WTF! Is the first screen a concept art or what? Haha.![]()
![]()
Little Battlers
Um I think something's wrong with those screenshots. Second one looks like something that hasn't finished loading to me...Ouch at Dark Souls II. DS1 was already an ugly game but 2 is out of this world.
Hasn't this photo been discredited several times?
Hasn't this photo been discredited several times?
Uncharted 3 had some hefty downgrades. Was still pretty in the end though of course.
Halo 2
![]()
Nah, I just played Uncharted 3 and those scenes do look like that. It's strange though; those two scenes are easily the ugliest in the game, everything else is fantastic. It's especially noticeable in the Elena scene, where she looks very weird in that scene, but fine in the rest of the game.Hasn't this photo been discredited several times?
no. the e3 build looked good. and the final game looked good, but it was still a downgrade.
the worst come from SONY
KILZONE 2
MOTORSTORM
and some others:
DEEP DOWN
WATCH DOGS
Because it ended up looking worse than the first game, trying to squeeze in too many effects.
I never understood why they did this, since the cutscenes are pre-rendered anyway.
You know that those are cutscenes and the Uncharted cutscenes are not real time, right?
There's no reason to "downgrade" a CG.
um they first showed the PC version, and since first showing have only shown PS3 version-
(which on a side noteI can confirm does look and run alot better than I thought it would- yay broken street dates!)
Still looked good for the most part imo not a HUGE downgrade.
That one was a weird one, since the uncharted cutscenes are prerendered. hardware or anything has no bearing on it. so why the changes? namely the lighting.uncharted3
Couldn't? It's pre-rendered and they did it at E3. So framing it as "couldn't" just screams ill-informed.well. ya. thats why its weird.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnNTzl9608c#t=6m25s
why couldnt the cg look as good as that e3 video?
There's no reason to "downgrade" a CG.
well. ya. thats why its weird.
e3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvpu003drCk#1m18s
final game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnNTzl9608c#t=6m25s
why couldnt the cg look as good as that e3 video?
I also remember Enclave looking amazing from preview screenshots on a magazine.
Probably change of locations.
Wasn't the "CG" all done in-engine though, but turned into a video-file only to prevent load times?
I don't know how it had more effects. The lighting wasn't dynamic anymore in lots of places. The beginning level of Halo 1 had some great lighting. Nothing came close to that on Halo 2.
Surprised to see no mention of Aliens: Colonial Marines.
May not be the biggest downgrade but its still pretty big.
Wasn't the "CG" all done in-engine though, but turned into a video-file only to prevent load times?
Yeah, and I think the game looks pretty much that good in reality, somethings look better, somethings look worse.This is:
Reveal:
![]()
Final:
![]()
This is commonly thought, but you can skip any of the cutscenes and move straight into gameplay (though sometimes you'll find some textures streaming in).
Hasn't this photo been discredited several times?