Boehner: Nation on the path to default if Obama doesn't give concessions for ACA

Status
Not open for further replies.
On 9/12 Boehner asked for the Senate to drop $80 billion dollars in additional funding they voted into the budget in exchange for a clean CR, which Obama and Reid agreed to. Then Boehner said that getting his initial request wasn't enough and he needs more. So why should the Dems continue to make concessions to House Republicans when they don't get anything back.

Wait, I didn't know about this part. So it really is exactly like that West Wing scene then?
 
My biggest fear is that if Republicans do give in, when the debt ceiling debate starts, they'll be making more ridiculous demands under the guise of already compromising when funding the government. Seeing how the media's been covering this fiasco, we'll be hearing things like "it's the democrats' turn to give up something," when none of this should have been happening in the first place.
 
There's no more voting to do on the ACA, Mr. Paul. It's already been passed, and it's been vetted by the Supremes. A vote for a clean CR is a vote to keep the government functioning, not a vote for Obamacare.

There's no more voting to do on the ACA! It's the law of the land.

But to the constituents that put these GOP reps in office, it IS voting on it.

Also, I think there are two very specific reasons they're doing this, and they cut to the core of the issue. First, republicans have been talking for a few years now about how awful the ACA is. It's been the go-to-dead-horse for the GOP. Anything bad happens they can tag it to Obamacare. "Oh, unemployment is up? Obamacare! People are on foodstamps? Obamacare. Benghazi? OBAMACARE" etc.

Through all this, they've made some incredible claims about Obamacare and they've made some incredible claims about Obama. When the ACA is implemented, they don't have that punching bag anymore. This leads into the second reason, and that reason is they're scared to death the ACA will actually work.

If the ACA doesn't do all the crazy shit the republicans have said, they will look TERRIBLE. Further, if the ACA works as it's supposed to and people like it, it could literally doom the careers of the same people who've been screaming it's the worst thing to ever happen to America. They will be shown to be uninformed hate mongers who spread fear for nothing more than political gain.

How's that different than any other time most politicians speak? I think it will be different because it will be the first time that I could think of where a wide swath of politicians would be put on blast as completely inept. We've had one offs in the past, people like Clay Aiken with the "Legitimate rape" comment, Michelle Bachman saying Obamacare was literally killing people, and that one republican saying that 93% of what Planned Parenthood did was abortions (only to walk it back and say "I did not intend my statement to be factual"). So we get those crazies by themselves, but can you imagine the kind of damage the GOP as a WHOLE will take if the ACA works? There will be literally MILLIONS of voters who will look at the tactics the GOP used and never vote republican for the rest of their lives. And the GOP knows this, and I think its why they're willing to crash they economy. They're fighting obsolescence.
 
My biggest fear is that if Republicans do give in, when the debt ceiling debate starts, they'll be making more ridiculous demands under the guise of already compromising when funding the government. Seeing how the media's been covering this fiasco, we'll be hearing things like "it's the democrats' turn to give up something," when none of this should have been happening in the first place.

I don't think the general public will like hearing the Republicans forcing us towards this crisis every few months.
It would be political suicide for Republicans.
 
My biggest fear is that if Republicans do give in, when the debt ceiling debate starts, they'll be making more ridiculous demands under the guise of already compromising when funding the government. Seeing how the media's been covering this fiasco, we'll be hearing things like "it's the democrats' turn to give up something," when none of this should have been happening in the first place.

At that point I expect the list of demands from the republican party to be like the demands Dave Chappelle parodied on his show when he impersonated Puff Daddy.

"I want a picture of a midget, holding these balloons! And some Cambodian breast milk!"

tumblr_mdbhjafYev1qgyos6o1_r1_400.gif


Boehner is in the middle, the one with the dreads is Mitch Mconnel, and the other one is Michelle Bachman.
 
Can someone explain to me what the talk of the fourteenth resolution is about as it pertains to this issue?

Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment:

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

I suppose, the idea is to say that the Republicans are rebelling against the United States.

Though, Obama has said he really can't do that.
 
Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment:



I suppose, the idea is to say that the Republicans are rebelling against the United States.

Though, Obama has said he really can't do that.

What. The hell. Are you talking about?

Section 4 of the 14th Amendment said:
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payments of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”

That's the part people think gives the President the power to arbitrarily raise the debt limit.
 
Ah right. Though, lawyers have argued that there really is no circumstance under which the President can just raise the debt ceiling himself.

no conclusive evidence either way.

oh look Dow went down 140ish points.
thanks Obama. /sarcasm
 
Ah right. Though, lawyers have argued that there really is no circumstance under which the President can just raise the debt ceiling himself.

The argument would be that the concept of a debt ceiling itself is unconstitutional.
 
I wonder if this whole fiasco will end up irreparably and forever destroying and fracturing the Republican Party? Seems like that could happen regardless of what Boehner does. It's like Custer's Last Stand or something.
 
Yup. Just something that would have to be put to the test. Though, it seems this won't be the test.

