Ah right, there was one more person that has done, well just about nothing. This person voted for Blarg first if memory serves but otherwise has had complete radio silence. Just enough to be considered "Active" but literally contributed nothing useful. Ultron87, come join us. Let's talk.
I've been at work all of today and only have time to read the thread and not much post much. Even if that wasn't the case this is basically how I always play the first few days. It is day 1. We're not going to get anything from "reads". No one is going to slip up at this point or reveal themselves by being "too defensive" or whatever. I just need to make sure I don't get killed (because I'm the one person I know isn't a bad guy) and see how things develop. And going forward I'm never going to be a 10 posts on the same page poster. Just isn't going to happen.
As I said, we should kill someone but I don't really have any opinions on who that should be. The current rotating votes thing is fine to develop some baseline of evidence, but it won't be that useful until someone is actually under threat.
Blarg had my vote because I'm not a fan of the intentionally confusing shtick he was running yesterday. He has been getting better at least by saying somethings of substance, so I could at least wait to see where it goes. I'm definitely still pretty cognizant of how convenient the "Blarg being Blarg" cover story is for someone not on our team to post a bunch of nonsense but not be actually suspicious. But hey:
Unvote: Blargonaut
With that past, I will say, Sorian, your tone of commanding everyone what to do does rub me the wrong way. Seems like you're trying really hard to establish yourself as the leader just by talking this way and trying to bend the thread to your will. Which is fine if you're town, but is also a pretty good way to stay off people's "possibly cultist" list.
Besides that everyone else has had pretty natural reactions to getting randomly accused for reasons ranging from entirely random to pretty specious.