ShockingAlberto said:Like you're crying about this?
Am I missing something? Where he's crying about this?
Or this is just another holier-than-thou post of yours. I guess it's the latter.
ShockingAlberto said:Like you're crying about this?
Fuck those people. They have terrible taste and should be ignored so they'll go away.randomkid said:Ignore the terrible logic. He's basically right in this case. Do you remember the people who complained in the Uncharted thread before it changed? Do you remember the many many people who complained in the Bayonetta thread?
There is a sizable constituency for the bloat on this message board. People will complain if things change.
Your definition of "liking" needs revision.thekad said:I like how even liking a game is now worthy of derision and accusations of viral marketing on GAF.
Just because people complain about change doesn't mean it shouldn't be enacted. If change benefits the users as a whole, we can that "progress."randomkid said:There is a sizable constituency for the bloat on this message board. People will complain if things change.
It's not crying, actually. It was more to point out that dismissing any reasoning as "crying" or "bitching" if it's counter to your view is a damn fool's way of arguing. And you're not a damn fool, you're just dishonest.flyinpiranha said:How is this crying? I'm not advocating any change or making a thread about stupid shit that could be avoidable. I see what point you are trying to make and I guess that just supports mine.
Are you new on the internet?Sullichin said:I don't understand why the people making the OTs put so much work into the first post, seems like a total waste of time if you're not getting paid for it. Some of them have a ton of custom made images and are filled with information.
pakkit said:Just because people complain about change doesn't mean it shouldn't be enacted. If change benefits the users as a whole, we can that "progress."
Assuming you mean the Uncharted 3 thread, back when it first went up it was just a single image that was just a crappy doodle. It was pretty obviously a placeholder, but if it weren't I'd hardly call wanting more information people requesting bloat. Having 0 information is just as bad as having information overload.randomkid said:Ignore the terrible logic. He's basically right in this case. Do you remember the people who complained in the Uncharted thread before it changed? Do you remember the many many people who complained in the Bayonetta thread?
There is a sizable constituency for the bloat on this message board. People will complain if things change.
I don't actually know who you are so, uh, thanks for noticing that any of my posts have a theme? I guess?Kikujiro said:Am I missing something? Where he's crying about this?
Or this is just another holier-than-thou post of yours. I guess it's the latter.
Boney said:Is that AC op an inside joke or something?
Boney said:Is that AC op an inside joke or something?
Stumpokapow said:So in other words, your post is, in order;
u mad and u jelly
haters gonna hate
deal with it
FINALBOSS said:Something a user does out of the goodness of their heart AND FREE for your satisfaction, and you have the balls to whine and bitch because it's not concise enough for you? Get real dude.
I don't know, but it might make a nice brochure. He should stick it in his portfolio.Boney said:Is that AC op an inside joke or something?
I don't disagree with any of this.hikarutilmitt said:In summary, OTs should be:
Not too wide, image-wise (even my own I thought was pushing it with 900px-wide images...). This prevents scrolling on somewhat smaller resolutions for things like laptops and tablets (phones should be excluded because, well, fuck em. I don't use my goddamned phone as my primary browser).
Able to fit into a single post. If you cannot fit all of the information you feel is needed for that game into a single post, consider what isn't pertinent and cut some fat.
A combination of text and images (if images are needed), but not text in images. That shit is awful. And ugly.
Mindful of the bandwidth it takes to load content in the first post. Just because you have FIOS or something similar in speed doesn't mean everyone does, nor does it mean you should not care. We (GAF) will bitch and moan about ISP bandwidth caps all day regarding things like Steam/PSN/XBLA and buying music and movies, but we cannot do each other the favor of not making it take several dozen MB in size just to load a single thread of your own making?
Clearly a lot of us don't see the point in a goddamned huge OT that encompasses multiple games in a series when you can easily just put the necessary information for that particular game and link to the previous OTs or other sources of more in-depth information.
I like Metal Gear. I even like MGS4. I think that OT is a work of art. But it's also just too goddamned much. That ACR OT goes above and beyond to not make me want to read what could potentially make me want to play it.