No one wants to test it. It would either cripple the economy if it fails or open the door for the presidency to expand its power through interpretations of it.

truly a nuclear option in every sense of the word.
 
Obama should move to unilaterally raise the limit himself. If republicans want to impeach him, great. That'll be two democratic presidents in a row they'll have moved to impeach, the optics of which would be glaring. They're sore losers, and bitterly desperate for power, going so far as to to circumvent the democratic process to attain it.
 
I wonder if this whole fiasco will end up irreparably and forever destroying and fracturing the Republican Party? Seems like that could happen regardless of what Boehner does. It's like Custer's Last Stand or something.

I still fully expect the House to be run by Republicans come the midterm elections. It wouldn't even surprise me if they won the Senate. Or if they somehow got a Republican president in there during midterms.

Why stop at where they're at now for circumventing the system?
 
I think we're heading toward a fracturing of the old republicans (GOP) from the main party and tea party taking over Republican Party at large. They've shown to have a lot of support during the Obama years and the old republican ideology doesn't resonate with their base anymore. It's less about legal process and more about social issues with the tea party. Class warfare, feeding off of racial fears and against women's rights and praising religion as their justification for it all.


It's really sick. I'd take a bush-era republican over these assholes any day.
 
I think we're heading toward a fracturing of the old republicans (GOP) from the main party and tea party taking over Republican Party at large. They've shown to have a lot of support during the Obama years and the old republican ideology doesn't resonate with their base anymore. It's less about legal process and more about social issues with the tea party. Class warfare, feeding off of racial fears and against women's rights and praising religion as their justification for it all.


It's really sick. I'd take a bush-era republican over these assholes any day.

One can only hope that they become more extreme and push further to the right so that they will fade into irrelevance.
 
I often wonder this, things seem to have gotten crazier. Republicans were never this nuts right?

Or is it just more apparent now?

Depends on who you ask but I personally always felt that the republicans were more or less on equal level of crazy as the democrats. Now the party is so broken from the last two elections they have no clear leadership and the fringe gained power because Obama is a "socialist" president who is black. Obama essentially gave rise to them and it is the embodiment of many of America's terrible aspects.

When I think republican I think people who try to make business/the rich better. Now republican is a metaphor for social conservativity.
 
Of course the debt ceiling must be raised, like it or not, the alternative is unthinkable. But Obama must be kicking himself over this...

He should be. Because it was just as stupid for him to pretend like debt matters as it is for Republicans. He played right into this by championing stupid right-wing bullshit.
 
I think we're heading toward a fracturing of the old republicans (GOP) from the main party and tea party taking over Republican Party at large.

Good, because I actually agree with a number of the old-school Republican ideals. But for years now the GOP has become a joke. I propose a return of the GOP and a splintering off of the Jesus Loves Guns Party.
 
One can only hope that they become more extreme and push further to the right so that they will fade into irrelevance.

They won't seem that extreme if Democrats continue to follow behind them while continuing to wear liberal masks.
 
I think we're heading toward a fracturing of the old republicans (GOP) from the main party and tea party taking over Republican Party at large. They've shown to have a lot of support during the Obama years and the old republican ideology doesn't resonate with their base anymore. It's less about legal process and more about social issues with the tea party. Class warfare, feeding off of racial fears and against women's rights and praising religion as their justification for it all.


It's really sick. I'd take a bush-era republican over these assholes any day.
I'm starting to come around to this position as well. With gerrymandering, corporate money and partisan media fueling it I think the tea party is going to become the face of the republican party and outcast or swallow the rest of it.

I'm betting that when a number of republicans cave near the 16th and vote for a clean bill many republicans will get primaried and be replaced by crazies. The tea party will grow while the democrats gain traction in the house and maintain a narrow hold in the senate.

I used to think the party was going to have a moment of clarity and realize they are on a path of long term ruin and irrelevance but I think they are so out of touch with reality at this point that it is going take far more then I ever thought to eradicate their scourge.
 
I don't think the Pretend-to-be-Republicans (Tea Partiers) really understand the ramifications of defaulting on the loans. Think Lehman Brothers' collapse but 23 times that since it will be $12 trillion dollars. That also means China could easily ask for their money back since they have over a trillion dollars of US Treasuries.

An eventual economic collapse will happen not just in the US, but worldwide.
 
But to the constituents that put these GOP reps in office, it IS voting on it.

Also, I think there are two very specific reasons they're doing this, and they cut to the core of the issue. First, republicans have been talking for a few years now about how awful the ACA is. It's been the go-to-dead-horse for the GOP. Anything bad happens they can tag it to Obamacare. "Oh, unemployment is up? Obamacare! People are on foodstamps? Obamacare. Benghazi? OBAMACARE" etc.

Through all this, they've made some incredible claims about Obamacare and they've made some incredible claims about Obama. When the ACA is implemented, they don't have that punching bag anymore. This leads into the second reason, and that reason is they're scared to death the ACA will actually work.

