the decision.
The tax break allows approved tourism sites to recover as much as 25 percent of their investment through a rebate of state sales taxes paid by visitors.
Ken Ham, president of Answers in Genesis, has said previously the project will hire only Christians but wont discriminate among denominations.
The book is surprisingly well done from an art point of view, it's quite the little treasure:
I think that real life Ark needs more dinosaurs on it!
Adam and steve?Adam and Eve isn't meant to be taken literally now?
In my Primary School it was taught in assembly as being pretty damn literal.
What is the non-literal version of Adam and Eve?
In January, U.S. District Judge Greg Van Tatenhove ruled that the theme park was eligible to receive the tax incentive, which has neutral requirements that can be met by religious and secular groups alike.
Also this bit is hilarious:
Yo what if they actually build a Tower of Babel and then get smote.
god said:1.Now the whole world had one language and a common speech. As people moved eastward, they found a plain in Shinar and settled there.
2.They said to each other, Come, lets make bricks and bake them thoroughly. They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar.
3 And they said, Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.
4 But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built.
5 And the Lord said, Indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them.
6 Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one anothers speech.
7 So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city.
8 Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.
I'd always assumed the tower of babel was "god smote fools for being arrogant and/or sinning" kind of thing, but I checked out the wikipedia article:
so people were getting along/accomplishing too much, so god fucked with them? Am I reading this correctly?
The Christian bible and the Catholic bible have some small but significant differences. As a kid who went to catholic school all through high school I can 100% confirm we were never told to take the bible verbatim word for word literally. Otherwise reading the book of the Apocalypse could make a man go mad.
I knew from an early age Adam and Eve were a story made up to explain creation, not to be taken as a history class. And shit like evolution or global warming was never even for a second doubted.
And yes. The Catholic Pope would disagree with you.
...actualy thinking about this church ....
MAYBE we are on "theme park" levels =P
I'd always assumed the tower of babel was "god smote fools for being arrogant and/or sinning" kind of thing, but I checked out the wikipedia article:
so people were getting along/accomplishing too much, so god fucked with them? Am I reading this correctly?
They also weren't invented for another 5000 years.Yeah, fun fact: Bulbous bows are only useful when you have forward speed. The Ark has no propulsion.
Taking everything in the Bible literally is a fundamentalist thing.
They would die though. Not that many could withstand the salinity change. Freshwater fishes would be killed by the mixing with ocean water, and similarly saltwater fishes by the fresh water. It's a narrow band that can survive in brackish water, via osmoregulation, all others would die very quickly.My favorite part of the flood story is that the fish drowned, apparently.
Adam and Eve has to be literal for Christianity to "work". Without it being literal there is no Original Sin, and Original Sin needs to exist if the sacrifice of Jesus is supposed to mean anything.
Adam and Eve then is the point where evolution and Christianity fall into conflict. The closest you can get to resolving that is if you accept there were souless humans around, and then God injected souls into two of them which then allows you to extract a literal Adam and Eve story. Though that does throw up questions around why those two and not others etc.
ZOOM IN ON THE KIDS FACE
You've conspicuously left out 'well educated'.Lets not be ridiculous here.
You can be a very successful and mentally well adjusted while believing in YEC.
“Nobody’s ever attempted anything like this before,” Ham maintained, “because God never has brought all of these kinds of people — literally thousands of people — together to make it happen, until now.”
What is always amazing to me and I have had this same "talk" with my mom is that .. lets for a minute buy what they think. That the earth is 6000 years old or whatever... and was created by a God. Ok cool.. if I were them I would simply say well if it was able to create a world why not a mature world with a history of millions of years.
They never go down that route.. and it always baffles me but whatever.
(Answers in Genesis, like many fundamentalist Christians, believe that dinosaurs existed 6,000 years ago but were wiped out in the Great Flood.)
This is a backfire. Hey people, here's this thing we built to bible spec that's clearly not seaworthy and cannot fit half the animals you'll find in an average zoo.
Well done.
We used to have a Noah's Ark restaurant here in St. Louis. I'm not sure it was quite as big as this, but it was quite large and in shape of the ark. You entered it via a ramp and you could go on the roof.
Their drinks used to have giraffe swizzle sticks
Been out of business for like 20 years, but the building is still there, decaying.
What? They do! My cousin is a creationist and he told me that the earth was created 6000 years ago and anything that dates back further was created with that age attached to it by god.
...then why put one on the Ark?
Umm it just sounds like a cool attraction to visit? Doesn't matter if you're Creationist or not.
Bonus: it also has the Coffindaffer's Crosses