This is all my opinion of course, with some summary of very good points made in this very thread.
Personally I'd like this to be in the TOS.Drkirby said:I really say I wish there was some mandate that the majority of text in an OP had to actually be text, and not part of an image.
Plague has more than one meaning. It can also mean something that is troubling, annoying, etc. It doesn't always have to mean disease.FStop7 said:The OP refers to people as shills and claims that large OTs are a "plague". A fucking plague, as in a disease that kills thousands of people. One more time - he likens posts on the Internet about video games to diseases.
How can one respond to such ridiculousness with anything other than something ridiculous?
I like everything but the "Has to fit one post" thing. If the guy wants to make 50 posts to fit his super ultra mega OP, fine. I just really hate text in images. And I don't like how long some of those image intense topics can take to load.hikarutilmitt said:In summary, OTs should be:
Not too wide, image-wise (even my own I thought was pushing it with 900px-wide images...). This prevents scrolling on somewhat smaller resolutions for things like laptops and tablets (phones should be excluded because, well, fuck em. I don't use my goddamned phone as my primary browser).
Able to fit into a single post. If you cannot fit all of the information you feel is needed for that game into a single post, consider what isn't pertinent and cut some fat.
A combination of text and images (if images are needed), but not text in images. That shit is awful. And ugly.
Mindful of the bandwidth it takes to load content in the first post. Just because you have FIOS or something similar in speed doesn't mean everyone does, nor does it mean you should not care. We (GAF) will bitch and moan about ISP bandwidth caps all day regarding things like Steam/PSN/XBLA and buying music and movies, but we cannot do each other the favor of not making it take several dozen MB in size just to load a single thread of your own making?
Clearly a lot of us don't see the point in a goddamned huge OT that encompasses multiple games in a series when you can easily just put the necessary information for that particular game and link to the previous OTs or other sources of more in-depth information.
I like Metal Gear. I even like MGS4. I think that OT is a work of art. But it's also just too goddamned much. That ACR OT goes above and beyond to not make me want to read what could potentially make me want to play it.
This is all my opinion of course, with some summary of very good points made in this very thread.
ShockingAlberto said:It's not crying, actually. It was more to point out that dismissing any reasoning as "crying" or "bitching" if it's counter to your view is a damn fool's way of arguing. And you're not a damn fool, you're just dishonest.
And I don't see the OP advocating any change aside from asking people to show some restraint. Would you like to quote me where he said that?
You disagree with people that these are not masturbatory, embarrassing PR wanks. That's fine. You can disagree all you want. But you started throwing around the childish attacks either because you're incapable of articulating your point or simply choose not to.
Although we can be generous and say it's the first one while pretending to be the second.
Divvy said:Haha oh man, that asscreed OT is ridiculous. Wow, I hope someone got paid for that.
FStop7 said:The OP refers to people as shills and claims that large OTs are a "plague". A fucking plague, as in a disease that kills thousands of people. One more time - he likens posts on the Internet about video games to diseases.
How can one respond to such ridiculousness with anything other than something ridiculous?
lazybones18 said:I can only imagine how big the Skyward Sword lOTl will be
EmCeeGramr said:The point of an OT is to give concise information about the game:
Most people seem to LIKE concise yet informative threads.
This whole "BUT THEY'LL BITCH ABOUT IT ANYWAY" is an illogical and ignorant attempt to make everyone who disagrees with you into some kind of collective hypocritical hive mind.
FStop7 said:The OP refers to people as shills and claims that large OTs are a "plague". A fucking plague, as in a disease that kills thousands of people. One more time - he likens posts on the Internet about video games to diseases.
How can one respond to such ridiculousness with anything other than something ridiculous?
Holy shit this is amazingCriminal Upper said:Here is an example of the best OT on GAF. Everyone should subscribe, and buy the game it's dedicated for.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=450219
ShockingAlberto said:I don't disagree with any of this.
But my issue with OTs is greater than simply structure. They're sales pitches. Maybe it became that way, maybe it's always been that way, but it's goddamn cringe-worthy all the same.