If the ACA doesn't do all the crazy shit the republicans have said, they will look TERRIBLE. Further, if the ACA works as it's supposed to and people like it, it could literally doom the careers of the same people who've been screaming it's the worst thing to ever happen to America. They will be shown to be uninformed hate mongers who spread fear for nothing more than political gain.

How's that different than any other time most politicians speak? I think it will be different because it will be the first time that I could think of where a wide swath of politicians would be put on blast as completely inept. We've had one offs in the past, people like Clay Aiken with the "Legitimate rape" comment, Michelle Bachman saying Obamacare was literally killing people, and that one republican saying that 93% of what Planned Parenthood did was abortions (only to walk it back and say "I did not intend my statement to be factual"). So we get those crazies by themselves, but can you imagine the kind of damage the GOP as a WHOLE will take if the ACA works? There will be literally MILLIONS of voters who will look at the tactics the GOP used and never vote republican for the rest of their lives. And the GOP knows this, and I think its why they're willing to crash they economy. They're fighting obsolescence.
I think you're giving the base on the right too much credit here.
 
Can you elaborate? If all their doomsday prophecies of the end of america don't pan out, they're not exactly going to look like the smartest guys in the room.
It doesn't matter. It's been 5 years of Obama being President and the nation isn't in ruin. Do you think this has stopped the conservative media from lying and projecting? The last election didn't make them wake up either.
 
The Republicans aren't going to let us default, IMO. Remember that money rules everything. If politicians weren't beholden to corporate interests, then I'd be scared.

It'll hurt corporations, it'll hurt their party, it'll hurt their own personal bottom line too. They'll stand off, then point and say that Obama tried to, and almost did, tank the world economy. Their base will buy it and they'll suffer with independents, but that's the outcome that will happen regardless of what choice they make.
 
Get your fiscal house in order: China warns US as superpower expresses concern for $1.3tn of investments

Zhu Guangyao said:
We ask that the United States earnestly takes steps to resolve in a timely way the political issues around the debt ceiling and prevent a US debt default to ensure the safety of Chinese investments in the United States. This is the United States’ responsibility.

The Independent said:
However, economists have criticised the popular idea that China could exert political or economic leverage over Washington by threatening to sell its dollar investments, since such a drastic shift would ultimately serve to undermine the paper value of Beijing’s own vast investment portfolio. Nevertheless, China’s creditor position and its status as the world’s second largest economy gives its voice some authority in Washington.

Interesting stuff.
 
*backs away slowly*

You do know that was my first post in this thread and that I wasn't attacking you, right?

Yeah I know. I shouldn't be jumping in a discussion right away like that in a bad state of mind. Plus I'm taking a Finance class right now so yeah, I'm terrible lol.
 
Nevertheless, China’s creditor position and its status as the world’s second largest economy gives its voice some authority in Washington.

That's cute, foreigners think somebody (anybody) has authority in Washington.
 
Does Foxnews.com think they are being cute by constantly refering to the shutdown as a "slimdown" I thought maybe it was going to be a one day thing but they keep fucking doing it. I don't know why I even bother to glance over at that site every time I do it raises my blood pressure.
 
It doesn't matter. It's been 5 years of Obama being President and the nation isn't in ruin. Do you think this has stopped the conservative media from lying and projecting? The last election didn't make them wake up either.

I don't recall mentioning how the conservative media is portraying anything. I said specifically the republicans in office currently. And, to your point, I think on this issue it does matter. If the ACA works as it's supposed to, republicans are going to look AWFUL.

Look at what their current course has lead to. It's lead to more radicalization to the point where they're taking the economy hostage. They're doing it for more reasons than just trying to hurt Obama. They know if the ACA works it's going to fuck them, HARD. Independents won't believe anything they say at that point. It's the same reason why they don't want imigration reform, because Republicans think immigration reform will basically create a new block of voters that will already vote for democrats.
 
Does Foxnews.com think they are being cute by constantly refering to the shutdown as a "slimdown" I thought maybe it was going to be a one day thing but they keep fucking doing it. I don't know why I even bother to glance over at that site every time I do it raises my blood pressure.

You know how Star Trek would occasionally have an episode where an anti-matter field would collapse or a Cosmic energy ribbon would disrupt the warp core matrix, and inevitably someone would end up in a parallel universe?

Fox News is essentially Live on Location from the next dimension over. The basic cast of characters and story threads are all there, but it's completely out of touch with what's going on over here in reality.
 
Does Foxnews.com think they are being cute by constantly refering to the shutdown as a "slimdown" I thought maybe it was going to be a one day thing but they keep fucking doing it. I don't know why I even bother to glance over at that site every time I do it raises my blood pressure.

It's only a slim down, we could use a slimmer Washin~THEY'RE CLOSING A WAR MEMORIAL GET 'EM OLD PEOPLE THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DON'T NEGOTIATE.
 
I often wonder this, things seem to have gotten crazier. Republicans were never this nuts right?

Or is it just more apparent now?

I always hear that the Republicans used to be like modern Democrats if you go back far enough. That things started on this current path about 30 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom