• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

BBC: PS2 hype "never really materialised".

Jeffahn

Member
The PlayStation 3 (PS3) is slated for release next spring and Mr Kutaragi says it promises to usher in a whole new era of entertainment, though observers point to hype like this about the PS2, which never really materialised.

Link

...
 
I don't know what they mean, I'm currently plugged into a cyberworld just like the matrix and every character has emotions!
 
Red Mercury said:
I say.... 4 maybe 5 posts till we get old guy from Silent Hill 3.

02.jpg


Say what?
 
That sentence is terribly written! I know what it means but what it says is something else: "the PS2, which never really materialised". The PS2 never materialised?! OMG I'VE BEEN LIVING IN A FANTASY WORLD.
 
yeah the sentence sucks but they are correct - all the online stuff like video and music on demand, web browsing etc never really materialised. In fact all sony's hype actually achieved was waking microsoft up to the fact that sony wanted to take away their ball.
 
am i the only one that thinks this is about the whole promise of ps2 changing the entire way we watch movies / listen to music / watch tv / browse the web / play games thing that sony went on about before launch rather than graphics?

Because that's exactly what they are going on about again with the PS3 (cell, networking, streaming music, movies and even game content etc - change the way we network blah blah)
 
only gamers can decide if the PS2 has presented a new era of entertainment or not.. I see tons of great games, PS2 is my standard DVD player, for the first time I am listening to 5.1 surround sound for games & movies and my friends play online.

I think all these things have never presented together in one machine before the PS2 has arrived, oh I forgot something, nowadays we see a lot of collaboration between gaming and movies industries.

so yes, PS2 was a new era of entertainment as Ken promised.

though the article has some nice info:

Ken Kutaragi was the engineer at Sony behind the venture. He told Click Online he faced enormous internal resistance to the original PlayStation project: 99% of senior execs were against the idea

"Thankfully our team made a prototype very quickly, and everyone involved was convinced that the project would become a huge success in future.

"We brought the prototypes with us to a presentation of senior executives, and outlined our dream. The then CEO, Mr Oga, gave us the green light so we were thoroughly delighted."

"I am an engineer and I like technology. I want to change the world with technology and I want to change our lives. The best way to realise it is, for us, PlayStation.

Mr Kutaragi would not be drawn directly into commenting on the threat from Redmond, but he does believe that the power of the PlayStation is making PC makers think again.

While the computer itself is evolving significantly, it's also the case that new types of computers, like the PlayStation, are going into millions of homes all around the world.

"Companies working on PCs worry that their markets may be reduced to being simply the office environment. That's why they're making various attempts to approaching the next big market - real-time computing and the home."

"I am really pleased to be occasionally called the father of the PlayStation.

"But my dream, and the dream of all my team, hasn't finished. In fact we haven't achieved even half of what we're going to do.

"We want to lead with the PlayStation 3, and beyond that to the PlayStation 4 within the next decade."
 
Deg said:
BBC are being stupid and clueless about games as usual. :lol

I would agree with your general point, but I do think it is significant that they did make a point of saying that the PS2 has not lived up to the hype, and I would agree with them on that. You can list as many great PS2 games as you want, but it chang the fact that the machine has not made good on its promises.

...
 
Almost by definition, hype is going to be exaggerated. But I do think the PS2 did step up to the 'emotion engine' thing in a certain way...

Before PS2 the negative side of gaming was generally perceived as 'a waste of time'... oh, the kids should be reading, playing outside etc. But now I think the negative side of gaming is interpreted directly from the content and potential emotional response. Video game violence has become much more real this gen, and conservative beliefs have leapt from thinking games are of no real cultural value, to thinking that they are now so realistic that they might begin to define cultural values.
 
Red Mercury said:
I say.... 4 maybe 5 posts till we get old guy from Silent Hill 3.

That screen shot is less than impressive. It has detail, but no emotion, style or anything remotely "wow". but I'm not a techie graphic whore that goes ga ga over technical feats.
 
"Toy story" graphics encompass both the models, textures etc aswell as the animation, and in that case no game this generation would come remotely close on any conceivably measurable scale.
 
its the same about all the hype on other machines like xbox or gamecube,i remember a lot of promises from everyone
 
It lived up to (most of) the promises made by Sony, but not the media.

