Battlefield 6 Official Reveal Trailer

Loved the whole concept of the trailer. A battle in Brooklyn? That gets me hyped up.

I also say bring it back to BF4 size.

Having 12 letters of the alphabet on the map is too much for me

We just need flags A B C
 
Last edited:
Well, they did say they were taking inspiration from the movie Civil War (which starts exactly like the trailer).

I got to play briefly on PS5 through Battlefield Labs and liked what I saw. I don't play BF on consoles so I didn't really enjoy it but I liked it enough to give it a chance on launch.

The last campaign I played was BF1 and thought it was OK. It was one of the first games with HDR I got to play and I kind of rememeber it was one of the first games with Atmos. I skipped V and 2042 didn't have any so I hope I can get a few hours out of this one like I did with 3 and 4 but the meat is in the MP. Can't wait to go back with my squad.
 
I'm hyped.

Glad it has a single player campaign. I know BF is first a multiplayer title, but sometimes I just want blow shit up alone.

What I'm really hoping for is that we'll be able to play the multiplayer mode offline with bots.
 
I'm hyped too. All of it screams BATTLEFIELD……. When. Tbeybweee making obvious the level of map and before destruction etc, the physics of it all. Is a Battlefield sayoale, that sadly went away it seems for me a long time ago now. Seems like they are going back to the roots. I'm hopeful. Looking forward to it.
 
Well, they did say they were taking inspiration from the movie Civil War (which starts exactly like the trailer).

I got to play briefly on PS5 through Battlefield Labs and liked what I saw. I don't play BF on consoles so I didn't really enjoy it but I liked it enough to give it a chance on launch.

The last campaign I played was BF1 and thought it was OK. It was one of the first games with HDR I got to play and I kind of rememeber it was one of the first games with Atmos. I skipped V and 2042 didn't have any so I hope I can get a few hours out of this one like I did with 3 and 4 but the meat is in the MP. Can't wait to go back with my squad.
Yeah, I was surprised how directly they ripped the Civil War opening scene.
 
Honestly this SP campaign is suddenly my most hyped game for the remainder of the year. Been starving for a serious AAA military high budget SP campaign without Nicki Minaj and actual destruction.
 
Last edited:
Ironic use of Dylan's song. I'm surprised he signed off on it. Nonetheless, I'm cautiously optimistic about the game. Hope it runs well enough on my 3080 @ 4k.
 
Huge fan sine BF1942. Ran a main clan in PC BF2. Battlefield has been junk since BF3.

Trailer did nothing for me.
Campaign shouldnt exist for the franchise, period.

It all hinges on the MP reveal.
If its fast wacky super hero super soldier nonsense - no thanks.
 
Sick trailer and I like the idea of it. Could actually be a decent SP campaign. And if all the maps are based in like, North America or the Americas that would be sick.

I don't have a ton of faith though. Only BF's I've enjoyed a lot were 1942 and 4. Played all of them though.
 
Last edited:
That was a bad fucking trailer. Worse than that, it looked like a Call of Duty trailer rather than a Battlefield one -- and no amount of fake destruction from those fake in-engine scenarios could change that.

Just what are we meant to be looking at there? The singleplayer portion of the game that, per the latest reports, is incredibly behind schedule after EA closed down the development studio leading the charge on it? Is it all a tone-setting, worldbuilding-centered marketing piece like that Marathon cinematic that had nothing to do with the actual game? One thing is for sure, it ain't no representation or anything close to that of the game's moment-to-moment multiplayer experience.

EA continuing to be totally useless at their only job, which is to fund and sell the game.
 
Last edited:
Hold firm lads. If the game is missing any of these crucial elements, it's our duty to trash it. No matter how hungry we are for a new AAA military shooter.

1. Server rental with full customization. Lost since BF4. We got nothing in exchange for this feature that was once considered a barebones standard expectation. 24/7 METRO | 15K TICKETS
2. Classes without any shred of hero characters
3. Four person squads
4. Unscripted environmental destruction. BFBC2 style. Levelution was a huge downgrade. I want to pop the top on sniper nests with a noob tube.
5. The two-round burst AN-94. Also known as the greatest battle rifle ever simulated in a military shooter.
6. FULL IN GAME VOICE CHAT. Again, this was also a barebones, standard expectation in even the lowest budget game.
 
Trailer kinda remind me a bit of kz1 trailer with visari speaking in the background...

(nowhere as good of course)
 
Last edited:
mmm GIF

bowling polishing GIF
 
Massive BF fan and "veteran" of the franchise, but this cinematic trailer did precisely zero for my anticipation or excitement for the upcoming game. The US jingoism alone under the current real administration left me ice cold (read: indifferent). I feel absolutely nothing, seeing a fictitious Brooklyn Bridge being attacked. I could not give a fuck if that happened for real.

Anyway, hopefully multiplayer is good.
 
Hold firm lads. If the game is missing any of these crucial elements, it's our duty to trash it. No matter how hungry we are for a new AAA military shooter.

1. Server rental with full customization. Lost since BF4. We got nothing in exchange for this feature that was once considered a barebones standard expectation. 24/7 METRO | 15K TICKETS
2. Classes without any shred of hero characters
3. Four person squads
4. Unscripted environmental destruction. BFBC2 style. Levelution was a huge downgrade. I want to pop the top on sniper nests with a noob tube.
5. The two-round burst AN-94. Also known as the greatest battle rifle ever simulated in a military shooter.
6. FULL IN GAME VOICE CHAT. Again, this was also a barebones, standard expectation in even the lowest budget game.

