Bethesda sent a Starfield review copy to the Fallout 4 DLSS modder who will release a DLSS 2 and 3 mod at launch

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love that hey is willing to do this, but people should not praise it at all. It shows that Bethesda just did a bad job going with AMD in this. I'm curious about Starfield, but im not gonna pay a modder for the shitty practice from Bethesda and AMD.
 
Okay so Bethesda won't add DLSS because AMD gave them money, but are okay with a modder adding DLSS to their game who sells said mod for money?

How is any of this based? This is retarded as fuck.
 
That's one way of never having any other deal with AMD.

Good job!

PS. Yes, this is shady AF.
PSS. Yes, having a deal with AMD and allowing this in the first place is shady AF, too
 
Last edited:
lol this guy will make bank, how much do they usually ask for these mods

also lol at fanboys trying to spin this as a save for bethesda. this is at best, them fucking over amd, on top players.
now i have to buy a graphic setting as my first dlc of the game. lucky me
 
Last edited:
SJRB said:
Okay so Bethesda won't add DLSS because AMD gave them money, but are okay with a modder adding DLSS to their game who sells said mod for money?

How is any of this based? This is retarded as fuck.
Click to expand...

It's almost like it's a rumor that's been denied already.
 
Fuz said:
Todd, you're a genius.
Click to expand...
Fuz said:
Todd, you're an idiot.
Click to expand...

turntables GIF
 
So MS fucks the consumer by making the deal with AMD then fucks AMD by purposely sending an early copy of the game to a modder so he/she can add DLSS.

Yeah real class act.
 
EDMIX said:
I mean, I'm rocking a 6950, but I'm in the middle of another build with a 4090, but I agree.

Nevermind fuck AMD, fuck Bethesda and MS for even excepting such a deal. I'm sure my 6950 build will run the game just fine, everything ultra, but still...I hate the feeling of knowing getting a 4090 build up and running will have features missing based on some dumbass deal with AMD.

Keep in mind, I'm sure those with 4090s and shit will be just fine, still feel such deals should really be happening in the hardware space like this.
Click to expand...
That's a lot of bad feelings... You sure that's not having an impact on your health?
 
These PC modders have turned into the cunts they despise. The Star Wars dlss mod cost like $10 and horizon zero Dawn mods to remove fog and extend the draw distance we're tied to patreons. Gtfo.
 
Mister Wolf said:
You need it and/or Frame Generation to run at 120fps with maxed setting.
Click to expand...
120 fps with framegen ISN'T 120 fps. It doesn't have the benefits of input lag and it does produce some visual artifacts.

However, it is a nice feature, to help smooth out the motion. It basically does motion interpolation at the GPU level.
 
Setsuna Mudou said:
Do you think you need DLSS with a 4090 to run a game made to run on the Series S?

Stop Motion No GIF by Mouse
Click to expand...
Based on how piss poor PC ports have been this year, I expect the performance to suck ass.

I am also expecting to be stuck at 60 fps max since Gamebryo engine games lock at 60.

But who knows? Maybe this will be THE game that MS finally has a solid launch. Releases relatively bug free with minor performance issues.

I wont be playing it on my XSX console because....fuck 30 fps.
 
JohnnyFootball said:
120 fps with framegen ISN'T 120 fps. It doesn't have the benefits of input lag and it does produce some visual artifacts.

However, it is a nice feature, to help smooth out the motion. It basically does motion interpolation at the GPU level.
Click to expand...

It is 120hz in motion on my display. Once I hit a framerate between 60-90fps native, conversations about input lag become pointless. I'm not playing Counter Strike. The people who downplay Frame Generation are people who do not have access to it. Sour grapes.
 
Last edited:
Mister Wolf said:
It is 120hz in motion on my display. Once I hit a framerate between 60-90fps native, conversations about input lag become pointless. The people who downplay Frame Generation are people who do not have access to it. Sour grapes.
Click to expand...
I have a 4090. I do have access to it and it can be quirky at times. It broke the Witcher 3 next gen.
 
⁸
JohnnyFootball said:
Yeah, it's a finishing touch. I'd love to see it in conjunction with ULMB2
Click to expand...

Baldurs Gate 3 could use it in those CPU heavy areas like the city. The Frame Generation mod served me well in Jedi Survivor. The game is damn near unplayable with raytracing without it. Very CPU limited in scenes.
 
Last edited:
It's like the old saying
"If it ain't fixed, don't fix it because the community will".
Or something like that
 
The only thing I wonder about all this let it be true or false, are the legal implications if they really provided a copy for this specific situation.
 
Ar¢tos said:
*sigh*
Defending the right of someone charging for their work doesn't mean every mod should be paid. It's up to mod creator to decide if he wants to charge or not for it.
Click to expand...

By charging for a mod, you're setting up a precedent, not a good one. Defend it all you like, still scummy. I'd gladly donate money to someone doing fine work for free like the people that made reshade or flawless widescreen or the thousands of other modders that fixed Bethesda's games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

IGNxGamer - DLSS 4 vs. DLSS 3 vs. FSR 3 Performance Review
22
4K
Imtjnotu replied
Is DLSS on Switch 2 the secret sauce of secret sauces?
21
221
keefged4 replied
Good Comparison of DLSS 4 vs 3
13
2K
viveks86 replied
DF: AMD FSR 4 Upscaling Tested vs DLSS 3/4 & - A Big Leap Forward - RDNA 4 Delivers!
4 5 6 7 8
363
24K
winjer replied
Looking for the best Fallout 3, Fallout New Vegas and Fallout 4 mods that are close to baseline
12
688
Strategize replied
Top Bottom