LaserBuddha
Member
I'd love to hear this one rationalized.You better hope he wins, because if Hillary wins I'm voting for Trump.
I'd love to hear this one rationalized.You better hope he wins, because if Hillary wins I'm voting for Trump.
You better hope he wins, because if Hillary wins I'm voting for Trump.
As an Australian who enjoys observing American politics, I've found the fervent Sanders support to be disquieting without being able to identity why.
I think this thread has finally cleared up the reason for me. A lot of Sanders support seem to be predicated on the expectation that democratic socialism is the easy answer to any and all problems. The nebulously defined Big Business is the source of nearly all ills, and a socialist in the Executive will defeat this wretched foe and bring happiness for all.
Similarly, all his weaknesses, real and perceived are brushed aside either as unimportant or also being solved by socialism. His historical inability to connect with minorities is simply ignored, with supporters insisting that his economic policies will automatically be completely beneficial to minorities.
Everything just feels like a weird fever pitch. People have identified a couple of easily perceived Bad Guys and think Bernie, the Chosen Hero and his Sword of Socialism will go forth and slay the dragon. We like talking about the fantasy land Trump supporters are in, but I feel Sanders supporters are setting themselves up for disappointment even if he becomes President.
As an Australian who enjoys observing American politics, I've found the fervent Sanders support to be disquieting without being able to identity why.
I think this thread has finally cleared up the reason for me. A lot of Sanders support seem to be predicated on the expectation that democratic socialism is the easy answer to any and all problems. The nebulously defined Big Business is the source of nearly all ills, and a socialist in the Executive will defeat this wretched foe and bring happiness for all.
Similarly, all his weaknesses, real and perceived are brushed aside either as unimportant or also being solved by socialism. His historical inability to connect with minorities is simply ignored, with supporters insisting that his economic policies will automatically be completely beneficial to minorities.
Everything just feels like a weird fever pitch. People have identified a couple of easily perceived Bad Guys and think Bernie, the Chosen Hero and his Sword of Socialism will go forth and slay the dragon. We like talking about the fantasy land Trump supporters are in, but I feel Sanders supporters are setting themselves up for disappointment even if he becomes President.
It does seem to me that a significant amount of Bernie supporters believe that once Bernie is in office, everything will magically get better.
The real world doesn't work like that.
If you're not busting balls for a rise, why? Bernie and hilldawg are practically the same. I prefer Bernie on his drug, gun, and health stances. But hill is right there with him. While Trump aint even in the same ball park. Why the big change in your political stance?You better hope he wins, because if Hillary wins I'm voting for Trump.
It does seem to me that a significant amount of Bernie supporters believe that once Bernie is in office, everything will magically get better.
The real world doesn't work like that.
Lol, generalizations are easy when you're targeting one or two people.I think that Bernie is the best candidate. I'm capable of voting for him without believing in magic. How does this fit in to your view of Sanders' supporters? Enough with this condescending crap.
I think that Bernie is the best candidate. I'm capable of voting for him without believing in magic. How does this fit in to your view of Sanders' supporters? Enough with this condescending crap.
There's a lot of projection going into this. I think you have to take Occam's Razor at this point: in an era of corporate interests controlling politics and cynical, sardonic politicians who rarely feel like they represent their own views or those of their constituents but instead the opinions of backers and lobbyists, it's refreshing to find someone who is passionate and animated about something anyone can tell he honestly believes.As an Australian who enjoys observing American politics, I've found the fervent Sanders support to be disquieting without being able to identity why.
I think this thread has finally cleared up the reason for me. A lot of Sanders support seem to be predicated on the expectation that democratic socialism is the easy answer to any and all problems. The nebulously defined Big Business is the source of nearly all ills, and a socialist in the Executive will defeat this wretched foe and bring happiness for all.
Similarly, all his weaknesses, real and perceived are brushed aside either as unimportant or also being solved by socialism. His historical inability to connect with minorities is simply ignored, with supporters insisting that his economic policies will automatically be completely beneficial to minorities.
Everything just feels like a weird fever pitch. People have identified a couple of easily perceived Bad Guys and think Bernie, the Chosen Hero and his Sword of Socialism will go forth and slay the dragon. We like talking about the fantasy land Trump supporters are in, but I feel Sanders supporters are setting themselves up for disappointment even if he becomes President.