The press blew things way the hell out of proportion and said many things that just weren't true. The fact that the internet wasn't quite as popular also prevented people from seeing the reality of the situation. I never believed any of that and, in fact, slandered the PS2 quite a bit in favor of the DC. Very foolish of me as it is a great machine. I've learned that acting like someone such as, say, Jeffahn is just moronic and pointless. I enjoy all machines and what they offer.

I feel that the PS2 impressed me more often than any of the other current machines simply because it often went above and beyond what I thought was possible at various times. There was a HUGE ramp up in quality over the years as well. Look back at something like Rumble Racing and then take a look at Burnout Revenge. That's a larger upgrade than most XBOX->X360 games have been.
 
No, PS2 was just another console. The online era (not talking about sega channel) for consoles started on dreamcast, and ps2 online was basically the same as dc (and PC way ahead anyway). PS1 was a console/CD player, so DVD is not a huge leap (and PC was way ahead anyway). PS2 is better-looking than DC, but not by all that much, especially the first couple years (and PC was way ahead anyway). The PS2 didn't change the way I played games or offer me anything I hadn't seen before. The PS1 did. The DC did. The Xbox did. The PC did. So I'd say the PS2 did not live up to the hype, although it is a very solid console with a nice library. Of course, you'd have to be voluntarily stupid to believe what Sony was saying, but that is a manageable hurdle for some.
 
P90 said:
That screen shot is less than impressive. It has detail, but no emotion, style or anything remotely "wow". but I'm not a techie graphic whore that goes ga ga over technical feats.

No emotion nor style, uh?... you should play the game.

As for the "hype" well it depends on your view really but games like Silent Hill 2, Silent Hill 3, RE4 (its on GC too but still), FFX, Shadow of the Colussuss, GOW, DMC series have completely justified the PS2 hype IMO.
 
PS2 is better-looking than DC, but not by all that much, especially the first couple years (and PC was way ahead anyway).
So very false.

The PS2 brought about what I'd call "the era high poly models". PC games were poly starved at that time and relied only on textures. The PS2 was throwing around much more complex games with many more effects at 60 fps. It took the PC some time to catch up...

That screen shot is less than impressive. It has detail, but no emotion, style or anything remotely "wow". but I'm not a techie graphic whore that goes ga ga over technical feats.
Play the game. The Silent Hill series is incredibly stylish and features some of the best art direction this gen.

I'm going to bed now, so I guess I'll miss out on the rest of this thread. Ah well...
 
I remember being so hyped for PS2 I almost bought one off the black market when they were sold out. Instead I ended up catching up with most my PlayStation 1 RPG backlog and by the time I was done GameCube was out, so I just went with that.

getaway_screen003.jpg


NEVER FORGET

I would say early adopters of the PS2 got their moneys worth. Just for the sheer number of games you can play on the system. Did it change the way we play games forever? Maybe. Grand Theft Auto was certainly a big step in expanding both the style of games we play and the people who play them. That game brought a lot of non-gamers in.
 
Does anyone remember how Trip Hawkins said that the PS2 was as revolutionary as the printing press and would change society in a fundamental way? No matter how bad the PS3 hype gets, it simply can't reach the level of retardation the PS2 hype got to.
 
Sathsquatch said:
No matter how bad the PS3 hype gets, it simply can't reach the level of retardation the PS2 hype got to.

:lol:lol

I didn't have have an internet connection when the PS2 came out, all I had to go by was magazines. With that said, I was in no way affected by any PS2 hype. As a matter of fact, the whole "Toy Story Graphics" and "Games with Emotions" was all brought to my attention really late into the PS2s life. Around the time I was able to a Internet connection at home.
 
trippingmartian said:
I would say early adopters of the PS2 got their moneys worth. Just for the sheer number of games you can play on the system.

You DO remember what the early days of the PS2 were like, right? I'd say only the early days of the XBox were more barren for quality titles that showed off what the system was capable of. Early adopters are always screwed.
 
