So Battlefield 1942 wasn't a Battlefield game?
Battlefield: Hellfighters would be better than Battlefield... 1
No choppers, no Battlefield.
Well, I have to agree with them on that. They've been preparing this event since a long time, the hype is going up and up and up and MS fucked up everything by leaking this artwork just a few hours before the event. I can understand why it makes them salty about it.
And, it's my opinion but, it's nice to see some honesty and not the usual "PR talk" that we have those days, with people like Phil Spencer and all this "we are all friends and fans of video games, we are a family and love each others so much" bullshit. ^^"
Something make you angry say it, be respectful, but say it.
And technicaly, he didn't say MoneySoft but MicroMoney, it's absolutly not the same thing!![]()
Yes but I respect it. Pretty much means 'back to basics' and gives a middle finger to sequel naming conventions.Battlefield 1 is such a dumb name lol
No choppers, no Battlefield.
![]()
Glad I was wrong, that fucking rad.
I'm glad we have confirmation of a WW1 setting. Not because I was rooting for it, but because I want people to be more aware of what happened during that era. I've seen so many comments the past couple of weeks that are incredibly misinformed, it's going to be nice to have more people out there with a better idea of what went down.
I hope that we get a better narrative this time around. I've always liked the Battlefield campaigns, but the storytelling hasn't always been great. Focusing on 6 different soldiers and their struggle through, presumably, 6 different battles could make for some nice soap opera-esque drama. I'm really into it.
Nah. It's still dumb.
Calling it Battlefield 1 because it's the earliest game in the "Battlefield Timeline" is a ridiculous argument because there's no "Battlefield Timeline." It's just Battlefield. By that logic, Metal Gear Solid 3 should have been called Metal Gear Solid 1.
Let's see if their gameplay reflects this.Yes but I respect it. Pretty much means 'back to basics' and gives a middle finger to sequel naming conventions.
Fuck yes!!!! So hyped!!
Also MS is a fuck for this.
What a ridiculous reaction to that tweet. I am sure you wouldn't be upset if you were in their shoes as well.
Yes but I respect it. Pretty much means 'back to basics' and gives a middle finger to sequel naming conventions.
That would require the entire game being about them. A DLC pack suggests otherwise
![]()
So Hellfighter Pack, and premiere is 18th October
"The regiment was nicknamed the Harlem Hellfighters, the Black Rattlers and the Men of Bronze, which was given to the regiment by the French.[3] The nickname "Hell Fighters" was given to them by the Germans due to their toughness and that they never lost a man through capture, lost a trench or a foot of ground to the enemy.[4] The "Harlem Hellfighters" were the first all black regiment that helped change the American public's opinion on African American soldiers and helped pave the way for future African American soldiers."
After BC2 was when the fun and hilarity of the BF series died. I want them to bring that back.
What a ridiculous reaction to that tweet. I am sure you wouldn't be upset if you were in their shoes as well.
anyone notice the pre-order bullshit in this image? bottom right
![]()
I guess.
And either way, the name's not that important. What's important and invaluably interesting is how they plan to shake things up (FINALLY) and give us something that's not Modern Warfare. That's what's important.
It's still not as bad of a name as Infinite Warfare.
I'm glad we have confirmation of a WW1 setting. Not because I was rooting for it, but because I want people to be more aware of what happened during that era. I've seen so many comments the past couple of weeks that are incredibly misinformed, it's going to be nice to have more people out there with a better idea of what went down.
I hope that we get a better narrative this time around. I've always liked the Battlefield campaigns, but the storytelling hasn't always been great. Focusing on 6 different soldiers and their struggle through, presumably, 6 different battles could make for some nice soap opera-esque drama. I'm really into it.
Battlefield has evolved, dude. 1942 is 14 years old. I don't wanna go back to that shit.
anyone notice the pre-order bullshit in this image? bottom right
![]()
If not Microsoft, then the retailer stuff would have happened..
Kinda wish it was a true to history WW1. What's to stop this from basically being another futuristic shooter? I bet they have stream powered jet packs.
anyone notice the pre-order bullshit in this image? bottom right
Kinda wish it was a true to history WW1. What's to stop this from basically being another futuristic shooter? I bet they have stream powered jet packs.
Except their is a game called Metal Gear Solid that came out before Metal Gear Solid 3.
Battlefield has evolved, dude. 1942 is 14 years old. I don't wanna go back to that shit.
Now with the big picture can we all agree that the guy is black. Which is cool given the timeline.
Battlefield 4 isn't going anywhere.
This dude down left looks like Hitler in black.
Maybe it's just me who sees this,no idea lol