Politico seem to have been funded by USAID
The new products come as Pro has gone from a 2010 side project to a 200-person operation that drives half of Politico’s yearly revenues. Over the past three years, revenue has grown 30 percent year over year, and it maintains a 90 percent renewal rate with its client base, according to the company.
“A lot of organizations have gotten a ‘Trump bump,’ which has died down. It hasn’t for us,” said Bobby Moran, Politico’s vp and gm. “[Pro] is not a luxury item. This is something [our subscribers] have to have to do their jobs.”
By digital media standards, Pro serves a small audience. Just 20,000 of Politico’s 30 million monthly unique visitors read Pro content, according to Moran.
Yet those readers are incredibly valuable. A five-person subscription to Pro costs $8,000. Institutional subscriptions cost even more. That same subscription cost $2,495 when Pro first debuted in 2010 — “We actually underpriced ourselves in the market,” Moran said — but it also offered a lot less content back then. Pro now covers 16 legislative areas, up from the three it debuted with in 2010. It also delivers Congressional Research Service reports and maintains a congressional directory and a calendar of public policy events happening not just in Washington, but in several other capitals Pro serves.
In before lock.
Lots of people getting points today in this thread.
![]()
Not sure that it (the missed payroll) actually is related - but more importantly is that funding is headed there regardless of the truth of the relation to the first portion.I don't see this as definitive. The timing is interesting, and could prove damning, but it's missing the concrete link between USAID deletion and funding loss.
In before lock.
Lots of people getting points today in this thread.
![]()
What's the prize for the biggest bag of points?A 10 pointer post here.
Still only 2 points.Dammit, I forgot to include my Benjamin Franklin bitch tits analysis.
Op can earn 20 points. And getting a ban over political meltdowns probably a lot of points.What's the prize for the biggest bag of points?
![]()
I get my news from memes.Yep, also I'd highly recommend no one get their news from a gaming forum/website.
Only that the payroll issue is related. The fact that they are getting USAID payouts, however, is confirmed.This is unconfirmed, OP
So the White House Press Secretary is now a "MAGA Influencer"? Asking for a friend.![]()
MAGA Influencers Push Bizarre Claim That Politico Was Getting Funded By USAID — Here’s the Truth
MAGA influencers pushed erroneous claims that Politico was being “funded” by USAID, mistaking subscriptions for grants.www.mediaite.com
Take a wild guess. Look at that guy’s Twitter timeline. How have we become so fucking gullible as a country?So is this true or do we have to be careful of the OP in future?
I dunno, I decided to read several other articles and it isn't exactly what people are making it out to be. It's like saying Sony is government funded because I bought a PS5So the White House Press Secretary is now a "MAGA Influencer"? Asking for a friend.
So the White House Press Secretary is now a "MAGA Influencer"? Asking for a friend.
Only if you're receiving government capital with the goal of purchasing Ps5s. In that case, sure.I dunno, I decided to read several other articles and it isn't exactly what people are making it out to be. It's like saying Sony is government funded because I bought a PS5
This makes sense to you? Expense sheet implies it's a government covered expense - the "pro editorial product" is thousands of US dollars. Why is this happening and why is it expense paid? Even if it's "lol just this" - this is acceptable somehow to you?“Digging in on the claims, Associated Press reporter Byron Tau explained that Politico was not receiving funding from USAID but appeared on the government’s expense sheets because staff were buying subscriptions to Politico’s Pro editorial product. This, he added, was the case across many federal government agencies and departments and was not because Politico was being grant funded.”
How are you people this simple? Just zero critical thinking. If the claim aligns with your biases, it’s true no matter how ridiculous and any evidence proving it wrong is swept away as MSM fake news.
Hey bud, did you hear about what Soros and Gates pulled the other day?This makes sense to you? Expense sheet implies it's a government covered expense - the "pro editorial product" is thousands of US dollars. Why is this happening and why is it expense paid? Even if it's "lol just this" - this is acceptable somehow to you?
![]()
Politico now has 20,000 paid subscribers that account for half of its revenue
Six years after starting with three newsletters, Politico Pro now employs over 200 people and accounts for nearly half the politics publisher's yearly revenue.digiday.com
This article claims it's over half of politico's revenue.. as of 2017.
Wow, you're nothing like what you make fun of at all.Hey bud, did you hear about what Soros and Gates pulled the other day?
TLDR: Jewish space lasers
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONSWow, you're nothing like what you make fun of at all.
any evidence proving it wrong is swept away as MSM fake news.
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
Look it up. Do your own research.
Q
Hey bud, did you hear about what Soros and Gates pulled the other day?
TLDR: Jewish space lasers
Listen DownLikeBCPowder, Soros is behind this. Possibly Rockefeller and Schwab as well (also Jews). This Politico state funding has their Jewish hands all over it! Check out this post on Twitter I just found for proof:
Benny Johnson is totally not an anti-semitic nutjob peddling bullshit. He’s the voice of reason!This thread is most assuredly getting locked.
10 points for calling out maga influencers. And another 10 for calling out the call out.
Take your ten points and celebrate you got in before lock.Benny Johnson is totally not an anti-semetic nutjob peddling bullshit. He’s the voice of reason!
And by god, doesn't it show.USAID sponsored the BBC.
Think about this for a moment.