"We want to lead with the PlayStation 3, and beyond that to the PlayStation 4 within the next decade."


Ken in 2006: "Playstation4 will be 10,000 times more powerful than Playstation3"

IBM in 2012: "Playstation4 is an astonishing 27 times more powerful than Playstation3, but we had to make Ken quit smoking his special crack though"

:lol :lol
 
dark10x said:
It lived up to (most of) the promises made by Sony, but not the media.

The press blew things way the hell out of proportion and said many things that just weren't true. The fact that the internet wasn't quite as popular also prevented people from seeing the reality of the situation. I never believed any of that and, in fact, slandered the PS2 quite a bit in favor of the DC. Very foolish of me as it is a great machine. I've learned that acting like someone such as, say, Jeffahn is just moronic and pointless. I enjoy all machines and what they offer.

I feel that the PS2 impressed me more often than any of the other current machines simply because it often went above and beyond what I thought was possible at various times. There was a HUGE ramp up in quality over the years as well. Look back at something like Rumble Racing and then take a look at Burnout Revenge. That's a larger upgrade than most XBOX->X360 games have been.

amen bro
 
dark10x said:
So very false.

The PS2 brought about what I'd call "the era high poly models". PC games were poly starved at that time and relied only on textures. The PS2 was throwing around much more complex games with many more effects at 60 fps. It took the PC some time to catch up...

dc fanboys still thinks that shenmue ( the pinnacle of dc gfx) still cant be done by a ps2...this is bullshit
 
While the PS2 has some very pretty games, it took the Xbox a whole day to technically outclass its entire library at the time (Halo). And while it's true that not every Xbox game showed the system's power, there are at least a couple dozen that make the difference clear.
 
BigBoss said:
You should ask MS that question since they were the ones claiming Toy Story quality graphics, not Sony.

its ironic,a lot of ps2 hataz still use these sentences proved wrong and false a lot of time ago,fanboysm and ignorance are sisters i presume
 
Don't know how the online coverage compares, but the TV version of Click Online is the most sickeningly technically illiterate computing coverage I've ever had the misfortune to see.
 
Speevy said:
While the PS2 has some very pretty games, it took the Xbox a whole day to technically outclass its entire library at the time (Halo).

Yeah, the playmobil characters of Halo really showed MGS2/SH2/BGDA..etc.
(nice overall graphics though)
 
Speevy said:
While the PS2 has some very pretty games, it took the Xbox a whole day to technically outclass its entire library at the time (Halo). And while it's true that not every Xbox game showed the system's power, there are at least a couple dozen that make the difference clear.


2 years later.wadda u want? its normal,but its not the difference microsoft claimed on his day
 
We have a critical mass of fanboys. Thread over. And if you think PS2 games ever looked better than PC games of the same time period, you probably don't play PC games (see: quake 3 - about 1 year before PS2 came out).
 
Open Source said:
We have a critical mass of fanboys. Thread over. And if you think PS2 games ever looked better than PC games of the same time period, you probably don't play PC games (see: quake 3 - about 1 year before PS2 came out).

i want to see a pc circa 2000 doing some ps2 games of today
 
Open Source said:
We have a critical mass of fanboys. Thread over. And if you think PS2 games ever looked better than PC games of the same time period, you probably don't play PC games (see: quake 3 - about 1 year before PS2 came out).


Weren't you working on some killer PS2 engine that could do stuff never done before in any PS2 game? What happened to that?

About the PC argument - there were particular games that looked great on PC and some stuff looked great on PS2. PC stuff looked great cause it was high res. PS2 is a piece of shit technically so I really don't give a shit. Sony got their act together for PSP and PS3 and that's good stuff.
 
Speevy said:
While the PS2 has some very pretty games, it took the Xbox a whole day to technically outclass its entire library at the time (Halo). And while it's true that not every Xbox game showed the system's power, there are at least a couple dozen that make the difference clear.


What?!


Never change Speevy...
 
Mr Gump said:
"Toy story" graphics encompass both the models, textures etc aswell as the animation, and in that case no game this generation would come remotely close on any conceivably measurable scale.

You missed the biggest part. Lighting.
 
Top Bottom