1) We will never get this again. Game companies do not want you to have any control over multiplayer experiences. They like skewing matchmaking in favour of player retention instead of fair play and don't want to deal with the occasional bad racist admin / server making them look bad.
2) This might happen. It sounds like they're split 50 / 50 on this atm with that announcement about locked loadouts and the beta.
3) Might happen. I would like the series to go back to spawning only on the squad leader though. Spawning on anyone is shitty for conquest mode.
4) This seems very likely. The dam explosion in the trailer is a heavy hint.
5) Please no meta must picks. Variety of useful options would be nice.
6) This could possibly happen in squads? If it is in it's very likely going to be opt in though which means no one will ever use it and friends will just use discord. It is very unlikely that voice chat will be default and enabled / forced.
 
1) We will never get this again. Game companies do not want you to have any control over multiplayer experiences. They like skewing matchmaking in favour of player retention instead of fair play and don't want to deal with the occasional bad racist admin / server making them look bad.
2) This might happen. It sounds like they're split 50 / 50 on this atm with that announcement about locked loadouts and the beta.
3) Might happen. I would like the series to go back to spawning only on the squad leader though. Spawning on anyone is shitty for conquest mode.
4) This seems very likely. The dam explosion in the trailer is a heavy hint.
5) Please no meta must picks. Variety of useful options would be nice.
6) This could possibly happen in squads? If it is in it's very likely going to be opt in though which means no one will ever use it and friends will just use discord. It is very unlikely that voice chat will be default and enabled / forced.
Ah, so it's just fool's gold. I'm not that desperate. WWIII was a proof of concept that we can get this type of game from the indie realm. It didn't deliver, but hopefully the next one will.
 
There were lots of good and bad battlefields over the years , but there was not 1 bad trailer.
I really want this to be good but I'm ready to be disappointed.
This is coming from a guy who preordered 2042.
 
no girl bosses. no "sex: other" characters. actual gritty warfare and heroes. OFF TO A GOOD START in my opinion!! pumped for the multiplayer trailer. (btw: remember when they said Sundance was "non-binary"? LOLOLOLLOLOLOOL PEPPERIDGE FARMS REMEMBERS!!!)
 
Got MW2019 vibes from that trailer.

To clarify, that game played like ass. But the tone and theming were spot on. They're clearly trying to capture the audience who want a serious military shooter, who have been abandoned by Cod.
 
On the one hand it's hard to get hyped up by a cinematic BF trailer since it all just looks like generic warfare. It's all about the gameplay and maps, which we don't get to see here.
On the other hand at least it looks more in line with the style of the older games and it's not diverse disabled brave woman on the frontiles, which isn't a given these days.
 
Last edited:
1) We will never get this again. Game companies do not want you to have any control over multiplayer experiences. They like skewing matchmaking in favour of player retention instead of fair play and don't want to deal with the occasional bad racist admin / server making them look bad.
this one really stuck in my craw and I want to address it again. When has this ever happened? I can't think of a single highly publicized dust up of this elusive racist server admin harming the reputation of the company. The company who rents the servers did a good enough job filtering this, plus informed game journalists only need to report on it truthfully. The publisher has no control over who rents the servers. It's just the way this business/hobby works. The amazing thing about dedicated servers, if you don't like an admin, you never ever have to play on his server.

No this is all an excuse to funnel gamers toward purchases that a true dedicated server model would make unnecessary. We must never accept this as a valid excuse in any way.
 
My overall take. The trailer could have been better.

They are reeally trying to win people back IMO.

Game is really, really pushing that dirty, harsh, everything explodes feeling BC2, BF3/4, and BF1 had.

The music selection is really really bad tho. I like the old BF theme coming in but it feels off from the edit of the trailer. 2042 reveal trailer and Portal trailer flowed waaay better. Someone needs to reedit the trailer with better music and cuts.

All that being said. It looks like the single player could be fun. I know a lot of people arent fans of a BF single player..but i always enjoy them when they are offered.
 
I swear it always the same, people still havent learned that a trailer doesnt even remotely represent a finished quality game.
Rememeber this one, yeah? People pre ordering left and right and then you got an unfinished broken game for over a year. Whoever pre orders BF6 is a moron:



H1q7aE18vRmGGXay.png
 
Last edited:
I swear it always the same, people still havent learned that a trailer doesnt even remotely represent a finished quality game.
Rememeber this one, yeah? People pre ordering left and right and then you got an unfinished broken game for over a year. Whoever pre orders BF6 is a moron:



H1q7aE18vRmGGXay.png

Who said it did? We've already seen the actual game multiple times, some have played it.

We're not fucking stupid you know. (well most of us)
 
Last edited:
I swear it always the same, people still havent learned that a trailer doesnt even remotely represent a finished quality game.
Rememeber this one, yeah? People pre ordering left and right and then you got an unfinished broken game for over a year. Whoever pre orders BF6 is a moron:



H1q7aE18vRmGGXay.png

Difference here to me was the 2042 trailer didn't take itself seriously and tried to be an over the top John Woo action flick where this new trailer seemed more serious

All my 2 cents
 
Top Bottom