Until people can get past the idea that an official thread is to sell people on a game, rather than set the tone for the discussion (though the two likely go hand-in-hand for most), they're always going to come off as shill-like and PR-invoking servicing of a game no one involved has actually played.
butter_stick said:The worst thing about these ridiculous threads is just how seriously the OP often takes it. There's no charm or self awareness, instead it just reads like a press release, or a sample of the OPs ability to create a nice press kit.
So your stance is that you have not been dismissive or condescending or insulting to people at all or that you have but it's okay because some people were mean to you?flyinpiranha said:Go back and read my posts. So far I've been called a coward and to fuck off because I said "people will bitch about anything" in a nutshell.
Oh, and now you're insulting my intelligence with not being able to create decent argument because there is no need for one. If you don't like those OT's, don't click on them.
Amir0x will save us.[Nintex] said:I looked at it again and what has the OP done?
You just know that putting the entire Assassins Creed series in there is going to 'inspire' people. The next Zelda thread will have all of Zelda's lore, theorized timelines, items, characters, Iwata Asks interviews, transcripts of famitsu interviews, fanarts, moves, different links, different zelda's, different graphical styles, different hyrules, 'did you know Link had pink hair once?', sidequests, Link's many enemies and more. Not to mention the Mario 3D Land thread, which will go down the list of EVERY GAME Mario has ever appeared in(even as a cameo or in beta(hello Diddy Kong Pilot, Mario 128 et all) in detail. Along with every easter egg(Mario paintings in OOT, cloudbush(!), Mario World as a background in some TV show, Mario Bros. 3 in the Wizard, the Mario movie and more. Years of Mario history for everyone to enjoy. The OP will span 100 pages.
We're already fucked.
You mean the guy who started to write a diary for every day that Skyward Sword wasn't out.Green Scar said:It's Amir0x, he'll be cool with it.
FStop7 said:The OP refers to people as shills and claims that large OTs are a "plague". A fucking plague, as in a disease that kills thousands of people. One more time - he likens posts on the Internet about video games to diseases.
How can one respond to such ridiculousness with anything other than something ridiculous?
The Mario 3D Land OP has been up for days![Nintex] said:I looked at it again and what has the OP done?
You just know that putting the entire Assassins Creed series in there is going to 'inspire' people. The next Zelda thread will have all of Zelda's lore, theorized timelines, items, characters, Iwata Asks interviews, transcripts of famitsu interviews, fanarts, moves, different links, different zelda's, different graphical styles, different hyrules, 'did you know Link had pink hair once?', sidequests, Link's many enemies and more. Not to mention the Mario 3D Land thread, which will go down the list of EVERY GAME Mario has ever appeared in(even as a cameo or in beta(hello Diddy Kong Pilot, Mario 128 et all) in detail. Along with every easter egg(Mario paintings in OOT, cloudbush(!), Mario World as a background in some TV show, Mario Bros. 3 in the Wizard, the Mario movie and more. Years of Mario history for everyone to enjoy. The OP will span 100 pages.
We're already fucked.
Oh okay, I shouldn't act like my opinion on what an OT should be is anything more tha-JJD said:That's just your opinion. Don't act like it's a fact.
OOPSJJD said:I learned a lot of in there, isn't this the objective of a OT?
"Most people seem like concise OPs" isn't conjecture, it's anecdotal, try again.JJD said:Are you really trying to pass conjecture as fact again? People CAN like anything, I doesn't stop then from having preferences. You like your OTs short and concise, I prefer mine in depth and informative.
OOPS X2 COMBOJJD said:As soon as OTs start to get concise and minimal people will bitch that the OP is not putting enough effort.
So it's illogical to say you dislike something... just because you dislike something.JJD said:It's probably as illogical, ignorant and stupid as calling an OT bloated and paste-bin just because you don't like it.
That goes to show that size does matter!Phat Michael said:i agree it was ridiculous. The third post down disagrees with us though..
"Mother of God.
Amazing OP. The best one I've seen since I'm on GAF. Almost makes me want to buy the game."