I think that Bernie is the best candidate. I'm capable of voting for him without believing in magic. How does this fit in to your view of Sanders' supporters? Enough with this condescending crap.
Honestly, when you post something this condescending, you have to back it up with some empirical data. Can you point to anything other than an isolated anecdote that shows this?It does seem to me that a significant amount of Bernie supporters believe that once Bernie is in office, everything will magically get better.
The real world doesn't work like that.
Chelsea Clinton said:"Sen. Sanders wants to dismantle Obamacare, dismantle the CHIP program, dismantle Medicare, and dismantle private insurance," she said, according to MSNBC. "I worry if we give Republicans Democratic permission to do that, well go back to an erabefore we had the Affordable Care Actthat would strip millions and millions and millions of people off their health insurance."
If you're not busting balls for a rise, why? Bernie and hilldawg are practically the same. I prefer Bernie on his drug, gun, and health stances. But hill is right there with him. While Trump aint even in the same ball park. Why the big change in your political stance?
This Dem primary looks like a delightful tea party compared to what the GOP side is doing. Bernie has not faced anything like what guys like Trump and Cruz throw. Neither has Clinton for that matter, except from the Republicans who are looking at her as a threat in the general.
Are you serious?
Honestly, when you post something this condescending, you have to back it up with some empirical data. Can you point to anything other than an isolated anecdote that shows this?
As an Australian who enjoys observing American politics, I've found the fervent Sanders support to be disquieting without being able to identity why.
I think this thread has finally cleared up the reason for me. A lot of Sanders support seem to be predicated on the expectation that democratic socialism is the easy answer to any and all problems. The nebulously defined Big Business is the source of nearly all ills, and a socialist in the Executive will defeat this wretched foe and bring happiness for all.
Similarly, all his weaknesses, real and perceived are brushed aside either as unimportant or also being solved by socialism. His historical inability to connect with minorities is simply ignored, with supporters insisting that his economic policies will automatically be completely beneficial to minorities.
Everything just feels like a weird fever pitch. People have identified a couple of easily perceived Bad Guys and think Bernie, the Chosen Hero and his Sword of Socialism will go forth and slay the dragon. We like talking about the fantasy land Trump supporters are in, but I feel Sanders supporters are setting themselves up for disappointment even if he becomes President.
How about the fact that both the House of Representatives and the Senate have a Republican majority, making it virtually impossible for Bernie to put any of his ideas into practice, even in the unlikely event that he's elected?
Or how about the fact that he has consistently voted against increasing funding for NASA?
In any case, the point I was trying to make isn't one that can be proved with empirical data. People tend to ignore the big picture and focus on only things that support their claims when they really want something to happen.
Hence why I said a significant amount and not all of his supporters.
The fact of the matter is that many who belong to Bernie's voting base are very young and painfully unaware of the intricacies of the political game. It's not as simple as throwing money at and voting for one man.
The same can be said about Hillary if she got elected but somehow this only applies to Bernie.
I hope they're actually listening to him. The man himself says he's not going to be able to do it himself. People have to be constantly out their and push for change even after voting. And significant change isn't going to happen in one presidential term. We can't expect a benevolent dictator to solve our problems.
The same can be said about Hillary if she got elected but somehow this only applies to Bernie.
If the implication is that the the Presidency is irrelevant, I understand that sentiment, but it is untrue. Even Obama, who has faced opposition that is unlikely to ever be faced again for the foreseeable future, managed to get laws passed (not counting the AHA) and begin initiatives. The President has the power go lead the national conversation and start movements that wind up as laws. He also serves as his party's leader when it comes time to negotiate big pieces of legislature. He's got a lot of chips. And that's not to mention Supreme Court noms and executive actions.How about the fact that both the House of Representatives and the Senate have a Republican majority, making it virtually impossible for Bernie to put any of his ideas into practice, even in the unlikely event that he's elected?
That sucks. I don't see how that's related to his supporters thinking he's magical.Or how about the fact that he has consistently voted against increasing funding for NASA?
If you can't illustrate your point, I'm going to assume it's untrue. Saying that Sanders' supporters think he's going to solve all their problems is akin to me saying "Ted Cruz voters smelly like doody!" It's just an insult based on nothing except what your one friend said in a post on Facebook.In any case, the point I was trying to make isn't one that can be proved with empirical data. People tend to ignore the big picture and focus only on things that support their claims when they really want something to happen.
I'm in one-hundred percent agreement with you.
