Nah, there wasn't anything there to defend against. It was me illuminating what sounded like a bad, illogical theory. If the point of the SkyOdin kill was to discredit me and my list, why would I have done that as a scum player? I know I do some odd things, but that would be a bad move.
I invite you to find a second killer. I also invite you to realize I'm not the scum player in this scenario at all.
This would be too much effort to read through all your posts and quote all the instances. The Sorian Strategy. I know it from how hard we've argued back and forth, just to find that you've reversed your position. Probably nobody else is really paying attention to our arguments, so maybe that's why nobody has really pointed it out. The Sorian Strategy.
In order:
People have framed themselves before in an attempt to say "why would I do that as scum?" It's worked to varying degrees from blowing up in your own face to getting away with murder. You readily admit that gambits are your bread and butter, I'm not putting it past you.
I'm not looking for a second killer. I'm keeping the option open. Much like I don't care about voting for Camjo today. Hints of a missed kill could lend credence to something happening with Camjo (being recruited, going rogue, whatever) while the presence of a second killing action especially one that was prevented night 1 points some evidence at Karu. We've had one night phase. I can't glean much from that without a comparison of other nights.
While you claim The Sorian Strategy, I'll help you out. People change their minds when new information is input. It happens, if someone was drastically flip flopping all over the ground, that would be cause to worry as would keeping firm beliefs in the face of overwhelming new evidence but slight changes over the course of the game? Yeah, I'd hope that would be happening to account for the inevitability of being wrong sometimes and right sometimes.