The fuck do you even need or do with $200 billion.
I don't see how anyone (r) or (d) can read this and not have a lot of questions about why Trump is so adament on lifting Russian sanctions.
Either he's an idiot and doesn't know what he's trying to do, or he's in on it.
Citizen's United was worse than we ever imagined. It's completely opened us up to foreign influence. And like everything else, it all comes down to money. It's strange it's all coming to a head now though. Putin played the game so well, did Donald Trump really screw the pooch this much?
If Putin's real goal is just to get access to his money and not to just throw the west into chaos, then he's actually screwed up really big here.
One of the Russian lawyers that works for Putin to try and lobby to overturn the Maginistky Act was one of the people that was at that one meeting with Don Jr. where they were offering him collusion in the election most likely in return for repealing the Act.I watched the opening statement. Wow!
Please understand there is a lot going on here and a lot of names I may not remember or connect.
So this is tied to Trump how?
Ok that's what I figured. Holy shit! This is big.One of the Russian lawyers that works for Putin to overturn the Maginistky Act was one of the people that was at that one meeting with Don Jr.
Also, Trump said he talked adoptions with Putin when he talked to him alone at the G20 dinner. Since stopping adoptions of Russian children was Putin's response to the Magnitsky Act, that basically means they were talking about the Magnitsky Act at some level. Without even a U.S. translator as a witness, and no record of the conversation.Ok that's what I figured. Holy shit! This is big.
Thanks!
I wonder how many attempts have been made on this dudes life. Must be dozens at least.
Someone in the thread mentioned how Trump and Kushner's family business could merely be laundering Russian money. It makes sense considering Manafort and his Russian mob pals living in his building. If that's the case, then it makes finding a smoking collusion gun less plausible because his whole business would be collusion. The specific act of releasing the emails would be small potatoes (and wouldn't require a specific order if they were already colluding) if Trump is laundering hundreds of millions or billions of dollars.
The line of questioning about if they could find this from "tax returns" means they are already assuming Trump is tied into this more than they've let on publicly. I don't remember if they mentioned Trump but asking about "tax returns" definitely alludes to that imo.
What if we don't find any specific collusion as far as Hillary emails go but instead we found out 90% of his worth is Russian money or something? That would be a huge blow. Another thing is could a treason case be made for working with someone who should have been registered under FARA but neglected to do so?
Could they use the defence that because these people didn't register under FARA that they didn't know of their ties to the Russian government?Someone in the thread mentioned how Trump and Kushner's family business could merely be laundering Russian money. It makes sense considering Manafort and his Russian mob pals living in his building. If that's the case, then it makes finding a smoking collusion gun less plausible because his whole business would be collusion. The specific act of releasing the emails would be small potatoes (and wouldn't require a specific order if they were already colluding) if Trump is laundering hundreds of millions or billions of dollars.
The line of questioning about if they could find this from "tax returns" means they are already assuming Trump is tied into this more than they've let on publicly. I don't remember if they mentioned Trump but asking about "tax returns" definitely alludes to that imo.
What if we don't find any specific collusion as far as Hillary emails go but instead we found out 90% of his worth is Russian money or something? That would be a huge blow. Another thing is could a treason case be made for working with someone who should have been registered under FARA but neglected to do so?
Wtf at this thread being so slow, please can we edit the thread title to something more attention grabbing? Everyone should read the article.
45:19: No one was talking about "adoptions".
1:01:50: Rohrabacher (holy shit).
An email reviewed by The Daily Beast shows that before that June 14 hearing, Rohrabachers staff received pro-Kremlin briefings against Browder, once Russias biggest foreign investor, and his tax attorney Sergei Magnitsky from a lawyer who was working with Veselnitskaya.
Although House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) had prohibited Rohrabacher from showing the Russian propaganda film in Congress, Rohrabachers Capitol Hill office still actively promoted a screening of the movie that was held at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on June 13, 2016. Veselnitskaya was one of those handling the movies worldwide promotion.
Invitations to attend the movie screening were sent from the subcommittee office by Catharine ONeill, a Republican intern on Rohrabachers committee. Her email promised that the movie would convince viewers that Magnitsky, who was murdered in a Russian prison cell, was no hero.
45:19: No one was talking about "adoptions".
1:01:50: Rohrabacher (holy shit)
It takes 5 minutes to read that. C'mon.
On topic...that's a powerful read. Yea...follow that money.
Heh, this came up in my YouTube suggestions - Russian state-sponsored channel trying to paint Browder as a tax-evading bigot.
Note that the 'tax evasion' they're accusing him of (and for which he was convicted in absentia in Moscow) is actually the 230 million USD worth of taxes corrupt Russian officials embezzled using registrations and assets illegally seized from his Browder's companies in violent police raids (a very Russian phenomenon known as reiderstvo, basically state-sanctioned corporate raiding.)
It's not enough to charge him with a fake crime, it had to be one of the crimes he was blowing the whistle on. Fuckers love their irony.
Image is broken I think, pal
Just keeping this on the front page in hopes that more people click. Crazy how much this is being overshadowed by the daily clown show that is the President's mouth/twitter account, and the stooges at the White House. This is probably the clearest account to date of one piece of what can be perceived to be the big picture. Makes you wonder what the team investigating the whole thing actually knows.
I just don't know how you make this stuff stick with a particular demographic.
They'll always be convinced this is "fake news" and then immediately turn the question to "What about Hillary?" or "Obama's an even bigger crook."
Wtf at this thread being so slow, please can we edit the thread title to something more attention grabbing? Everyone should read the article.
Edit something like "Bill Browder details rabbit hole of Russian corruption -must read"