It's unfortunate that this fervor for positive change occurs so sporadically and seems to die down after the election season.
Republicans will almost certainly be more willing to compromise with Hillary than with Bernie.
Republicans will almost certainly be more willing to compromise with Hillary than with Bernie.
Republicans will almost certainly be more willing to compromise with Hillary than with Bernie.
It does seem to me that a significant amount of Bernie supporters believe that once Bernie is in office, everything will magically get better.
The real world doesn't work like that.
This election is far more about the USSC than the next Presidential term. It is, in fact, too important to lose. "Hey at least we made some noise, tho!" won't mean shit in the face of conservative justices being seated for life terms. For me it isn't about who is more honest between the two, who is more beholden to WallStreet, or what they promise to do when elected. Neither will be getting much anything past Congress and Presidents aren't dictators. The only thing that matters to me is elect-ability. I don't care how much Sanders' politics resonates with me ideologically, how much I like the guy, how righteous his cause is, or that flowers sprout behind his footsteps and doves fly overhead whenever he gives a speech. The bottom line is simple: I do not have confidence (yet) in his long term viability. I'm not straight and I'm not white but I am extremely cynical thanks to the last half decade in the US. You want me to have faith in my fellow countrymen to elect someone like him, through the hailstorm of attacks he'll endure once nominated, when Americans are giving a person like Donald goddamn Trump the time of day? I refuse to underestimate the power of fear mongering and racism in this country right now.The main problem I have with the 'Clinton is the more pragmatic choice' argument is that it only seems to be true in the short term. Even if she is more likely to prevent a Republican presidency, there are going to be more elections. Every election going forward is going to be important and the Democrats can't keep winning forever. That's why you can't treat this election as too important to lose. Eventually the Republicans will win the presidency and all of the compromise done to keep them out will have been wasted.
Socialism isn't going to just become more politically palatable on its own. Voters need to assert themselves and prove they are willing to support candidates they believe in. Otherwise, you're never going to make progress. Even if you lose, it's better to be as loud as possible. If you want socialism to be taken seriously, then you have to take it seriously yourself.
Republicans will almost certainly be more willing to compromise with Hillary than with Bernie.
I think the idea is that Hillary is more likely to get things done with Congress, although that might not always be something we want.The same can be said about Hillary if she got elected but somehow this only applies to Bernie.
Republicans will almost certainly be more willing to compromise with Hillary than with Bernie.
It does seem to me that a significant amount of Bernie supporters believe that once Bernie is in office, everything will magically get better.
The real world doesn't work like that.
I need a break down of Bernie and Clinton. I've really got hooked on Bernie after watching some of his videos, but I'm pretty dense when it comes to politics. I feel like I shouldn't vote, because I just don't have the knowledge to make a scholarly pick, but I will choose either democrat for the candidacy over ANY of those asshat republicans.
Republicans will almost certainly be more willing to compromise with Hillary than with Bernie.
At least he'll try to effect these changes. I'm not fully convinced any other candidates will.It does seem to me that a significant amount of Bernie supporters believe that once Bernie is in office, everything will magically get better.
The real world doesn't work like that.
At least he'll try to effect these changes. I'm not fully convinced any other candidates will.
Given the composition of the current Congress, the far right actually have a much higher chance of pushing through nonsense should they win, compared to either Bernie or Hillary. But that doesn't mean it's reasonable to vote for them, does it?If he fails, his supporters will turn on him just like they turned on Obama. He will become a shill, a sellout, a filthy moderate for trying to compromise just to get anything done. Let's stop acting like far left ideologues are somehow reasonable or aware of the political process any more than far right counterparts.
It's like Republicans who think they can vote in Cruz or Trump and stop all the immigrants and whatever other fantasies they have. The only difference there is they'd have complete dominance in all levels of government and numerous Supreme Court justices to replace.
Given the composition of the current Congress, the far right actually have a much higher chance of pushing through nonsense should they win, compared to either Bernie or Hillary. But that doesn't mean it's reasonable to vote for them, does it?
Bernie can win. He needs to win.
The Berning is just getting started
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3TNkJSPDm8
which is why midterms are more important.
i hope peoples passion remains after the election. republicans have too many fringe/proxy groups and initiatives to stay riled up for.
It does seem to me that a significant amount of Bernie supporters believe that once Bernie is in office, everything will magically get better.
The real world doesn't work like that.