Gareth Bale
Member
It may as well be.
Natural resources mate. You need to play more Civ V. There's always oil somewhere under the ice.
It may as well be.
I find this addiction (Edit: Well, not addiction, not sure what word to use, infatuation?) to the royals a bit silly nowadays. They're just going to end up naming everything after Victoria and Elizabeth. Should just rename the Earth as Queen Elizatoria.
Also, I'm surprised the US doesn't "own" a part of Antartica, why is that?
Natural resources mate. You need to play more Civ V. There's always oil somewhere under the ice.
I find this addiction (Edit: Well, not addiction, not sure what word to use, infatuation?) to the royals a bit silly nowadays. The British are just going to end up naming everything after Victoria and Elizabeth. Should just rename the Earth as Queen Elizatoria.
Also, I'm surprised the US doesn't "own" a part of Antartica, why is that?
I jut turn to my gf o say this sounds like the worlds worst theme park.is this a theme park? if not if should be.
That is such bullshit.
Can they even do this, international naming convention law-wise?
Irregardless, I refuse to recognize Antarctica as British soil.
It is neutral land, belonging to no one nation or group of human beings..
I jut turn to my gf o say this sounds like the worlds worst theme park.
Surprised no one is talking about the cabinet meeting, that was pretty historic.
can i have that unclaimed bit?
I'm sure you've got a good point somewhere in this post, but my eyes keep going back to this word.
"Way to go, Europe"? What exactly is that supposed to mean? Antarctica does not have any indigenous population and it is not a natural part of any nation, so why can't it belong to whoever explored and claimed it first?Oh Brits. Why doesn't the UN have sole claim over Antarctica?
Oh, and apparently Nazi Germany had a claim in Antarctica. Way to go, Europe.
From Australian Government website.
It's not owned by them, it is claimed by them. The Argentinian and Chilean claims are not recognized by any other states, and the British claim is only recognized by Norway, Australia, France and New Zealand. It is a bit wrong to say that anyone owns land in Antarctica but that does not stop states from claiming that they own it.I just love the idea that there is a little bit of antarctica that is owned by 3 countries at the same time
It's not owned by them, it is claimed by them. The Argentinian and Chilean claims are not recognized by any other states, and the British claim is only recognized by Norway, Australia, France and New Zealand. It is a bit wrong to say that anyone owns land in Antarctica but that does not stop states from claiming that they own it.
Anyone who'd prefer Cromwell over Britain's current royalty has absolutely no knowledge of Cromwell.
Of course nobody prefers Cromwell, just as nobody really wants to emulate Guy Fawkes.Anyone who'd prefer Cromwell over Britain's current royalty has absolutely no knowledge of Cromwell.